chimera wrote on Aug 27^th, 2024 at 7:42pm:


Some Ukrainians may consider the governments that emerged as a result of the coup on the Maidan as authorities alien to them who do not care about the state interests of Ukraine.

chimera wrote on Aug 27^th, 2024 at 8:06pm:


Let's see what Putin thought after the overthrow of Ukrainian President Yanukovych.


Vladimir Putin answered journalists’ questions on the situation in Ukraine

March 4, 2014 - 15:40

....
Vladimir Putin:

First of all, my assessment of what happened in Kiev and in Ukraine in general. There can only be one assessment: this was an anti-constitutional takeover, an armed seizure of power. Does anyone question this? Nobody does. There is a question here that neither I, nor my colleagues, with whom I have been discussing the situation in Ukraine a great deal over these past days, as you know – none of us can answer. The question is why was this done?

I would like to draw your attention to the fact that President Yanukovych, through the mediation of the Foreign Ministers of three European countries – Poland, Germany and France ... signed an agreement with the opposition on February 21. I would like to stress that under that agreement ... Mr Yanukovych actually handed over power. He agreed to all the opposition’s demands: he agreed to early parliamentary elections, to early presidential elections, and to return to the 2004 Constitution, as demanded by the opposition. He gave a positive response to our request, the request of western countries and, first of all, of the opposition not to use force. He did not issue a single illegal order to shoot at the poor demonstrators. Moreover, he issued orders to withdraw all police forces from the capital, and they complied. He went to Kharkov to attend an event, and as soon as he left, instead of releasing the occupied administrative buildings, they immediately occupied the President’s residence and the Government building – all that instead of acting on the agreement.

I ask myself, what was the purpose of all this? I want to understand why this was done. He had in fact given up his power already, and as I believe, as I told him, he had no chance of being re-elected. Everybody agrees on this, everyone I have been speaking to on the telephone these past few days. What was the purpose of all those illegal, unconstitutional actions, why did they have to create this chaos in the country? Armed and masked militants are still roaming the streets of Kiev. This is a question to which there is no answer.
..............

Are the current authorities legitimate? The Parliament is partially, but all the others are not. The current Acting President is definitely not legitimate. There is only one legitimate President, from a legal standpoint. Clearly, he has no power. However, as I have already said, and will repeat: Yanukovych is the only undoubtedly legitimate President.

There are three ways of removing a President under Ukrainian law: one is his death, the other is when he personally steps down, and the third is impeachment. The latter is a well-deliberated constitutional  norm. It has to involve the Constitutional Court, the Supreme Court and the Rada. This is a complicated and lengthy procedure. It was not carried out. Therefore, from a legal perspective this is an undisputed fact.

Moreover, I think this may be why they disbanded the Constitutional Court, which runs counter to all legal norms of both Ukraine and Europe. They not only disbanded the Constitutional Court in an illegitimate fashion, but they also – just think about it – instructed the Prosecutor General’s Office to launch criminal proceedings against members of the Constitutional Court. What is that all about? Is this what they call free justice? How can you instruct anyone to start criminal proceedings? If a crime, a criminal offence, has been committed, the law enforcement agencies see this and react. But instructing them to file criminal charges is nonsense, it’s monkey business.
.....

After all, look at how it all began, what triggered these events. The formal reason was that he did not sign the European Union Association Agreement. Today, this seems like nonsense; it is ridiculous to even talk about. But I want to point out that he did not refuse to sign the association agreement. He said: “We have carefully analysed it, and its content does not correspond with our national interests. We cannot sharply increase energy prices for our people, because our people are already in a rather difficult position. We cannot do this, and that, and that. We cannot immediately break our economic ties with Russia, because our cooperation is very extensive.”

I have already presented these figures: out of approximately 14 billion [dollars] in export, approximately 5 billion represents second and third technological processing level products exported to Russia. In other words, just about all engineering products are exported to Russia; the West is not buying any Ukrainian products. And to take all this and break it apart, to introduce European technical standards in the Ukrainian economy ... This means the next day, our relations and cooperation ties will be broken, enterprises will come to a standstill and unemployment will increase. And what did Yanukovych say? He said, “I cannot do this so suddenly, let’s discuss this further.” He did not refuse to sign it, he asked for a chance to discuss this document some more, and then all this craziness began.
........
http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/20366

tallowood wrote on Aug 26^th, 2024 at 12:24pm:


If you go far enough back I suppose they are traditionalists. Russia is the rape and pillage team. Starting pointless wars that kill thousands just to distract the Russians from Putin's incompetence, and filling online forums with idiotic claims to be "Christian", "traditionalist" and whatever other straw they can clutch at. No sane person wants them to win. Trying to win over religious people after spending decades literally trying to wipe out religion was one of their stupider ideas.

Dooms day clock seconds to midnight
Ajax.  Aug 25th, 2024   
The incursion in to Kursk has revealed that not only was there Ukrainian soldiers but also Polish, American, French and English soldiers in sheep's clothing. Russia has taken this to mean that NATO attacked Kursk.
--------------
Americans are in the Russian army meaning NATO attacked Ukraine. 
Three Ukraine-based Russian paramilitary groups say they have crossed into Russia and are now fighting government troops there.
The Freedom of Russia Legion (FRL) and Siberian Battalion (SB) posted videos purportedly showing their fighters in Russia's Belgorod and Kursk regions. This means that Russia attacked Russia.

As Lavrov is checking his nukes then Putin is obligated to nuke NATO to defend Ukraine and nuke Russia to defend Russia. This will win the Great Homosexual War and destroy Christians, straights and testicles.
'During the first 50–60 days after moderate levels of irradiation (1.5–2 Gy dose), the sperm count is reduced up to 50%, which may even lead to azoospermia after moderate-to-high dose irradiation'. [ azoospermia : no sperm]

chimera wrote on Aug 28^th, 2024 at 8:59am:



Lavrov knows that NATO has nukes too.      

Result of US civil war 2 will depend on who have more nukes republicans or democrats.

Nuclear civil war is part of American establishment mentality.

Persecution of our church brings shame on Ukraine

Tuesday August 27 2024, 9.00pm BST, The Times

Volodymyr Zelensky is considered a hero by many in the West for his skilful and active leadership of Ukraine during the war with the Russian Federation. But he is not a hero to the millions of members of my church, the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC), spiritual home of the Ukrainian people for 1,000 years.
......

https://www.thetimes.com/comment/columnists/article/persecution-church-brings-sh...