Tut, tut Phil, so vulgar, the more educated among us use the term ‘’Richard Cranium’’ in lieu of ‘’dickhead’’.

What don’t you and the WA Government not understand about the word ‘’agreement”?

Why did you say that self obsessed arseholes have a right to possess firearms?

You did say “ Only self obsessed arsehole would put their right to own a gunbefore the right to . . . .’’ ,did you not?

philperth2010 wrote on Oct 10^th, 2024 at 4:59pm:

Where am I complaining?
I’m only pointing out that the NFA is not an agreement.

‘’ Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more
agreement
/əˈɡriːm(ə)nt/
noun
harmony or accordance in opinion or feeling.
"the two officers nodded in agreement"
Similar:
a negotiated and typically legally binding arrangement between parties as to a course of action.’’

Can you tell me how forcing a person to get rid of a replica of a 1720 design of musket makes WA a safer State?

Bye the way, arseholes are essential to society, also known as the fundamental orifice, “funda’’ for short, they ensure health and contentment.

Sir Eoin O Fada wrote on Oct 10^th, 2024 at 6:15pm:


The agreement allowes States the right to change firearms laws....The ageement sets a minimum standard....What is your problem???

Sir Eoin O Fada wrote on Oct 10^th, 2024 at 9:52pm:



What I said was "Only self obsessed arsehole would put their right to own a gun before the right to protect the public from gun violence"....That would be you arsehole....Someone can own up to ten guns if they have a need and meet the criteria....The ageement states - Nothing in the agreement prevents juristictions from adopting additional - including more restrictive - regulations....So your argument is complete bullshit as usual....Guns are a privellege not a right in Australia and States have every right to dictate what and how many firearms any individual can own....This is not America dickhead....Your only argument is you do not like the laws not that they have been broken in any way!!!

You did say “ Only self obsessed arsehole would put their right to own a gunbefore the right to . . . .’’ ,did you not?

Therefore, logically you think that these self obsessed arseholes have gun rights or you lack English proficiency, can’t have it both ways.

You have successfully demonstrated that the National Firearms Agreement is not an agreement but aload of bull.

You said nought about the absurdity of forcing a person to give up a replica of a 1720 designed single shot muzzle loading musket.
How does owning one 1720 musket over the arbitrary limit in any way threaten the safety of Western Australians?

Don’t just repeat that the WA Government can do what it wants, tell us why you think it necessary.

WA Gun laws have always been wonky and lack sense. The .303 ban before the NFA is a case in point. I think my grandfather and then my father had the only not drilled and filled .303 in WA. A Lee-Metford held on a curio license until my father got dementia(Lewy Body Dementia), now my youngest in QLD has it and my fathers other firearms but it has to be on a Category B and WA no longer has a Curio license.

Sir Eoin O Fada wrote on Oct 11^th, 2024 at 7:07pm:


Who by....You???

Care to post a link to support this argument and let us know exactly who is comparing WA gun laws to Nazi Germany???