Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 
Send Topic Print
Conservatives against trump (Read 1923 times)
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 47220
Gender: male
Re: Conservatives against trump
Reply #45 - Sep 10th, 2024 at 12:27pm
 
SadKangaroo wrote on Sep 10th, 2024 at 10:41am:
Frank wrote on Sep 10th, 2024 at 10:13am:
The current US/NATO strategy is not working. It certainly does not stop Putin or the war.
Who benefits from it, other than arms manufacturers? Nobody.
Who loses from it? Ukrainians and Western tax payers.
Who would benefit from a ceasefire and negotiations? Ukrainians and Western taxpayers.
Who wants an end to this war? Trump.  But that, somehow, is being Putin's puppet.
Crazy.



That's some interesting mental gymnastics there.

Trump wants to end aid to Ukraine and has been supportive of Putin's actions in many way so far.

His admiration for Putin and criticism of US support for Ukraine has led to interpretations that he may be more favourable towards Russia's position in the conflict.

So what, he wants to end the war by having Putin win?

He's made no indication otherwise, in fact to the contrary.

So again, that's in Putin's favour...

Not helping your case.


It is simply not true that Trump "has been supportive of Putin's actions in many ways so far."
https://www.brookings.edu/articles/on-the-record-the-u-s-administrations-actions...

Nobody in the Western alliance has been supportive of Putin. China, Iran, North Korea have been, most third workers like India are turning a blind eye.

Like all geopolitical issues, this one is far more complex than your black and white 'interpretations'. It is certainly preferable to stop the shooting and start talking than simply wage a proxy war with no clear objectives. The West has done enough forever wars since WWII without winning any. 

Neither Russia nor Ukraine and NATO are as pure as driven snow in this conflict. It is a war of attrition that neither side can win. Advocating for a ceasefire and negotiations is certainly not an expression of "admiration for Putin".


What does Putin really want?
Back to top
« Last Edit: Sep 10th, 2024 at 12:37pm by Frank »  

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 138632
Gender: male
Re: Conservatives against trump
Reply #46 - Sep 10th, 2024 at 1:34pm
 
Frank wrote on Sep 10th, 2024 at 12:27pm:
SadKangaroo wrote on Sep 10th, 2024 at 10:41am:
Frank wrote on Sep 10th, 2024 at 10:13am:
The current US/NATO strategy is not working. It certainly does not stop Putin or the war.
Who benefits from it, other than arms manufacturers? Nobody.
Who loses from it? Ukrainians and Western tax payers.
Who would benefit from a ceasefire and negotiations? Ukrainians and Western taxpayers.
Who wants an end to this war? Trump.  But that, somehow, is being Putin's puppet.
Crazy.



That's some interesting mental gymnastics there.

Trump wants to end aid to Ukraine and has been supportive of Putin's actions in many way so far.

His admiration for Putin and criticism of US support for Ukraine has led to interpretations that he may be more favourable towards Russia's position in the conflict.

So what, he wants to end the war by having Putin win?

He's made no indication otherwise, in fact to the contrary.

So again, that's in Putin's favour...

Not helping your case.


It is simply not true that Trump "has been supportive of Putin's actions in many ways so far."


...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 74875
Gender: male
Re: Conservatives against trump
Reply #47 - Sep 10th, 2024 at 1:38pm
 
Karnal wrote on Sep 10th, 2024 at 11:12am:
Now now, Sad, back in 2016, the old boy was a naughty old Marxist. We need to crush the ESTABLISHMENT, he said. Now?

He's a peacenik. Ban the bomb, he says. USA go home. Ukraine can go suck Vlad's cock.

That's the old boy for you. He's a little bit shifty.

DEEP STATE !!!


Let's not forget, there was a time when Sore end wanted to shirt front putin   Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96249
Gender: male
Re: Conservatives against trump
Reply #48 - Sep 10th, 2024 at 2:44pm
 
John Smith wrote on Sep 10th, 2024 at 1:38pm:
Karnal wrote on Sep 10th, 2024 at 11:12am:
Now now, Sad, back in 2016, the old boy was a naughty old Marxist. We need to crush the ESTABLISHMENT, he said. Now?

He's a peacenik. Ban the bomb, he says. USA go home. Ukraine can go suck Vlad's cock.

That's the old boy for you. He's a little bit shifty.

DEEP STATE !!!


Let's not forget, there was a time when Sore end wanted to shirt front putin   Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy


Just so, JS. The old boy used to say what a nasty old meanie Putin is. He likes to turn, you see.

It leaves his grave in a right old mess, poor thing. Even in death, he shifts.

Always absolutely never ever.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Sep 10th, 2024 at 3:07pm by Karnal »  
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96249
Gender: male
Re: Conservatives against trump
Reply #49 - Sep 10th, 2024 at 3:02pm
 
Frank wrote on Sep 10th, 2024 at 12:27pm:
SadKangaroo wrote on Sep 10th, 2024 at 10:41am:
Frank wrote on Sep 10th, 2024 at 10:13am:
The current US/NATO strategy is not working. It certainly does not stop Putin or the war.
Who benefits from it, other than arms manufacturers? Nobody.
Who loses from it? Ukrainians and Western tax payers.
Who would benefit from a ceasefire and negotiations? Ukrainians and Western taxpayers.
Who wants an end to this war? Trump.  But that, somehow, is being Putin's puppet.
Crazy.



That's some interesting mental gymnastics there.

Trump wants to end aid to Ukraine and has been supportive of Putin's actions in many way so far.

His admiration for Putin and criticism of US support for Ukraine has led to interpretations that he may be more favourable towards Russia's position in the conflict.

So what, he wants to end the war by having Putin win?

He's made no indication otherwise, in fact to the contrary.

So again, that's in Putin's favour...

Not helping your case.


It is simply not true that Trump "has been supportive of Putin's actions in many ways so far."
https://www.brookings.edu/articles/on-the-record-the-u-s-administrations-actions...

Nobody in the Western alliance has been supportive of Putin. China, Iran, North Korea have been, most third workers like India are turning a blind eye.

Like all geopolitical issues, this one is far more complex than your black and white 'interpretations'. It is certainly preferable to stop the shooting and start talking than simply wage a proxy war with no clear objectives. The West has done enough forever wars since WWII without winning any. 

Neither Russia nor Ukraine and NATO are as pure as driven snow in this conflict. It is a war of attrition that neither side can win. Advocating for a ceasefire and negotiations is certainly not an expression of "admiration for Putin".


What does Putin really want?


Oh, yes it is. Ukraine never invaded Russia, you ridiculous old fool.

Nor has NATO, nor has Sleepy Joe. Vlad's unprovoked invasion of a sovereign European country is as black and white as it gets.

As your own DL says, if you don't protect your borders, you don't even have a country left anymore. You've parroted this statement many times. Trying to muddy the waters on the invasion of Ukraine is as spinelessly apologetic as you can get. 

You'll twist and turn and say and do whatever you're told. Ultimately, despite all your shifty handwringing puffery, you really only have one thing to say:

Yes, Master.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 47220
Gender: male
Re: Conservatives against trump
Reply #50 - Sep 10th, 2024 at 5:46pm
 
Karnal wrote on Sep 10th, 2024 at 3:02pm:
Frank wrote on Sep 10th, 2024 at 12:27pm:
SadKangaroo wrote on Sep 10th, 2024 at 10:41am:
Frank wrote on Sep 10th, 2024 at 10:13am:
The current US/NATO strategy is not working. It certainly does not stop Putin or the war.
Who benefits from it, other than arms manufacturers? Nobody.
Who loses from it? Ukrainians and Western tax payers.
Who would benefit from a ceasefire and negotiations? Ukrainians and Western taxpayers.
Who wants an end to this war? Trump.  But that, somehow, is being Putin's puppet.
Crazy.



That's some interesting mental gymnastics there.

Trump wants to end aid to Ukraine and has been supportive of Putin's actions in many way so far.

His admiration for Putin and criticism of US support for Ukraine has led to interpretations that he may be more favourable towards Russia's position in the conflict.

So what, he wants to end the war by having Putin win?

He's made no indication otherwise, in fact to the contrary.

So again, that's in Putin's favour...

Not helping your case.


It is simply not true that Trump "has been supportive of Putin's actions in many ways so far."
https://www.brookings.edu/articles/on-the-record-the-u-s-administrations-actions...

Nobody in the Western alliance has been supportive of Putin. China, Iran, North Korea have been, most third workers like India are turning a blind eye.

Like all geopolitical issues, this one is far more complex than your black and white 'interpretations'. It is certainly preferable to stop the shooting and start talking than simply wage a proxy war with no clear objectives. The West has done enough forever wars since WWII without winning any. 

Neither Russia nor Ukraine and NATO are as pure as driven snow in this conflict. It is a war of attrition that neither side can win. Advocating for a ceasefire and negotiations is certainly not an expression of "admiration for Putin".


What does Putin really want?


Oh, yes it is. Ukraine never invaded Russia, you ridiculous old fool.

Nor has NATO, nor has Sleepy Joe. Vlad's unprovoked invasion of a sovereign European country is as black and white as it gets.

As your own DL says, if you don't protect your borders, you don't even have a country left anymore. You've parroted this statement many times. Trying to muddy the waters on the invasion of Ukraine is as spinelessly apologetic as you can get. 

You'll twist and turn and say and do whatever you're told. Ultimately, despite all your shifty handwringing puffery, you really only have one thing to say:

Yes, Master.

Sounds like you have a quote where Trump supported the Russian attack on Ukraine.
Well, let's have it.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96249
Gender: male
Re: Conservatives against trump
Reply #51 - Sep 10th, 2024 at 5:50pm
 
Frank wrote on Sep 10th, 2024 at 5:46pm:
Karnal wrote on Sep 10th, 2024 at 3:02pm:
Frank wrote on Sep 10th, 2024 at 12:27pm:
SadKangaroo wrote on Sep 10th, 2024 at 10:41am:
Frank wrote on Sep 10th, 2024 at 10:13am:
The current US/NATO strategy is not working. It certainly does not stop Putin or the war.
Who benefits from it, other than arms manufacturers? Nobody.
Who loses from it? Ukrainians and Western tax payers.
Who would benefit from a ceasefire and negotiations? Ukrainians and Western taxpayers.
Who wants an end to this war? Trump.  But that, somehow, is being Putin's puppet.
Crazy.



That's some interesting mental gymnastics there.

Trump wants to end aid to Ukraine and has been supportive of Putin's actions in many way so far.

His admiration for Putin and criticism of US support for Ukraine has led to interpretations that he may be more favourable towards Russia's position in the conflict.

So what, he wants to end the war by having Putin win?

He's made no indication otherwise, in fact to the contrary.

So again, that's in Putin's favour...

Not helping your case.


It is simply not true that Trump "has been supportive of Putin's actions in many ways so far."
https://www.brookings.edu/articles/on-the-record-the-u-s-administrations-actions...

Nobody in the Western alliance has been supportive of Putin. China, Iran, North Korea have been, most third workers like India are turning a blind eye.

Like all geopolitical issues, this one is far more complex than your black and white 'interpretations'. It is certainly preferable to stop the shooting and start talking than simply wage a proxy war with no clear objectives. The West has done enough forever wars since WWII without winning any. 

Neither Russia nor Ukraine and NATO are as pure as driven snow in this conflict. It is a war of attrition that neither side can win. Advocating for a ceasefire and negotiations is certainly not an expression of "admiration for Putin".


What does Putin really want?


Oh, yes it is. Ukraine never invaded Russia, you ridiculous old fool.

Nor has NATO, nor has Sleepy Joe. Vlad's unprovoked invasion of a sovereign European country is as black and white as it gets.

As your own DL says, if you don't protect your borders, you don't even have a country left anymore. You've parroted this statement many times. Trying to muddy the waters on the invasion of Ukraine is as spinelessly apologetic as you can get. 

You'll twist and turn and say and do whatever you're told. Ultimately, despite all your shifty handwringing puffery, you really only have one thing to say:

Yes, Master.

Sounds like you have a quote where Trump supported the Russian attack on Ukraine.
Well, let's have it.



I went in yesterday and there was a television screen, and I said, ‘This is genius.’ Putin declares a big portion of the Ukraine — of Ukraine — Putin declares it as independent. Oh, that’s wonderful. He used the word ‘independent’ and ‘we’re gonna go out and we’re gonna go in and we’re gonna help keep peace.’ You gotta say that’s pretty savvy.

You.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 47220
Gender: male
Re: Conservatives against trump
Reply #52 - Sep 10th, 2024 at 6:27pm
 
Karnal wrote on Sep 10th, 2024 at 5:50pm:


Roll the tape:


BUCK: Mr. President, in the last 24 hours we know Russia has said that they are recognizing two breakaway regions of Ukraine, and now this White House is stating that this is an “invasion.” That’s a strong word. What went wrong here? What has the current occupant of the Oval Office done that he could have done differently?

PRESIDENT TRUMP: Well, what went wrong was a rigged election and what went wrong is a candidate that shouldn’t be there and a man that has no concept of what he’s doing. I went in yesterday and there was a television screen, and I said, “This is genius.” Putin declares a big portion of the Ukraine — of Ukraine. Putin declares it as independent. Oh, that’s wonderful. (sarcastic)

So, Putin is now saying, “It’s independent,” a large section of Ukraine. I said, “How smart is that?” And he’s gonna go in and be a peacekeeper. That’s strongest peace force… We could use that on our southern border. That’s the strongest peace force I’ve ever seen. There were more army tanks than I’ve ever seen. They’re gonna keep peace all right. No, but think of it. Here’s a guy who’s very savvy… I know him very well. Very, very well.

By the way, this never would have happened with us. Had I been in office, not even thinkable. This would never have happened. But here’s a guy that says, you know, “I’m gonna declare a big portion of Ukraine independent,” he used the word “independent,” “and we’re gonna go out and we’re gonna go in and we’re gonna help keep peace.” You gotta say that’s pretty savvy. And you know what the response was from Biden? There was no response. They didn’t have one for that. No, it’s very sad. Very sad.
https://www.clayandbuck.com/president-trump-with-cb-from-mar-a-lago
Back to top
« Last Edit: Sep 10th, 2024 at 6:38pm by Frank »  

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 47220
Gender: male
Re: Conservatives against trump
Reply #53 - Sep 10th, 2024 at 6:44pm
 
Frank wrote on Sep 10th, 2024 at 6:27pm:
Karnal wrote on Sep 10th, 2024 at 5:50pm:


Roll the tape:


BUCK: Mr. President, in the last 24 hours we know Russia has said that they are recognizing two breakaway regions of Ukraine, and now this White House is stating that this is an “invasion.” That’s a strong word. What went wrong here? What has the current occupant of the Oval Office done that he could have done differently?

PRESIDENT TRUMP: Well, what went wrong was a rigged election and what went wrong is a candidate that shouldn’t be there and a man that has no concept of what he’s doing. I went in yesterday and there was a television screen, and I said, “This is genius.” Putin declares a big portion of the Ukraine — of Ukraine. Putin declares it as independent. Oh, that’s wonderful. (sarcastic)

So, Putin is now saying, “It’s independent,” a large section of Ukraine. I said, “How smart is that?” And he’s gonna go in and be a peacekeeper. That’s strongest peace force… We could use that on our southern border. That’s the strongest peace force I’ve ever seen. There were more army tanks than I’ve ever seen. They’re gonna keep peace all right. No, but think of it. Here’s a guy who’s very savvy… I know him very well. Very, very well.

By the way, this never would have happened with us. Had I been in office, not even thinkable. This would never have happened. But here’s a guy that says, you know, “I’m gonna declare a big portion of Ukraine independent,” he used the word “independent,” “and we’re gonna go out and we’re gonna go in and we’re gonna help keep peace.” You gotta say that’s pretty savvy. And you know what the response was from Biden? There was no response. They didn’t have one for that. No, it’s very sad. Very sad.
https://www.clayandbuck.com/president-trump-with-cb-from-mar-a-lago

CLAY: No doubt, 7.5%. Mr. President, I’m gonna read you a tweet here from Joe Biden. This is almost exactly two years ago. “Vladimir Putin doesn’t want me to be president. He doesn’t want me to be our nominee. If you’re wondering why, it’s because I’m the only person in this field who’s ever gone toe-to-toe with him.”

PRESIDENT TRUMP: Yeah.

CLAY: Almost two years to the day. Putin has invaded in Ukraine. Under Obama, Putin invaded as well. All the talk about your relationship with Vladimir Putin, and he certainly didn’t try that with you. Why is he doing it to Biden? What do you think of Biden’s bluster, that tweet that has not been reflected in the reality on the ground?

PRESIDENT TRUMP: Well, even “Sleepy Eyes” Chuck Todd said this weekend during his show — I was watching it for a change and he said — (summarized), “How come there’s been no invasion during the period of time that the Trump administration was there but they did invade — very severely invade — with Obama and then they waited and then they invaded?”

This would never have happened if we were there. But he did. Chuck Todd asked that question. How come there was none of this happening during the Trump administration? I knew Putin very well. I got along with him great. He liked me. I liked him. I mean, you know, he’s a tough cookie, got a lot of the great charm and a lot of pride. But the way he — and he loves his country, you know? He loves his country. He’s acting a little differently I think now.

I think he sees this opportunity. I knew that he always wanted Ukraine. I used to talk to him about it. I said, “You can’t do it. You’re not gonna do it.” But I could see that he wanted it. I used to ask him. We used to talk about it at length. I think nobody probably knows him better in terms of the discussions that we have or that we’re having this morning. So, I knew him very well. I got to know him. I got to know President Xi. By the way, China is gonna be next. You know, China is gonna —
...
PRESIDENT TRUMP: Well, Buck, I love the country. I have never seen anything like what’s happening right now, and everything I’ve said is correct. I said about the energy; he killed the energy the first day. I mean, the first day! The first thing he did was kill the Keystone pipeline, Keystone XL pipeline, and he never said he was gonna do that. He said, “We’ll look at it. We’ll…” He looked at it for, what, two hours?

What he’s done is so devastating. You know, people don’t realize that I stopped the Russian pipeline. It was dead. He came in and he immediately let it proceed, and it’s one of the reasons — the money is so enormous! I mean, that was amazing. The biggest thing they’ve ever done, Russian pipeline, more money, billions and billions of dollars a day, billions of dollars a week pouring in. I stopped it, totally stopped it.

Putin even said, “You’re killing me on the pipeline.” I said, “Sorry, I have no choice. It’s wrong.” Okay. He approves it. But then they say, “Oh, Trump was nice to Russia!” I wasn’t nice to Russia. And, by the way, I do to want get along. I think getting along with Russia is a great thing.
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Mortdooley
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7149
Texas Gulf Coast
Gender: male
Re: Conservatives against trump
Reply #54 - Sep 10th, 2024 at 8:27pm
 
Tulsi Gabbard Destroys Cheney Endorsement: "A Vote For Kamala Harris Is A Vote For Dick Cheney"

by Tyler Durden
Sunday, Sep 08, 2024 - 02:45 PM
Tucker Carlson's Live Tour show in Colorado Springs, CO on Saturday featured Tulsi Gabbard among his many guests. The former Democrat Rep turned Republican/conservative commentator is an Army Reserve officer and has for years been outspoken in condemning the Washington national security state's lust for war even as common Americans suffer the effects at home of spending billions in foreign adventurism and failed nation-building abroad.

The great thing about the timing of her appearance on Carlson's Live Tour is that she took the stage just after Dick Cheney and his daughter Liz, both "lifelong Republicans", issued full-throated endorsements of Kamala Harris for president, while also blasting "depraved human being" Donald Trump.

83-year old former Vice President Cheney, who oversaw with GW Bush the invasion of Iraq and overthrow of Saddam Hussein, said in his Saturday statement: "In our nation’s 248-year history, there has never been an individual who is a greater threat to our republic than Donald Trump."

Gabbard blasted the endorsement, and the fact that Harris said she was honored and proud to receive it from the Cheney family, by pointing out he was the architect of two decades of failed wars in the Middle East.

What makes Tulsi's perspective all the more powerful is that she herself has been personally impacted as a longtime Army officer. This is in contrast with the Cheney's and their neocon associates, who have never served in the nation's armed forces (Ron Paul aptly called these types chickenhawks).

Below are some of the highlights of Tulsi Gabbard's reaction to Dick Cheney's ringing endorsement of VP Harris for president...

"I have a very simple message for my Democrat friends, my independent friends, and those who may not be sure about who they're voting for in this election. Dick Cheney has just made the choice very clear"...

"A vote for Kamala Harris is a vote for Dick Cheney, the architect of everything that has gone wrong in the Middle East for the last few decades," Gabbard emphasized.

— Alex Thompson (@AlexThomp) September 7, 2024
"Her [Harris'] response to the Dick Cheney announcement today was that she was honored to have his endorsement, and we got military veterans in the house, got a lot of you who probably served in the Middle East like I did, and so it sickened me."

Gabbard continued, "Tucker, to read those words today from Dick Cheney, Liz Cheney, and Kamala Harris because we have people who we care very much about who were killed in those wars because of Dick Cheney."

"Kamala Harris has told us all we need to know about what kind of Commander-in-Chief she would be, and I don't know about you, but I would not trust her for a moment with the lives of my brothers and sisters in uniform," she concluded.
Back to top
 

The only difference between a Communist and a Democrat is the spelling.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 138632
Gender: male
Re: Conservatives against trump
Reply #55 - Sep 10th, 2024 at 9:31pm
 

10. Defendant Trump initiated sexual contact with Plaintiff at four different parties.
On the fourth and final sexual encounter with Defendant Trump, Defendant Trump tied Plaintiff
to a bed, exposed himself to Plaintiff, and then proceeded to forcibly rape Plaintiff. During the
course of this savage sexual attack, Plaintiff loudly pleaded with Defendant Trump to stop but
with no effect. Defendant Trump responded to Plaintiff’s pleas by violently striking Plaintiff in
the face with his open hand and screaming that he would do whatever he wanted. Exhs. A and B.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 47220
Gender: male
Re: Conservatives against trump
Reply #56 - Sep 10th, 2024 at 9:50pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 10th, 2024 at 9:31pm:
10. Defendant Trump initiated sexual contact with Plaintiff at four different parties.
On the fourth and final sexual encounter with Defendant Trump, Defendant Trump tied Plaintiff
to a bed, exposed himself to Plaintiff, and then proceeded to forcibly rape Plaintiff. During the
course of this savage sexual attack, Plaintiff loudly pleaded with Defendant Trump to stop but
with no effect. Defendant Trump responded to Plaintiff’s pleas by violently striking Plaintiff in
the face with his open hand and screaming that he would do whatever he wanted. Exhs. A and B.

Zzz......

...
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Sprintcyclist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 40763
Gender: male
Re: Conservatives against trump
Reply #57 - Sep 10th, 2024 at 10:06pm
 
trump has not been endorsed by a single ex pres of his party.
Even his VP has not endorsed him.


Kamala has been endorsed by every ex pres of her party
Back to top
 

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 47220
Gender: male
Re: Conservatives against trump
Reply #58 - Sep 10th, 2024 at 10:28pm
 
Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 10th, 2024 at 10:06pm:
trump has not been endorsed by a single ex pres of his party.
Even his VP has not endorsed him.


Kamala has been endorsed by every ex pres of her party

And you are drawing the entirely wrong conclusion from that.
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96249
Gender: male
Re: Conservatives against trump
Reply #59 - Sep 10th, 2024 at 11:15pm
 
Frank wrote on Sep 10th, 2024 at 6:27pm:
Karnal wrote on Sep 10th, 2024 at 5:50pm:


Roll the tape:


BUCK: Mr. President, in the last 24 hours we know Russia has said that they are recognizing two breakaway regions of Ukraine, and now this White House is stating that this is an “invasion.” That’s a strong word. What went wrong here? What has the current occupant of the Oval Office done that he could have done differently?

PRESIDENT TRUMP: Well, what went wrong was a rigged election and what went wrong is a candidate that shouldn’t be there and a man that has no concept of what he’s doing. I went in yesterday and there was a television screen, and I said, “This is genius.” Putin declares a big portion of the Ukraine — of Ukraine. Putin declares it as independent. Oh, that’s wonderful. (sarcastic)

So, Putin is now saying, “It’s independent,” a large section of Ukraine. I said, “How smart is that?” And he’s gonna go in and be a peacekeeper. That’s strongest peace force… We could use that on our southern border. That’s the strongest peace force I’ve ever seen. There were more army tanks than I’ve ever seen. They’re gonna keep peace all right. No, but think of it. Here’s a guy who’s very savvy… I know him very well. Very, very well.

By the way, this never would have happened with us. Had I been in office, not even thinkable. This would never have happened. But here’s a guy that says, you know, “I’m gonna declare a big portion of Ukraine independent,” he used the word “independent,” “and we’re gonna go out and we’re gonna go in and we’re gonna help keep peace.” You gotta say that’s pretty savvy. And you know what the response was from Biden? There was no response. They didn’t have one for that. No, it’s very sad. Very sad.
https://www.clayandbuck.com/president-trump-with-cb-from-mar-a-lago


Yes, Master.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 
Send Topic Print