Australian Politics Forum - Preacher taken to Human Rights Commission

Bobby.

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 103136
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Preacher taken to Human Rights Commission
Reply #45 - Sep 1^st, 2024 at 9:20am

Laugh till you cry wrote on Sep 1^st, 2024 at 9:10am:

Bobby aspires to become a quisling?

Stop using a cheap, juvenile means of debate.

Argumentum Ad Hitlerum

The notoriously fallacious debate tactic 'Argumentum Ad Hitlerum' is a humorous corruption of the Latin phrase, Argumentum Ad Hominem, and is a form of guilt by association, where the object of abuse is compared to Adolf Hitler, the Nazi Party, or any number of peripheral parties, such as Neo-Nazis. Besides being a cheap, juvenile means of debate, it falls apart as quickly as any other form of guilt by association in rhetoric: Hitler was an ardent vegetarian; are all vegetarians therefore tantamount to Hitler? This fallacy is also known as 'Reductio Ad Nazium', from the 'Reductio Ad Absurdum' that should be well known to anyone familiar with the rigorous, axiomatic Greek method of mathematical proofs.

forgiven

namaste

╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯

Back to top

IP Logged

Laugh till you cry

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 16619
In your happy place
Gender: male

Re: Preacher taken to Human Rights Commission
Reply #46 - Sep 1^st, 2024 at 9:55am

Bobby. wrote on Sep 1^st, 2024 at 9:20am:

Laugh till you cry wrote on Sep 1^st, 2024 at 9:10am:

Bobby aspires to become a quisling?

Stop using a cheap, juvenile means of debate.

Argumentum Ad Hitlerum

The notoriously fallacious debate tactic 'Argumentum Ad Hitlerum' is a humorous corruption of the Latin phrase, Argumentum Ad Hominem, and is a form of guilt by association, where the object of abuse is compared to Adolf Hitler, the Nazi Party, or any number of peripheral parties, such as Neo-Nazis. Besides being a cheap, juvenile means of debate, it falls apart as quickly as any other form of guilt by association in rhetoric: Hitler was an ardent vegetarian; are all vegetarians therefore tantamount to Hitler? This fallacy is also known as 'Reductio Ad Nazium', from the 'Reductio Ad Absurdum' that should be well known to anyone familiar with the rigorous, axiomatic Greek method of mathematical proofs.

forgiven

namaste

╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯

Apolgies Bobby. I was unaware that your Ozpolitic franchise was granted exclusive rights to cheap, juvenile means of debate.

Back to top

Please don't thank me. Effusive fawning and obeisance of disciples, mendicants, and foot-kissers embarrass me.

IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 103136
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Preacher taken to Human Rights Commission
Reply #47 - Sep 1^st, 2024 at 4:32pm

Laugh till you cry wrote on Sep 1^st, 2024 at 9:55am:

Bobby. wrote on Sep 1^st, 2024 at 9:20am:

Laugh till you cry wrote on Sep 1^st, 2024 at 9:10am:

Bobby aspires to become a quisling?

Stop using a cheap, juvenile means of debate.

Argumentum Ad Hitlerum

The notoriously fallacious debate tactic 'Argumentum Ad Hitlerum' is a humorous corruption of the Latin phrase, Argumentum Ad Hominem, and is a form of guilt by association, where the object of abuse is compared to Adolf Hitler, the Nazi Party, or any number of peripheral parties, such as Neo-Nazis. Besides being a cheap, juvenile means of debate, it falls apart as quickly as any other form of guilt by association in rhetoric: Hitler was an ardent vegetarian; are all vegetarians therefore tantamount to Hitler? This fallacy is also known as 'Reductio Ad Nazium', from the 'Reductio Ad Absurdum' that should be well known to anyone familiar with the rigorous, axiomatic Greek method of mathematical proofs.

forgiven

namaste

╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯

Apologies Bobby. I was unaware that your Ozpolitic franchise was granted exclusive rights to cheap, juvenile means of debate.

My debates are always of high standard.

forgiven

namaste

╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯

Back to top

IP Logged

Bobby. Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 103136 Melbourne Gender:	Re: Preacher taken to Human Rights Commission Reply #48 - Sep 1^st, 2024 at 4:33pm Laugh till you cry wrote on Sep 1^st, 2024 at 9:10am: Bobby aspires to become a quisling? Raise you debating standards. forgiven namaste ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯
Back to top	IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 40938

Re: Preacher taken to Human Rights Commission
Reply #49 - Sep 1^st, 2024 at 4:36pm

Bobby. wrote on Sep 1^st, 2024 at 4:32pm:

Laugh till you cry wrote on Sep 1^st, 2024 at 9:55am:

Bobby. wrote on Sep 1^st, 2024 at 9:20am:

Laugh till you cry wrote on Sep 1^st, 2024 at 9:10am:

Bobby aspires to become a quisling?

Stop using a cheap, juvenile means of debate.

Argumentum Ad Hitlerum

The notoriously fallacious debate tactic 'Argumentum Ad Hitlerum' is a humorous corruption of the Latin phrase, Argumentum Ad Hominem, and is a form of guilt by association, where the object of abuse is compared to Adolf Hitler, the Nazi Party, or any number of peripheral parties, such as Neo-Nazis. Besides being a cheap, juvenile means of debate, it falls apart as quickly as any other form of guilt by association in rhetoric: Hitler was an ardent vegetarian; are all vegetarians therefore tantamount to Hitler? This fallacy is also known as 'Reductio Ad Nazium', from the 'Reductio Ad Absurdum' that should be well known to anyone familiar with the rigorous, axiomatic Greek method of mathematical proofs.

forgiven

namaste

╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯

Apologies Bobby. I was unaware that your Ozpolitic franchise was granted exclusive rights to cheap, juvenile means of debate.

My debates are always of high standard.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Sep 1^st, 2024 at 4:46pm by Brian Ross »

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Grappler Truth Teller Feller Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 83827 Proud pre-1850's NO Voter Gender:	Re: Preacher taken to Human Rights Commission Reply #50 - Sep 1^st, 2024 at 5:00pm Anyway - nobody has an obligation, legal or moral - to hold a welcome to your country thing... personal choice only. Nobody I know holds them - the council licks their nuts that way, but we tend to ignore them anyway.
Back to top	“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.” ― John Adams IP Logged

Gnads

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 29296
Gender: male

Re: Preacher taken to Human Rights Commission
Reply #51 - Sep 2^nd, 2024 at 6:46am

Laugh till you cry wrote on Sep 1^st, 2024 at 9:55am:

Bobby. wrote on Sep 1^st, 2024 at 9:20am:

Laugh till you cry wrote on Sep 1^st, 2024 at 9:10am:

Bobby aspires to become a quisling?

Stop using a cheap, juvenile means of debate.

Argumentum Ad Hitlerum

The notoriously fallacious debate tactic 'Argumentum Ad Hitlerum' is a humorous corruption of the Latin phrase, Argumentum Ad Hominem, and is a form of guilt by association, where the object of abuse is compared to Adolf Hitler, the Nazi Party, or any number of peripheral parties, such as Neo-Nazis. Besides being a cheap, juvenile means of debate, it falls apart as quickly as any other form of guilt by association in rhetoric: Hitler was an ardent vegetarian; are all vegetarians therefore tantamount to Hitler? This fallacy is also known as 'Reductio Ad Nazium', from the 'Reductio Ad Absurdum' that should be well known to anyone familiar with the rigorous, axiomatic Greek method of mathematical proofs.

forgiven

namaste

╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯

Apolgies Bobby. I was unaware that your Ozpolitic franchise was granted exclusive rights to cheap, juvenile means of debate.

You're a king at it..... a terrorist supporting POS hypocrite too.

Back to top

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 74257
Gender: male

Re: Preacher taken to Human Rights Commission
Reply #52 - Sep 2^nd, 2024 at 7:03am

Gnads wrote on Aug 31^st, 2024 at 4:32pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 31^st, 2024 at 11:15am:

Gnads wrote on Aug 30^th, 2024 at 11:56am:

So SACKA why was the complainant there? Huh huh. Roll Eyes

Why not? It wasn't a church service. It was a conference on 'church and state', something that affects all of us. You do realise that the term 'church and state' encompasses all religions, not just the ones you like, right?

And since when has Aboriginal Dreamtime belief been classed as a religion or church?

You've still got nothing.

classed by who? you? Cheesy

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 74257
Gender: male

Re: Preacher taken to Human Rights Commission
Reply #53 - Sep 2^nd, 2024 at 7:04am

Gnads wrote on Aug 31^st, 2024 at 4:33pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 31^st, 2024 at 11:19am:

Setanta wrote on Aug 30^th, 2024 at 7:54pm:

They are false,

as is the preachers faith ... but that's irrelevant.

He wasn't at a church service. He was at a conference discussing the relationship between church and state. It wasn't a platform for the preacher to peddle his crap

It was ... exactly it was, you dickhead.

No, it wasn't you dumbarse. It was a conference about the link between church and state. Something that affects us all, be you religious or not.

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 74257
Gender: male

Re: Preacher taken to Human Rights Commission
Reply #54 - Sep 2^nd, 2024 at 7:08am

freediver wrote on Sep 1^st, 2024 at 8:25am:

He would probably either ask that you leave or try to convince you otherwise

Bullshit. He'd have a hissy fit more like it.

freediver wrote on Sep 1^st, 2024 at 8:25am:

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/church

why do you leave out the rest of that definition FD? Worried it'll show you up for the dumbarse you are?

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48834
At my desk.

Re: Preacher taken to Human Rights Commission
Reply #55 - Sep 2^nd, 2024 at 7:20am

John Smith wrote on Sep 2^nd, 2024 at 7:08am:

freediver wrote on Sep 1^st, 2024 at 8:25am:

He would probably either ask that you leave or try to convince you otherwise

Bullshit. He'd have a hissy fit more like it.

People openly mock and criticise Christian beliefs all the time. I have never seen anyone react. Perhaps you are confusing them with Muslims. Mock Muhammad in a Muslim country and there is a good chance you will die.

Quote:

freediver wrote on Sep 1^st, 2024 at 8:25am:

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/church

why do you leave out the rest of that definition FD? Worried it'll show you up for the dumbarse you are?

I was showing that there was nothing wrong or unusual with Christians using the term church to refer to the church. Do you have a problem with them deciding for themselves what they mean when they use the word? I believe I made this pretty clear the first time I posted it. Why did you leave that bit out of your quote, only to ask me again?

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

Gnads

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 29296
Gender: male

Re: Preacher taken to Human Rights Commission
Reply #56 - Sep 2^nd, 2024 at 8:08am

John Smith wrote on Sep 2^nd, 2024 at 7:04am:

Gnads wrote on Aug 31^st, 2024 at 4:33pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 31^st, 2024 at 11:19am:

Setanta wrote on Aug 30^th, 2024 at 7:54pm:

They are false,

as is the preachers faith ... but that's irrelevant.

He wasn't at a church service. He was at a conference discussing the relationship between church and state. It wasn't a platform for the preacher to peddle his crap

It was ... exactly it was, you dickhead.

No, it wasn't you dumbarse. It was a conference about the link between church and state. Something that affects us all, be you religious or not.

Run by the ACL - Australian Christian Lobby.

Did you miss that bit knucklephuk?

Back to top

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 74257
Gender: male

Re: Preacher taken to Human Rights Commission
Reply #57 - Sep 2^nd, 2024 at 8:48am

freediver wrote on Sep 2^nd, 2024 at 7:20am:

People openly mock and criticise Christian beliefs all the time

Not at conferences where they are there to discuss religions they don't. I think you're confusing the situation with what you see on ozpol.

freediver wrote on Sep 2^nd, 2024 at 7:20am:

I was showing that there was nothing wrong or unusual with Christians using the term church to refer to the church.

there is nothing wrong with non Christians using the other accepted definitions of the word either ... your point?

freediver wrote on Sep 2^nd, 2024 at 7:20am:

Do you have a problem with them deciding for themselves what they mean when they use the word?

I have a problem with idiots trying to redefine words to suit their agenda. Neither you nor he are the arbiters of the definition of the word just because it doesn't suit your agenda.

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 74257 Gender:	Re: Preacher taken to Human Rights Commission Reply #58 - Sep 2^nd, 2024 at 8:49am Gnads wrote on Sep 2^nd, 2024 at 8:08am: Run by the ACL - Australian Christian Lobby. but not limited to christians dumbarse.... otherwise they would only invite christians to their wankfest.
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48834
At my desk.

Re: Preacher taken to Human Rights Commission
Reply #59 - Sep 2^nd, 2024 at 8:53am

Quote:

there is nothing wrong with non Christians using the other accepted definitions of the word either ... your point?

I believe I have made the point several times already. You keep leaving it out of your quote for some reason. Try reading it again John.

Quote:

I have a problem with idiots trying to redefine words to suit their agenda.

And by this you mean, Christians defining the word church to mean the very first definition of church given by the dictionary?

Quote:

Neither you nor he are the arbiters of the definition of the word just because it doesn't suit your agenda.

I am the final arbiter of what I mean when I use a term John. Not sure why this is such a difficult concept for you.

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged