Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 ... 20
Send Topic Print
Replacement Migration (Read 8457 times)
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 42028
Re: Replacement Migration
Reply #135 - Nov 21st, 2024 at 1:00pm
 
...
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 46726
Gender: male
Re: Replacement Migration
Reply #136 - Nov 21st, 2024 at 1:27pm
 
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 42028
Re: Replacement Migration
Reply #137 - Nov 21st, 2024 at 4:53pm
 
...
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 48852
Gender: male
Re: Replacement Migration
Reply #138 - Nov 21st, 2024 at 5:34pm
 
Thousands of new immigrant Curry Munchers operating black market tobacco, vaps and drugs under the counter on hundreds of Tobacco Shops all over NSW are being busted.

Positive immigration folks 😆
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
SadKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


#FightStupid

Posts: 17291
Mianjin (Brisbane)
Re: Replacement Migration
Reply #139 - Nov 21st, 2024 at 7:25pm
 
Jasin wrote on Nov 21st, 2024 at 5:34pm:
Curry Munchers


Way to invalidate your opinion f
uck
wit.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 48852
Gender: male
Re: Replacement Migration
Reply #140 - Nov 21st, 2024 at 7:39pm
 
Don't call me Aussie. It's Australian.
Don't call them Nips, because they're from Nippon.
Cuz we both know you call them Japs!

I can tell you're covered in fleas SK. You can only nit pick the insignificant.
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
SadKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


#FightStupid

Posts: 17291
Mianjin (Brisbane)
Re: Replacement Migration
Reply #141 - Nov 22nd, 2024 at 8:14am
 
Jasin wrote on Nov 21st, 2024 at 7:39pm:
Don't call me Aussie. It's Australian.


"Aussie" is not a slur.

Quote:
Don't call them Nips, because they're from Nippon.


In a historical context, particularly during World War II, "nip" was used as a derogatory shorthand for "Japanese" (from "Nippon," the Japanese name for Japan). In this context, it is a racial slur and is offensive.

Quote:
Cuz we both know you call them Japs!


Correct, that is widely considered a slur when used to refer to Japanese people. While it originated as a shortened form of "Japanese," its use became derogatory and offensive, particularly during World War II, when it was employed in propaganda and racist rhetoric.

Today, using the term is generally regarded as disrespectful and insensitive, given its historical baggage and offensive connotations. Referring to individuals or the Japanese community with the full term "Japanese" or contextually appropriate identifiers is more respectful and widely accepted.

"Curry Muncher" is much the same.

Quote:
I can tell you're covered in fleas SK. You can only nit pick the insignificant.


You're using racial slurs, it's far from insignificant. The reliance on such language is a glaring beacon of the weakness and utter illegitimacy of your position. It exposes a profound lack of substantive reasoning, as you abandon logical evidence and rational discourse in favour of cheap, emotionally charged provocations.

Slurs do nothing to engage with ideas; they exist solely to degrade and dehumanise, a desperate tactic that lays bare your inability to challenge opposing viewpoints on even the most basic intellectual grounds.

Your credibility is shattered the moment you stoop to such levels, revealing not only your reliance on prejudice and immaturity but also your fragile, insecure nature.

Let's not mince words, resorting to slurs doesn't just expose your argument as hollow, it marks you as an irredeemable coward clinging to insults because you can't muster anything better.

It also makes you a giant piece of s
hit
unworthy of the gift of life.

But you do you.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 46726
Gender: male
Re: Replacement Migration
Reply #142 - Nov 22nd, 2024 at 8:39am
 
SadKangaroo wrote on Nov 22nd, 2024 at 8:14am:
You're using racial slurs, it's far from insignificant. The reliance on such language is a glaring beacon of the weakness and utter illegitimacy of your position. It exposes a profound lack of substantive reasoning, as you abandon logical evidence and rational discourse in favour of cheap, emotionally charged provocations.

Slurs do nothing to engage with ideas; they exist solely to degrade and dehumanise, a desperate tactic that lays bare your inability to challenge opposing viewpoints on even the most basic intellectual grounds.

Your credibility is shattered the moment you stoop to such levels, revealing not only your reliance on prejudice and immaturity but also your fragile, insecure nature.

Let's not mince words, resorting to slurs doesn't just expose your argument as hollow, it marks you as an irredeemable coward clinging to insults because you can't muster anything better.

It also makes you a giant piece of s
hit
unworthy of the gift of life.

But you do you.



Waaaay too breathless and faux-earnest.

Stereotypes are not random or baseless. They are shorthand for statistically significant characteristics.

Some stereotypes are unflattering ('slurs') but that a negative or hostile stereotyping doesn't mean they are not statistically valid.

EVERY racial and cultural group has its negative or hostile stereotypes for EVERY other group for the very simple,  undeniable reason: they are all different.


And when there is difference, there is hierarchy of valuations of those differences. Some cultures are admired, others are disdained, ridiculed or despised.


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ethnic_slurs

Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 22nd, 2024 at 8:52am by Frank »  

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 138041
Gender: male
Re: Replacement Migration
Reply #143 - Nov 22nd, 2024 at 8:45am
 
SadKangaroo wrote on Nov 22nd, 2024 at 8:14am:
Jasin wrote on Nov 21st, 2024 at 7:39pm:
Don't call me Aussie. It's Australian.


"Aussie" is not a slur.

Quote:
Don't call them Nips, because they're from Nippon.


In a historical context, particularly during World War II, "nip" was used as a derogatory shorthand for "Japanese" (from "Nippon," the Japanese name for Japan). In this context, it is a racial slur and is offensive.

Quote:
Cuz we both know you call them Japs!


Correct, that is widely considered a slur when used to refer to Japanese people. While it originated as a shortened form of "Japanese," its use became derogatory and offensive, particularly during World War II, when it was employed in propaganda and racist rhetoric.

Today, using the term is generally regarded as disrespectful and insensitive, given its historical baggage and offensive connotations. Referring to individuals or the Japanese community with the full term "Japanese" or contextually appropriate identifiers is more respectful and widely accepted.

"Curry Muncher" is much the same.

Quote:
I can tell you're covered in fleas SK. You can only nit pick the insignificant.


You're using racial slurs, it's far from insignificant. The reliance on such language is a glaring beacon of the weakness and utter illegitimacy of your position. It exposes a profound lack of substantive reasoning, as you abandon logical evidence and rational discourse in favour of cheap, emotionally charged provocations.

Slurs do nothing to engage with ideas; they exist solely to degrade and dehumanise, a desperate tactic that lays bare your inability to challenge opposing viewpoints on even the most basic intellectual grounds.

Your credibility is shattered the moment you stoop to such levels, revealing not only your reliance on prejudice and immaturity but also your fragile, insecure nature.

Let's not mince words, resorting to slurs doesn't just expose your argument as hollow, it marks you as an irredeemable coward clinging to insults because you can't muster anything better.

It also makes you a giant piece of s
hit
unworthy of the gift of life.

But you do you.


Not sure how JaSin could ever show his face here again after that scathing, and entirely accurate, appraisal.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
SadKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


#FightStupid

Posts: 17291
Mianjin (Brisbane)
Re: Replacement Migration
Reply #144 - Nov 22nd, 2024 at 10:43am
 
Frank wrote on Nov 22nd, 2024 at 8:39am:
SadKangaroo wrote on Nov 22nd, 2024 at 8:14am:
You're using racial slurs, it's far from insignificant. The reliance on such language is a glaring beacon of the weakness and utter illegitimacy of your position. It exposes a profound lack of substantive reasoning, as you abandon logical evidence and rational discourse in favour of cheap, emotionally charged provocations.

Slurs do nothing to engage with ideas; they exist solely to degrade and dehumanise, a desperate tactic that lays bare your inability to challenge opposing viewpoints on even the most basic intellectual grounds.

Your credibility is shattered the moment you stoop to such levels, revealing not only your reliance on prejudice and immaturity but also your fragile, insecure nature.

Let's not mince words, resorting to slurs doesn't just expose your argument as hollow, it marks you as an irredeemable coward clinging to insults because you can't muster anything better.

It also makes you a giant piece of s
hit
unworthy of the gift of life.

But you do you.



Waaaay too breathless and faux-earnest.

Stereotypes are not random or baseless. They are shorthand for statistically significant characteristics.

Some stereotypes are unflattering ('slurs') but that a negative or hostile stereotyping doesn't mean they are not statistically valid.

EVERY racial and cultural group has its negative or hostile stereotypes for EVERY other group for the very simple,  undeniable reason: they are all different.


And when there is difference, there is hierarchy of valuations of those differences. Some cultures are admired, others are disdained, ridiculed or despised.


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ethnic_slurs



That’s all well and good, but resorting to slurs weakens one’s arguments and lays bare their true intentions, exposing more about the individual than the substance of their post.

You and Grap are habitual offenders in this regard, so it’s hardly surprising to see you rush to its defence.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 46726
Gender: male
Re: Replacement Migration
Reply #145 - Nov 22nd, 2024 at 11:32am
 
SadKangaroo wrote on Nov 22nd, 2024 at 10:43am:
Frank wrote on Nov 22nd, 2024 at 8:39am:
SadKangaroo wrote on Nov 22nd, 2024 at 8:14am:
You're using racial slurs, it's far from insignificant. The reliance on such language is a glaring beacon of the weakness and utter illegitimacy of your position. It exposes a profound lack of substantive reasoning, as you abandon logical evidence and rational discourse in favour of cheap, emotionally charged provocations.

Slurs do nothing to engage with ideas; they exist solely to degrade and dehumanise, a desperate tactic that lays bare your inability to challenge opposing viewpoints on even the most basic intellectual grounds.

Your credibility is shattered the moment you stoop to such levels, revealing not only your reliance on prejudice and immaturity but also your fragile, insecure nature.

Let's not mince words, resorting to slurs doesn't just expose your argument as hollow, it marks you as an irredeemable coward clinging to insults because you can't muster anything better.

It also makes you a giant piece of s
hit
unworthy of the gift of life.

But you do you.



Waaaay too breathless and faux-earnest.

Stereotypes are not random or baseless. They are shorthand for statistically significant characteristics.

Some stereotypes are unflattering ('slurs') but that a negative or hostile stereotyping doesn't mean they are not statistically valid.

EVERY racial and cultural group has its negative or hostile stereotypes for EVERY other group for the very simple,  undeniable reason: they are all different.


And when there is difference, there is hierarchy of valuations of those differences. Some cultures are admired, others are disdained, ridiculed or despised.


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ethnic_slurs



That’s all well and good, but resorting to slurs weakens one’s arguments and lays bare their true intentions, exposing more about the individual than the substance of their post.

You and Grap are habitual offenders in this regard, so it’s hardly surprising to see you rush to its defence.


Silly, blow-hard harrumphing, once again.  Read your own posts and imagine yourself responding like that to
Frog eater
Sauerkraut
Banana bender
Bagel bender
Septic tank
Pommy
Gubbah
Migaloo


You wouldn't because it would be laughably fake and schoolmarmish. So is your harrumphing about curry munchers or abos, wogs, and the rest. You don't like them, you don't approve - get it. Constructing a verbose moral edifice around your disapproval IS silly preening.

Some ethnic stereotypes are fitting, including cutting ones. Groups do have negative characteristics, including ethnic and racial groups. The people who get most offended are the ones who recognise themselves in the stereotype. Milan Kunder said somewhere that if you call a dog-face a horse-face he will laugh with you heartily but if you call him a dog-face he will never forgive you.


Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
SadKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


#FightStupid

Posts: 17291
Mianjin (Brisbane)
Re: Replacement Migration
Reply #146 - Nov 22nd, 2024 at 12:24pm
 
Frank wrote on Nov 22nd, 2024 at 11:32am:
Silly, blow-hard harrumphing, once again.  Read your own posts and imagine yourself responding like that to
Frog eater
Sauerkraut
Banana bender
Bagel bender
Septic tank
Pommy
Gubbah
Migaloo


You wouldn't because it would be laughably fake and schoolmarmish. So is your harrumphing about curry munchers or abos, wogs, and the rest. You don't like them, you don't approve - get it. Constructing a verbose moral edifice around your disapproval IS silly preening.

Some ethnic stereotypes are fitting, including cutting ones. Groups do have negative characteristics, including ethnic and racial groups. The people who get most offended are the ones who recognise themselves in the stereotype. Milan Kunder said somewhere that if you call a dog-face a horse-face he will laugh with you heartily but if you call him a dog-face he will never forgive you.


If you choose to rely on racial slurs as the foundation of your argument, you immediately undermine yourself.

If your point cannot stand without resorting to such language, then it’s inherently worthless.

By now, Frank, you should be well accustomed to the worthlessness of your perspective.

Edit: Fixed quote
Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 22nd, 2024 at 1:36pm by SadKangaroo »  
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 74740
Gender: male
Re: Replacement Migration
Reply #147 - Nov 22nd, 2024 at 1:11pm
 
SadKangaroo wrote on Nov 22nd, 2024 at 12:24pm:
By now, Frank, you should be well accustomed to the worthlessness of your perspective.



Frank specializes in worthlessness .... he's got a lifetime of experience at it
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 46726
Gender: male
Re: Replacement Migration
Reply #148 - Nov 22nd, 2024 at 1:16pm
 
SadKangaroo wrote on Nov 22nd, 2024 at 12:24pm:
Frank wrote on Nov 22nd, 2024 at 11:32am:
That’s all well and good, but resorting to slurs weakens one’s arguments and lays bare their true intentions, exposing more about the individual than the substance of their post.

You and Grap are habitual offenders in this regard, so it’s hardly surprising to see you rush to its defence.


Silly, blow-hard harrumphing, once again.  Read your own posts and imagine yourself responding like that to
Frog eater
Sauerkraut
Banana bender
Bagel bender
Septic tank
Pommy
Gubbah
Migaloo


You wouldn't because it would be laughably fake and schoolmarmish. So is your harrumphing about curry munchers or abos, wogs, and the rest. You don't like them, you don't approve - get it. Constructing a verbose moral edifice around your disapproval IS silly preening.

Some ethnic stereotypes are fitting, including cutting ones. Groups do have negative characteristics, including ethnic and racial groups. The people who get most offended are the ones who recognise themselves in the stereotype. Milan Kunder said somewhere that if you call a dog-face a horse-face he will laugh with you heartily but if you call him a dog-face he will never forgive you.


If you choose to rely on racial slurs as the foundation of your argument, you immediately undermine yourself.

If your point cannot stand without resorting to such language, then it’s inherently worthless.

By now, Frank, you should be well accustomed to the worthlessness of your perspective.
[/quote]


Not at all.

It is you who focuses on 'curry munchers' SO AS TO IGNORE the broader point about illegal tobacco trade, for example, or racial ghettos, cliques, criminal enterprises, Islamic terrorism and intimidation, cultural fragmentation, envy, grievance mongering  and all the rest.

You quickly seize the easy lazy 'wacist' position so as to excuse yourself from thinking. Curry munched is not the foundation of any argument. It is idiotic for you to assert something so silly.


Bbwian mastered the avoidance of thinking by yawning. You do it by verbose cliches, carefully avoiding the point. You talk a lot but say very little to nothing about the topic at hand.



Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
SadKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


#FightStupid

Posts: 17291
Mianjin (Brisbane)
Re: Replacement Migration
Reply #149 - Nov 22nd, 2024 at 1:37pm
 
Frank wrote on Nov 22nd, 2024 at 1:16pm:
Not at all.

It is you who focuses on 'curry munchers' SO AS TO IGNORE the broader point about illegal tobacco trade, for example, or racial ghettos, cliques, criminal enterprises, Islamic terrorism and intimidation, cultural fragmentation, envy, grievance mongering  and all the rest.


I’m open to discussing that with you, provided you can frame it without resorting to racial slurs. If not, I won’t dignify your hatred with my participation.

Quote:
You quickly seize the easy lazy 'wacist' position so as to excuse yourself from thinking. Curry munched is not the foundation of any argument. It is idiotic for you to assert something so silly.


Then don't be racist...

Quote:
Bbwian mastered the avoidance of thinking by yawning. You do it by verbose cliches, carefully avoiding the point. You talk a lot but say very little to nothing about the topic at hand.


Your friend Crappler has helped me realise something important: when the most disingenuous among us, yourself and those of your ilk, demand discussions they approach without a shred of good faith, the wisest course is to leave them to their own devices and simply hold a mirror to their behaviour.

When your inevitable tantrums arise, you will have no one to blame but yourself.

If you genuinely wish to engage in a substantive discussion on the topic at hand, something I doubt, given your history of poorly argued positions, you must first demonstrate a capacity for good-faith debate. Without this, I see no merit in participating.

That said, I am willing to engage, provided you abandon the slurs and other puerile tactics. And, for the record, I will likewise refrain from "responding in kind" with insults or harsh language, but only if you prove capable of a mature and constructive exchange.

The choice is yours.  Be better than Crappler, it's not hard.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 22nd, 2024 at 1:44pm by SadKangaroo »  
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 ... 20
Send Topic Print