Australian Politics Forum - WA and the National Firearms Agreement

Baronvonrort

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 18476
Gender: male

Re: WA and the National Firearms Agreement
Reply #135 - Nov 10^th, 2024 at 10:55pm

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 10^th, 2024 at 10:11pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Nov 10^th, 2024 at 10:05pm:

It's a taxpayer funded buyback from gun dealers.
These dealers can only sell them to people the police have approved so it will do nothing for public safety.

Apart from air rifles and air pistols not much if anything in gun shops under $1000 brand new.

A quality rimfire like Anshutz are over $3k

There is nothing in this new legislation that deals with criminals using illegal guns.

The sheeple have been brainwashed into guns are bad so they don't question stupid new laws that cost taxpayers a fortune while not doing anything apart from giving a perception they're doing something.

Another non-Law Abiding gun owner then? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

What laws have i broken Bwhine?

Looking to get a 28 Nosler for longer range shots on feral pigs we can have them in NSW

Back to top

28Nosler-TGLR-Ammo-Label-Size6.jpg (66 KB | 4 )

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.

IP Logged

Sir Eoin O Fada

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2236
New England, NSW
Gender: male

Re: WA and the National Firearms Agreement
Reply #136 - Nov 11^th, 2024 at 7:58am

Brian, you said,
‘’ The laws were passed after Port Arthur in 1996. The Australian people agreed to them in the next election and every election since, Eugene. You claim that you lot are, "law abiding" so why are going against the will of the democratic majority of Australians? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes’’
Where and when was the consultation?

We are law abiding, in fact licensed firearm owners are one of the most law abiding groups in the country.
When we protest against the firearms laws we are exercising our democratic right to object, in case you didn’t know.

Back to top

Self defence is a right.

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 41839

Re: WA and the National Firearms Agreement
Reply #137 - Nov 11^th, 2024 at 10:28am

Sir Eoin O Fada wrote on Nov 11^th, 2024 at 7:58am:

Brian, you said,
‘’ The laws were passed after Port Arthur in 1996. The Australian people agreed to them in the next election and every election since, Eugene. You claim that you lot are, "law abiding" so why are going against the will of the democratic majority of Australians? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes’’
Where and when was the consultation?

We are law abiding, in fact licensed firearm owners are one of the most law abiding groups in the country.
When we protest against the firearms laws we are exercising our democratic right to object, in case you didn’t know.

There was more than sufficient consultation before the introduction of the firearm laws after Port Arthur but your ears and your eyes were collectively closed. You refused to listen to the Governments when they said enough was enough. You protested, you had idiots proclaim that "the streets would run with blood", you had fools claim they were going to bury their guns rather than sell them to the Government. Gun owners were anything but law abiding. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Back to top

« Last Edit: Nov 11^th, 2024 at 4:08pm by Brian Ross »

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 41839

Re: WA and the National Firearms Agreement
Reply #138 - Nov 11^th, 2024 at 10:32am

Baronvonrort wrote on Nov 10^th, 2024 at 10:55pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 10^th, 2024 at 10:11pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Nov 10^th, 2024 at 10:05pm:

It's a taxpayer funded buyback from gun dealers.
These dealers can only sell them to people the police have approved so it will do nothing for public safety.

Apart from air rifles and air pistols not much if anything in gun shops under $1000 brand new.

A quality rimfire like Anshutz are over $3k

There is nothing in this new legislation that deals with criminals using illegal guns.

The sheeple have been brainwashed into guns are bad so they don't question stupid new laws that cost taxpayers a fortune while not doing anything apart from giving a perception they're doing something.

Another non-Law Abiding gun owner then? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

What laws have i broken Bwhine?

You are proposing that gun owners disobey the law. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Setanta

Gold Member

Offline

\/ Peace man!

Posts: 16588
Northern NSW
Gender: male

Re: WA and the National Firearms Agreement
Reply #139 - Nov 11^th, 2024 at 12:52pm

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 11^th, 2024 at 10:28am:

Sir Eoin O Fada wrote on Nov 11^th, 2024 at 7:58am:

Brian, you said,
‘’ The laws were passed after Port Arthur in 1996. The Australian people agreed to them in the next election and every election since, Eugene. You claim that you lot are, "law abiding" so why are going against the will of the democratic majority of Australians? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes’’
Where and when was the consultation?

We are law abiding, in fact licensed firearm owners are one of the most law abiding groups in the country.
When we protest against the firearms laws we are exercising our democratic right to object, in case you didn’t know.

There was more than sufficient consultation before the introduction of the firarm laws after Port Arthur but your ears and your eyes were collectively closed. You refused to listen to the Governments when they said enough was enough. You protested, you had idiots proclaim that "the streets would run with blood", you had fools claim they were going to bury their guns rather than sell them to the Government. Gun owners were anything but law abiding. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

All of them Brian? Much like all Muslims bad? You're a hypocrite. Do you even know any firearm owners?

Back to top

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 41839

Re: WA and the National Firearms Agreement
Reply #140 - Nov 11^th, 2024 at 4:10pm

Setanta wrote on Nov 11^th, 2024 at 12:52pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 11^th, 2024 at 10:28am:

Sir Eoin O Fada wrote on Nov 11^th, 2024 at 7:58am:

Brian, you said,
‘’ The laws were passed after Port Arthur in 1996. The Australian people agreed to them in the next election and every election since, Eugene. You claim that you lot are, "law abiding" so why are going against the will of the democratic majority of Australians? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes’’
Where and when was the consultation?

We are law abiding, in fact licensed firearm owners are one of the most law abiding groups in the country.
When we protest against the firearms laws we are exercising our democratic right to object, in case you didn’t know.

There was more than sufficient consultation before the introduction of the firarm laws after Port Arthur but your ears and your eyes were collectively closed. You refused to listen to the Governments when they said enough was enough. You protested, you had idiots proclaim that "the streets would run with blood", you had fools claim they were going to bury their guns rather than sell them to the Government. Gun owners were anything but law abiding. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

All of them Brian? Much like all Muslims bad? You're a hypocrite. Do you even know any firearm owners?

I've known quite few over the years, Setanta. Some have been loons most have been good. Eugene wants them to disobey the law, despite claiming he is, "law abiding." Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Baronvonrort

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 18476
Gender: male

Re: WA and the National Firearms Agreement
Reply #141 - Nov 11^th, 2024 at 6:02pm

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 11^th, 2024 at 10:32am:

Baronvonrort wrote on Nov 10^th, 2024 at 10:55pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 10^th, 2024 at 10:11pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Nov 10^th, 2024 at 10:05pm:

It's a taxpayer funded buyback from gun dealers.
These dealers can only sell them to people the police have approved so it will do nothing for public safety.

Apart from air rifles and air pistols not much if anything in gun shops under $1000 brand new.

A quality rimfire like Anshutz are over $3k

There is nothing in this new legislation that deals with criminals using illegal guns.

The sheeple have been brainwashed into guns are bad so they don't question stupid new laws that cost taxpayers a fortune while not doing anything apart from giving a perception they're doing something.

Another non-Law Abiding gun owner then? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

What laws have i broken Bwhine?

You are proposing that gun owners disobey the law. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Cite where i have proposed gun owners disobey the law or did you pluck that from your arse?

Bwhine the bullshitter tsk tsk tsk Roll Eyes

Back to top

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 41839

Re: WA and the National Firearms Agreement
Reply #142 - Nov 11^th, 2024 at 6:15pm

Baronvonrort wrote on Nov 11^th, 2024 at 6:02pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 11^th, 2024 at 10:32am:

Baronvonrort wrote on Nov 10^th, 2024 at 10:55pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 10^th, 2024 at 10:11pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Nov 10^th, 2024 at 10:05pm:

It's a taxpayer funded buyback from gun dealers.
These dealers can only sell them to people the police have approved so it will do nothing for public safety.

Apart from air rifles and air pistols not much if anything in gun shops under $1000 brand new.

A quality rimfire like Anshutz are over $3k

There is nothing in this new legislation that deals with criminals using illegal guns.

The sheeple have been brainwashed into guns are bad so they don't question stupid new laws that cost taxpayers a fortune while not doing anything apart from giving a perception they're doing something.

Another non-Law Abiding gun owner then? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

What laws have i broken Bwhine?

You are proposing that gun owners disobey the law. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Cite where i have proposed gun owners disobey the law or did you pluck that from your arse?

Bwhine the bullshitter tsk tsk tsk Roll Eyes

Oh, dearie, dearie, me, here Baron, here. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Baronvonrort

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 18476
Gender: male

Re: WA and the National Firearms Agreement
Reply #143 - Nov 11^th, 2024 at 6:31pm

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 11^th, 2024 at 6:15pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Nov 11^th, 2024 at 6:02pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 11^th, 2024 at 10:32am:

Baronvonrort wrote on Nov 10^th, 2024 at 10:55pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 10^th, 2024 at 10:11pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Nov 10^th, 2024 at 10:05pm:

It's a taxpayer funded buyback from gun dealers.
These dealers can only sell them to people the police have approved so it will do nothing for public safety.

Apart from air rifles and air pistols not much if anything in gun shops under $1000 brand new.

A quality rimfire like Anshutz are over $3k

There is nothing in this new legislation that deals with criminals using illegal guns.

The sheeple have been brainwashed into guns are bad so they don't question stupid new laws that cost taxpayers a fortune while not doing anything apart from giving a perception they're doing something.

Another non-Law Abiding gun owner then? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

What laws have i broken Bwhine?

You are proposing that gun owners disobey the law. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Cite where i have proposed gun owners disobey the law or did you pluck that from your arse?

Bwhine the bullshitter tsk tsk tsk Roll Eyes

Oh, dearie, dearie, me, here Baron, here. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

That is not encouraging people to break the law it's pointing out what the government has offered to pay gun dealers to buyback guns is far less than what they cost or are worth.

You have nothing i see why everyone abandoned your debate and relate forum Roll Eyes

Back to top

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.

IP Logged

Sir Eoin O Fada

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2236
New England, NSW
Gender: male

Re: WA and the National Firearms Agreement
Reply #144 - Nov 11^th, 2024 at 7:01pm

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 11^th, 2024 at 10:28am:

Sir Eoin O Fada wrote on Nov 11^th, 2024 at 7:58am:

Brian, you said,
‘’ The laws were passed after Port Arthur in 1996. The Australian people agreed to them in the next election and every election since, Eugene. You claim that you lot are, "law abiding" so why are going against the will of the democratic majority of Australians? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes’’
Where and when was the consultation?

We are law abiding, in fact licensed firearm owners are one of the most law abiding groups in the country.
When we protest against the firearms laws we are exercising our democratic right to object, in case you didn’t know.

There was more than sufficient consultation before the introduction of the firearm laws after Port Arthur but your ears and your eyes were collectively closed. You refused to listen to the Governments when they said enough was enough. You protested, you had idiots proclaim that "the streets would run with blood", you had fools claim they were going to bury their guns rather than sell them to the Government. Gun owners were anything but law abiding. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

There was no consultation, if there had been then many of the resulting stupid laws would have been argued over with the probability that many of the subsequent changes would not have been necessary.
The ‘’blood will run in the streets’’ was as I remember made by the wife of a well known politician of the time, but I’m open to correction, just give a reference if you would be so kind.

Back to top

Self defence is a right.

IP Logged

lee Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 17621 Gender:	Re: WA and the National Firearms Agreement Reply #145 - Nov 11^th, 2024 at 7:21pm Brian Ross wrote on Nov 11^th, 2024 at 6:15pm: Oh, dearie, dearie, me, here Baron, here. If you follow that link there is nothing about breaking the law. Bwian the Bullsch!t king.
Back to top	IP Logged

Sir Eoin O Fada

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2236
New England, NSW
Gender: male

Re: WA and the National Firearms Agreement
Reply #146 - Nov 11^th, 2024 at 7:23pm

Brian,
While on the subject, you know as well as I do that circumventing a proposed law is not breaking the law.

Licensed firearm owners are, as I said, among the most law abiding citizens, the fact that they are trusted by the various Governments to possess lethal weapons, particularly pistols, is proof enough.

Back to top

Self defence is a right.

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 41839

Re: WA and the National Firearms Agreement
Reply #147 - Nov 11^th, 2024 at 7:52pm

Baronvonrort wrote on Nov 11^th, 2024 at 6:31pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 11^th, 2024 at 6:15pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Nov 11^th, 2024 at 6:02pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 11^th, 2024 at 10:32am:

Baronvonrort wrote on Nov 10^th, 2024 at 10:55pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 10^th, 2024 at 10:11pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Nov 10^th, 2024 at 10:05pm:

It's a taxpayer funded buyback from gun dealers.
These dealers can only sell them to people the police have approved so it will do nothing for public safety.

Apart from air rifles and air pistols not much if anything in gun shops under $1000 brand new.

A quality rimfire like Anshutz are over $3k

There is nothing in this new legislation that deals with criminals using illegal guns.

The sheeple have been brainwashed into guns are bad so they don't question stupid new laws that cost taxpayers a fortune while not doing anything apart from giving a perception they're doing something.

Another non-Law Abiding gun owner then? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

What laws have i broken Bwhine?

You are proposing that gun owners disobey the law. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Cite where i have proposed gun owners disobey the law or did you pluck that from your arse?

Bwhine the bullshitter tsk tsk tsk Roll Eyes

Oh, dearie, dearie, me, here Baron, here. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

That is not encouraging people to break the law it's pointing out what the government has offered to pay gun dealers to buyback guns is far less than what they cost or are worth.

You mean their over-inflated prices that they paid for their toys, Baron? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 41839

Re: WA and the National Firearms Agreement
Reply #148 - Nov 11^th, 2024 at 8:03pm

Sir Eoin O Fada wrote on Nov 11^th, 2024 at 7:01pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 11^th, 2024 at 10:28am:

Sir Eoin O Fada wrote on Nov 11^th, 2024 at 7:58am:

Brian, you said,
‘’ The laws were passed after Port Arthur in 1996. The Australian people agreed to them in the next election and every election since, Eugene. You claim that you lot are, "law abiding" so why are going against the will of the democratic majority of Australians? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes’’
Where and when was the consultation?

We are law abiding, in fact licensed firearm owners are one of the most law abiding groups in the country.
When we protest against the firearms laws we are exercising our democratic right to object, in case you didn’t know.

There was more than sufficient consultation before the introduction of the firearm laws after Port Arthur but your ears and your eyes were collectively closed. You refused to listen to the Governments when they said enough was enough. You protested, you had idiots proclaim that "the streets would run with blood", you had fools claim they were going to bury their guns rather than sell them to the Government. Gun owners were anything but law abiding. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

There was no consultation, if there had been then many of the resulting stupid laws would have been argued over with the probability that many of the subsequent changes would not have been necessary.
The ‘’blood will run in the streets’’ was as I remember made by the wife of a well known politician of the time, but I’m open to correction, just give a reference if you would be so kind.

It was Ian McNiven:

So much for being, "law abiding," Eugene. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 41839

Re: WA and the National Firearms Agreement
Reply #149 - Nov 11^th, 2024 at 8:04pm

lee wrote on Nov 11^th, 2024 at 7:21pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 11^th, 2024 at 6:15pm:

Oh, dearie, dearie, me, here Baron, here.

If you follow that link there is nothing about breaking the law. Bwian the Bullsch!t king. Grin

Oh, dearie, dearie, me, he is proposing to move firearms out of the state, rather than surrender them to the authorities, Lee. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged