I have read financial reports for over 40 years.
I like the 'dry' cautious approach, they are on the side of the economy.
They do not care who wins. This is their professional opinion.
Note for Kamala - ' .. The boost would narrowly outweigh any negative impact ......... '
Cautious prediction.
For trump, the same measured tone ' .. the hit to growth from tariffs and tighter immigration policy would outweigh the positive fiscal impulse,” .
By the way, tariffs are a bad thing. Quite regressive.
Quote:............ A report from the investment bank suggests Harris’ plan to assist middle class Americans and small business would increase consumer spending and create tens of thousands of jobs every month.
The boost would narrowly outweigh any negative impact of possible higher taxes Democrats might implement for the wealthy and big business, especially if they control Congress and block extending Trump’s giant 2017 tax cut. ............
............ “We estimate that if Trump wins in a sweep or with divided government, the hit to growth from tariffs and tighter immigration policy would outweigh the positive fiscal impulse,” Goldman analysts wrote. ......................
https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/goldman-sachs-says-kamala-harris-194000786.htm...