Australian Politics Forum - My take on the US election

Bobby.

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 106928
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: My take on the US election
Reply #15 - Aug 10^th, 2024 at 6:56am

Marla wrote on Aug 10^th, 2024 at 6:38am:

Bobby. wrote on Aug 9^th, 2024 at 10:54pm:

Kamala is not very intelligent -
you need an IQ of over 140 to be the President -
Reagan did -
so did Jimmy Carter -
Obama did -

Kamala would be around 115 IQ at most - she's a DEI hire.

Can't they find a clever candidate?

Please enlighten us with your vast knowledge of quantum physics and Shakespeare, Bobby

What would you like to know Marla?

Even after smoking pot you would
probably be capable of a more interesting conversation than cackling Kamala.
She's a pain in the arse.

Back to top

IP Logged

Marla Gold Member Offline Weed is my Jesus Posts: 13753 Colorado Gender:	Re: My take on the US election Reply #16 - Aug 10^th, 2024 at 7:02am Please enlighten us, Blooby
Back to top	I know progress has no patience but something's got to give IP Logged

Bobby. Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 106928 Melbourne Gender:	Re: My take on the US election Reply #17 - Aug 10^th, 2024 at 7:06am Marla wrote on Aug 10^th, 2024 at 7:02am: Please enlighten us, Bobby Start here: Secrets of Quantum Physics, "Einstein's Nightmare"
Back to top	IP Logged

Bias_2012

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 10766
Gender: male

Re: My take on the US election
Reply #18 - Aug 10^th, 2024 at 11:40am

Bobby. wrote on Aug 10^th, 2024 at 7:06am:

Marla wrote on Aug 10^th, 2024 at 7:02am:

Please enlighten us, Bobby

Start here:

Secrets of Quantum Physics, "Einstein's Nightmare"

Very good Bobby, red light didn't effect the gold leaves in that experiment. Nor did it effect B&W film emulsion in film cameras in the early days

It was always wise to wait some days before taking your film in to be developed, so that every part of the light spectrum could effect and "burn"the emulsion - it took many hours, after the shutter closed, for the emulsion to finally settle after the weakest part of the spectrum, red, had done it's job, but it only had a tiny effect, hardly noticeable. However, photos looked better if film was left sitting around for a while before developing

A much better study for us though, would be the Human mind. It hasn't been studied thoroughly enough yet, and we'd better do it soon before the left and right take each other out

Back to top

Our Lives Are Governed By The Feast & Famine Variable

IP Logged

Sprintcyclist Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 40772 Gender:	Re: My take on the US election Reply #19 - Aug 10^th, 2024 at 12:11pm Marla wrote on Aug 10^th, 2024 at 6:39am: Baronvonrort wrote on Aug 9^th, 2024 at 11:39pm: Polls had Hillary 90% favoured to win how did that work out? Need a link for that one, Yuri I agree with Baron, I remember it
Back to top	Modern Classic Right Wing IP Logged

Sprintcyclist Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 40772 Gender:	Re: My take on the US election Reply #20 - Aug 11^th, 2024 at 2:56am When trump won against Hillary, I saw that as a decision against Hillary as she was seen as untrustworthy. When Biden won against Trump I saw that as a decision against trump as he was untrustworthy. Now there is a candidate worthy of voting for. Rather than someone to vote against.
Back to top	Modern Classic Right Wing IP Logged

UnSubRocky

Gold Member

Offline

Crocodile Hunter: Origins

Posts: 25019
Rockhampton
Gender: male

Re: My take on the US election
Reply #21 - Aug 11^th, 2024 at 10:42am

Sprintcyclist wrote on Aug 11^th, 2024 at 2:56am:

When trump won against Hillary, I saw that as a decision against Hillary as she was seen as untrustworthy.

When Biden won against Trump I saw that as a decision against trump as he was untrustworthy.

Now there is a candidate worthy of voting for.
Rather than someone to vote against.

First female president of the USA.

Back to top

At this stage...

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 139555
Gender: male

Re: My take on the US election
Reply #22 - Aug 11^th, 2024 at 10:50am

Baronvonrort wrote on Aug 9^th, 2024 at 11:39pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 9^th, 2024 at 11:35pm:

Kamala’s parents both earned PhDs—your parents?

Doesn't mean Kamala has a brain achievenments of parents aren't the same thing

Polls had Hillary 90% favoured to win how did that work out?

Did Hillary receive more votes than Trump?

And I don't want to hear how the president is chosen - everyone knows how the electoral college works.

I'm asking about her popularity, and the number of votes.

Did Hillary turn out to be more popular than Trump, according to votes cast at the ballot box?

Did she win the popular vote?

Back to top

IP Logged

tallowood Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 6048	Re: My take on the US election Reply #23 - Aug 11^th, 2024 at 1:22pm Quote: "Give them bread and circuses and they will never revolt.” said a poet in Ancient Rome. US elections are the circus part. Bread is domestic politics and there is no deficit of that while the US foreign policy has nothing to do with elections at all.
Back to top	ישראל חיה ערבים לערבים IP Logged

Armchair_Politician

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 26380
Gender: male

Re: My take on the US election
Reply #24 - Aug 11^th, 2024 at 4:03pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 11^th, 2024 at 10:50am:

Baronvonrort wrote on Aug 9^th, 2024 at 11:39pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 9^th, 2024 at 11:35pm:

Kamala’s parents both earned PhDs—your parents?

Doesn't mean Kamala has a brain achievenments of parents aren't the same thing

Polls had Hillary 90% favoured to win how did that work out?

Did Hillary receive more votes than Trump?

And I don't want to hear how the president is chosen - everyone knows how the electoral college works.

I'm asking about her popularity, and the number of votes.

Did Hillary turn out to be more popular than Trump, according to votes cast at the ballot box?

Did she win the popular vote?

If the US presidential election was decided on the popular vote, then Hillary Clinton would've been the 45th President instead of Donald Trump back in 2016. Clinton received 65,844,954 to the 62,979,879 that Trump got, which is a difference of nearly three million votes. Sadly, the only reason Clinton lost to Trump was because of the electoral college vote (304-227). Trump knows this, yet can't help himself with lies by wrongly claiming to have won the popular vote against Clinton when that clearly is not the case and is not up for debate in any way, shape or form.

Back to top

IP Logged