SadKangaroo wrote on Aug 30
th, 2024 at 11:37am:
John Smith wrote on Aug 29
th, 2024 at 12:13pm:
gee, i guess someone missed this bit
Quote:The complaint does not specifically relate to the Welcome to Country or the Bible verse, according to Mr Pellowe, but rather his answer about the decision.
As usual, once you read past the headline you get to the truth.
Headline:
Preacher taken to Human Rights Commission after refusing to perform Welcome to Country
Subheading and first paragraph:
A Christian preacher says he has been hauled before the Human Rights Commission after refusing to perform the Welcome to Country.
Buried down the bottom:
The complaint does not specifically relate to the Welcome to Country or the Bible verse, according to Mr Pellowe, but rather his answer about the decision.
Ding ding ding, we have a winner.
Crank says crank poo, News Ltd reluctantly admit they don't have a verified story after they've nonetheless gotten clicks for it anyway.
So he gave a response as to why he wasn't doing a Welcome to Country...yes?
It was that response that the complainant didn't like ....
so in affect the Preacher was taken to task by the HRC for stating the reason he wouldn't perform
Welcome to Country.
Quote:Mr Pellowe claimed the man who raised the complaint had attended the May event, one of a series held across Queensland electorates in partnership with the [highlight]Australian Christian Lobby [/highlight](ACL), only to later complain that “I have racially vilified and humiliated him on the grounds of his race and religion”.
The complaint does not specifically relate to the Welcome to Country or the Bible verse, according to Mr Pellowe, but rather his answer about the decision.
“I don’t know if he’s some other religion or why he came to a Christian event to hear from a Christian teacher of Christian doctrine,” he told online news network ADH TV.
“The ubiquitousness of these Welcome to Country rituals being imposed upon Australians of all beliefs or non-belief at sporting events, when you land on a plane, when you walk into a government building, when you visit a website, when you start a Zoom meeting.
“These are religious rituals which Christians in particular should have no part of.
And under a democratic, allegedly secular and pluralistic society, it should also be something that the taxpayer doesn’t fund and the government doesn’t impose.
It’s the duty of Christians to preach the truth and gospel and to not mix Christianity with false religion, such as the Aboriginal traditional religion, which is bearing all the hallmarks of paganism … inherently false beliefs.”
So SACKA why was the complainant there? Huh huh.
Seems Aboriginals have rights that trump any rights that white people or Christians may have regarding their beliefs.