freediver wrote on Sep 1
st, 2024 at 10:10am:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-09-01/bruce-highway-long-wait-to-reopen-after-truck-explosion/104295292
Quote:RACQ's general manager of advocacy Joshua Cooney said users of the "substandard" Bruce Highway were more likely to be involved in a serious collision than other comparable roads.
"It's unsafe. It's a two-star rating, according to established rating systems," he said.
This accident has nothing to do with the state of the Bruce Highway. That is deflection from the real issue. (maybe not from the RACQ, but others have said this)
The road surface was perfect at the scene and there was even solar powered street lighting. Fog was one factor, and driver error another. It could just as easily have happened driving through Brisbane motorways. However there is still the elephant in the room:
I want to know who on earth made the decision to transport Ammonium Nitrate
Emulsion on a major road from Central Queensland to a mine in NSW. It's not just ammonium nitrate or fertiliser. All you have to do is add a cocktail of impurities (soil and heat works quite well too) and it can be detonated. It already contains the oil. It is much much more likely to explode than Ammonium nitrate prill.
The only person brave (or naïve) enough to say that it was AN emulsion was the QFRS Incident Commander. None of the media reports include this information.
The decision was made many years ago to classify it as an oxidiser, as opposed to an explosive. After all, it was only going to be transported a short distance to the minesites.
It was a loud shudder. I thought an aircraft had crashed nearby, it was so loud.