Frank wrote on Sep 12
th, 2024 at 9:00pm:
I was specific
Yes you were,
Frank wrote on Sep 12
th, 2024 at 1:38pm:
Where was the falsehood in my posts in this thread?
And I so graciously provided you with the answers you so demanded,
SadKangaroo wrote on Sep 12
th, 2024 at 2:00pm:
Here we go,
Frank wrote on Sep 11
th, 2024 at 6:19pm:
So the chaps at Feeding Our Future, rather than feeding Minnesota kids, fed themselves, very lavishly.
Lie. The "chaps" at "Feeding Our Future" is the US Department of Agriculture and no, they didn't.
Quote:In June, five of these enterprising go-getters were convicted in federal court. Their names:
Abdiaziz Shafii Farah
Mohamed Jama Ismail
Abdimajid Mohamed Nur
Mukhtar Mohamed Shariff
Hayat Mohamed Nur
Lie. They were not part of Feeding Our Future but external contractors. These men formed a non-profit and defrauded Minessota Department of Education who was overseeing the roll out of funds and meals within the state.
Quote:Among Feeding Our Future's ingenious wheezes was the purchase of vacation properties in the countries they're supposed to be refugees from.
Lie. It was not anyone within Feeding Our Future, but again the external non-profit that was committing fraud.
Quote:So Tim Walz's Department of Education bought holiday homes for Mohammedan fraudsters with US tax dollars.
Lie. That did not happen. Again, the non-profit org that defrauded the state did.
And your thread title, suggests Walz stole from children's charities?
Firstly, the program isn't charity, it's a federal initiative to provide meals to children in need that was administered by the states, that had to quickly expand during COVID as Schools and Community centres closed down so they could still supply meals to those children who relied on it from within their own homes.
It was this process that was exploited by those criminals who stole from the state and those children and who have rightly been brought to justice.
But you want to suggest that Walz was stealing from children's charities?
There are multiple lies and that baseless implications that you need to correct, if the truth matters to you even in the slightest.
Your safe space is crumbling again.
Since that post, you've employed every tactic imaginable to sidestep acknowledging the obvious. You're caught in a loop, endlessly regurgitating the same points, as though repetition could somehow undo the facts laid out before you.
Given how clearly traumatised you are by this reality, I’ll extend a courtesy you’ve done nothing to deserve, but I’m feeling uncharacteristically charitable. I’ll offer you the mercy of letting it go, since it’s abundantly clear to everyone here what’s transpired, no amount of deflection will change that.
At this stage, I doubt even you're managing to fool yourself.
If I deign to engage with you again, I’ll be sure to remember your aversion to reality and respond with the level of respect that befits such a mindset.
After all, it is R U OK Day, a time to support those struggling with mental health. Consider this my small contribution to those in crisis. Don’t say I’ve never done anything for you.
I shall accept your white flag.
Forum
Pages: 
