Bobby. wrote on Sep 11
th, 2024 at 7:25pm:
SadKangaroo wrote on Sep 11
th, 2024 at 7:19pm:
Bobby. wrote on Sep 11
th, 2024 at 5:01pm:
SadKangaroo wrote on Sep 11
th, 2024 at 4:53pm:
Bobby. wrote on Sep 11
th, 2024 at 4:34pm:
You realise "aced it" means he made no mistakes, he had a perfect score.
Did you not watch the debate?
He clearly didn't ace it.
he aced it.
Your IQ is lower than I thought.
That's the fallacy of
argumentum ad hominem.
https://www.ozpolitic.com/articles/logical-fallacies.html#ad%20hominem ad hominem"You are an idiot, therefore you are wrong."
An ad hominem (short for argumentum ad hominem) is a personal attack. It is by far the most common logical fallacy encountered in online forums. It carries the assumption that by discrediting your opponent, you are also discrediting their argument. However, this would lead to the absurd situation that an argument is correct if one person uses it, and false if another uses it. Inexperienced debaters often fall for this and feel the need to defend their reputation against
a troll, otherwise it will invalidate the point they are trying to make in the eyes of others.
You are deluded if you genuinely believe he 'aced' that debate.
Persisting in this fantasy reveals one of two things: either you're incapable of understanding basic reality, or you're a sad little troll grasping for attention. I generously assumed at first that you're just intellectually deficient.
Harris toyed with him effortlessly, reducing him from a fleeting moment of faux-presidential composure to his true, pathetic self, spouting lies, turning red, drenched in sweat, and unravelling before our eyes. That wasn't a triumph; it was a meltdown of epic proportions.
If you still think he aced it, then your cognitive faculties are even more limited than I originally imagined. You predicted he'd ace it, and despite the humiliating spectacle he made of himself, you cling to your delusion.
Your inability to face facts either points to a serious deficiency in intelligence or a conscious choice to wallow in willful ignorance.
I've extended you the courtesy of assuming the former out of pity. But the alternative, that you're trolling for the sake of it, reflects a level of worthlessness that's even harder to pity.