Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print
Tax cuts for Billionaires (Read 1035 times)
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 73969
Gender: male
Re: Tax cuts for Billionaires
Reply #45 - Oct 1st, 2024 at 2:46pm
 
Karnal wrote on Oct 1st, 2024 at 2:41pm:
Aquascoot cut out the first part of his source's sentence:



So he's not only a dumbarse, but a dishonest one  Cheesy Cheesy
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 94665
Gender: male
Re: Tax cuts for Billionaires
Reply #46 - Oct 1st, 2024 at 2:52pm
 
John Smith wrote on Oct 1st, 2024 at 1:20pm:
aquascoot wrote on Oct 1st, 2024 at 12:02pm:
hey mort

have you noticed smith and fisk are completely ignorant  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


the United States impose a property tax, also known as a millage rate, as a principal source of revenue.[1] This tax may be imposed on real estate or personal property. The tax is nearly always computed as the fair market value of the property, multiplied by an assessment ratio, multiplied by a tax rate, and is generally an obligation of the owner of the property. Values are determined by local officials, and may be disputed by property owners. For the taxing authority, one advantage of the property tax over the sales tax or income tax is that the revenue always equals the tax levy, unlike the other types of taxes. The property tax typically produces the required revenue for municipalities' tax levies. One disadvantage to the taxpayer is that the tax liability is fixed, while the taxpayer's income is not.



Not a federal tax you dumbarse Grin Grin


Not even a tax. A levy on ratepayers that funds garbage collection and local council services.

Cunning, no?

Mort's trying to pretend a corporate tax on assets is designed to tax the family home.

Aquascoot's trying to pretend the feds tax homeowners.

Both are trying to pretend presidents have anything to do with tax at all. Taxation is legislated by Congress. You can understand Aquascoot getting that one wrong, but Mort?

All those Ethics classes in school seem to have fallen on deaf ears. Who knows?

Maybe Mort was sick when they covered the American Revolution: no taxation without representation.

And maybe Aquascoot thinks his bills from the Moreton Bay Council are sent out by the socialists down in Canberra.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 1st, 2024 at 2:59pm by Karnal »  
 
IP Logged
 
Mortdooley
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6949
Texas Gulf Coast
Gender: male
Re: Tax cuts for Billionaires
Reply #47 - Oct 1st, 2024 at 7:34pm
 
Karnal wrote on Oct 1st, 2024 at 2:52pm:
John Smith wrote on Oct 1st, 2024 at 1:20pm:
aquascoot wrote on Oct 1st, 2024 at 12:02pm:
hey mort

have you noticed smith and fisk are completely ignorant  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


the United States impose a property tax, also known as a millage rate, as a principal source of revenue.[1] This tax may be imposed on real estate or personal property. The tax is nearly always computed as the fair market value of the property, multiplied by an assessment ratio, multiplied by a tax rate, and is generally an obligation of the owner of the property. Values are determined by local officials, and may be disputed by property owners. For the taxing authority, one advantage of the property tax over the sales tax or income tax is that the revenue always equals the tax levy, unlike the other types of taxes. The property tax typically produces the required revenue for municipalities' tax levies. One disadvantage to the taxpayer is that the tax liability is fixed, while the taxpayer's income is not.



Not a federal tax you dumbarse Grin Grin


Not even a tax. A levy on ratepayers that funds garbage collection and local council services.

Cunning, no?

Mort's trying to pretend a corporate tax on assets is designed to tax the family home.

Aquascoot's trying to pretend the feds tax homeowners.

Both are trying to pretend presidents have anything to do with tax at all. Taxation is legislated by Congress. You can understand Aquascoot getting that one wrong, but Mort?

All those Ethics classes in school seem to have fallen on deaf ears. Who knows?

Maybe Mort was sick when they covered the American Revolution: no taxation without representation.

And maybe Aquascoot thinks his bills from the Moreton Bay Council are sent out by the socialists down in Canberra.



No I didn't, you claim that the family home is not a asset so has no value.

When the Presidency and the Congress are both controlled by the same political Party what the President proposes is generally going to be voted on and passed by Congress.

We have representation, very deaf to our best interest but it does exist on paper.
Back to top
 

The only difference between a Communist and a Democrat is the spelling.
 
IP Logged
 
Mortdooley
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6949
Texas Gulf Coast
Gender: male
Re: Tax cuts for Billionaires
Reply #48 - Oct 1st, 2024 at 7:36pm
 
Marla wrote on Oct 1st, 2024 at 12:17am:
Appears moron torty loves Communism


Dunning–Kruger once again raises its head.
Back to top
 

The only difference between a Communist and a Democrat is the spelling.
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 94665
Gender: male
Re: Tax cuts for Billionaires
Reply #49 - Oct 1st, 2024 at 9:14pm
 
Mortdooley wrote on Oct 1st, 2024 at 7:34pm:
Karnal wrote on Oct 1st, 2024 at 2:52pm:
John Smith wrote on Oct 1st, 2024 at 1:20pm:
aquascoot wrote on Oct 1st, 2024 at 12:02pm:
hey mort

have you noticed smith and fisk are completely ignorant  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


the United States impose a property tax, also known as a millage rate, as a principal source of revenue.[1] This tax may be imposed on real estate or personal property. The tax is nearly always computed as the fair market value of the property, multiplied by an assessment ratio, multiplied by a tax rate, and is generally an obligation of the owner of the property. Values are determined by local officials, and may be disputed by property owners. For the taxing authority, one advantage of the property tax over the sales tax or income tax is that the revenue always equals the tax levy, unlike the other types of taxes. The property tax typically produces the required revenue for municipalities' tax levies. One disadvantage to the taxpayer is that the tax liability is fixed, while the taxpayer's income is not.



Not a federal tax you dumbarse Grin Grin


Not even a tax. A levy on ratepayers that funds garbage collection and local council services.

Cunning, no?

Mort's trying to pretend a corporate tax on assets is designed to tax the family home.

Aquascoot's trying to pretend the feds tax homeowners.

Both are trying to pretend presidents have anything to do with tax at all. Taxation is legislated by Congress. You can understand Aquascoot getting that one wrong, but Mort?

All those Ethics classes in school seem to have fallen on deaf ears. Who knows?

Maybe Mort was sick when they covered the American Revolution: no taxation without representation.

And maybe Aquascoot thinks his bills from the Moreton Bay Council are sent out by the socialists down in Canberra.



No I didn't, you claim that the family home is not a asset so has no value.

When the Presidency and the Congress are both controlled by the same political Party what the President proposes is generally going to be voted on and passed by Congress.

We have representation, very deaf to our best interest but it does exist on paper.


No, dear, I claimed the family home is not a tax-deductable business asset for companies earning over $200 million.

You claimed Karmala's planning on taxing your home. Do you want to change that claim?

Or do you want to join Aquascoot pretending the White House collects your local council rates?

His selective edit shows he knows he's lying.

In for a penny in for a pound, eh?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Mortdooley
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6949
Texas Gulf Coast
Gender: male
Re: Tax cuts for Billionaires
Reply #50 - Oct 2nd, 2024 at 7:48pm
 
Quote:
No, dear, I claimed the family home is not a tax-deductable business asset for companies earning over $200 million.

You claimed Karmala's planning on taxing your home. Do you want to change that claim?


Since there is no federal property tax kameltoe has to find a new way to raise revenue over the equity homes build over time. You're just using weasel words to try to change the argument. $200 million has nothing to do with the value of a families home. $200 million is a distraction, that is how it starts but it doesn't stop there. Everything will be subject to an unrealized capital gain if it can get through the Congress. You want the government to tax someone else so you can get the benefits from it, I understand. I'm already among those who pay so others can get an undeserved free ride at our expense. I oppose an unrealized capital gains tax on anyone at anytime. The democrats will always find more creative ways to take more of the income of the people.
Back to top
 

The only difference between a Communist and a Democrat is the spelling.
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 94665
Gender: male
Re: Tax cuts for Billionaires
Reply #51 - Oct 2nd, 2024 at 11:08pm
 
Mortdooley wrote on Oct 2nd, 2024 at 7:48pm:
Quote:
No, dear, I claimed the family home is not a tax-deductable business asset for companies earning over $200 million.

You claimed Karmala's planning on taxing your home. Do you want to change that claim?


Since there is no federal property tax kameltoe has to find a new way to raise revenue over the equity homes build over time. You're just using weasel words to try to change the argument. $200 million has nothing to do with the value of a families home. $200 million is a distraction, that is how it starts but it doesn't stop there. Everything will be subject to an unrealized capital gain if it can get through the Congress. You want the government to tax someone else so you can get the benefits from it, I understand. I'm already among those who pay so others can get an undeserved free ride at our expense. I oppose an unrealized capital gains tax on anyone at anytime. The democrats will always find more creative ways to take more of the income of the people.


Weasel words, is it?

Turning a proposed tax on billionaires into a universal "property" tax is all above board. But suggesting Karmala said nothing of the kind is sinister and underhanded.

We've got to hand it to you, Mort, you're most cunning, but I'm curious. Who do you think is going to buy that?

Aquascoot's disappeared - poof! Baron, Bobi, all gone, leaving you with your dick in your hand, lubed and ready to go.

So unfair, eh?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 73969
Gender: male
Re: Tax cuts for Billionaires
Reply #52 - Oct 3rd, 2024 at 12:35pm
 
Mortdooley wrote on Oct 2nd, 2024 at 7:48pm:
Since there is no federal property tax kameltoe has to find a new way to raise revenue over the equity homes build over time. You're just using weasel words to try to change the argument.



no need to cry just because you've been spanked Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 94665
Gender: male
Re: Tax cuts for Billionaires
Reply #53 - Oct 3rd, 2024 at 3:07pm
 
John Smith wrote on Oct 3rd, 2024 at 12:35pm:
Mortdooley wrote on Oct 2nd, 2024 at 7:48pm:
Since there is no federal property tax kameltoe has to find a new way to raise revenue over the equity homes build over time. You're just using weasel words to try to change the argument.



no need to cry just because you've been spanked Roll Eyes


Imagine, Kameltoe sneaks a housing tax into her corporate tax plan. The Republican-controlled Congress votes it in, MAGA Mike Johnson bangs his gavel and rubber stamps it: good to go, leftards.

That's the alternate reality Mort's pretending to live in.

RIGGED !!!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Mortdooley
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6949
Texas Gulf Coast
Gender: male
Re: Tax cuts for Billionaires
Reply #54 - Oct 4th, 2024 at 9:14pm
 
John Smith wrote on Oct 3rd, 2024 at 12:35pm:
Mortdooley wrote on Oct 2nd, 2024 at 7:48pm:
Since there is no federal property tax kameltoe has to find a new way to raise revenue over the equity homes build over time. You're just using weasel words to try to change the argument.



no need to cry just because you've been spanked Roll Eyes


Arab proverb, once you allow a camel to stick its nose under your tent, the camel is bound to end up inside. Thus, a seemingly minor decision will have much wider, undesirable consequences.


I know you don't understand because the current proposal doesn't effect the average person yet and anyway the rich have too much money and need to be punished for it. We hear over and over the rich need to pay their fair share, it seems their fair share is all of it. No matter what it is. Price control, rent control, taxing equity, raising taxes on production. Taxing money that has already been taxed. You just don't see the pattern here, the government needs to spend less, not tax more.

Some time ago I read the autobiography of J Paul Getty and this reminds me of his chapter on people asking for money. "Mr. Getty you have so much and it wouldn't hurt you to send me ten thousand dollars and it would make such a difference in my life." If you guessed he didn't send any money you would be right. Our government isn't much different than that opportunist, it seems to think we are Getty.


Quote:
The camel's nose is a metaphor for a situation where the permitting of a small, seemingly innocuous act will open the door for larger, clearly undesirable actions.
Back to top
 

The only difference between a Communist and a Democrat is the spelling.
 
IP Logged
 
Mortdooley
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6949
Texas Gulf Coast
Gender: male
Re: Tax cuts for Billionaires
Reply #55 - Oct 4th, 2024 at 9:17pm
 
Karnal wrote on Oct 3rd, 2024 at 3:07pm:
John Smith wrote on Oct 3rd, 2024 at 12:35pm:
Mortdooley wrote on Oct 2nd, 2024 at 7:48pm:
Since there is no federal property tax kameltoe has to find a new way to raise revenue over the equity homes build over time. You're just using weasel words to try to change the argument.



no need to cry just because you've been spanked Roll Eyes


Imagine, Kameltoe sneaks a housing tax into her corporate tax plan. The Republican-controlled Congress votes it in, MAGA Mike Johnson bangs his gavel and rubber stamps it: good to go, leftards.

That's the alternate reality Mort's pretending to live in.

RIGGED !!!



End goal, you will own nothing. You will be the one owned, read history. It's not like it hasn't happened before in other places.
Back to top
 

The only difference between a Communist and a Democrat is the spelling.
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 94665
Gender: male
Re: Tax cuts for Billionaires
Reply #56 - Oct 5th, 2024 at 12:47am
 
Mortdooley wrote on Oct 4th, 2024 at 9:17pm:
Karnal wrote on Oct 3rd, 2024 at 3:07pm:
John Smith wrote on Oct 3rd, 2024 at 12:35pm:
Mortdooley wrote on Oct 2nd, 2024 at 7:48pm:
Since there is no federal property tax kameltoe has to find a new way to raise revenue over the equity homes build over time. You're just using weasel words to try to change the argument.



no need to cry just because you've been spanked Roll Eyes


Imagine, Kameltoe sneaks a housing tax into her corporate tax plan. The Republican-controlled Congress votes it in, MAGA Mike Johnson bangs his gavel and rubber stamps it: good to go, leftards.

That's the alternate reality Mort's pretending to live in.

RIGGED !!!



End goal, you will own nothing. You will be the one owned, read history. It's not like it hasn't happened before in other places.


That's the conspiritard's go-to, dear.

Okay, so I may have made it all up, but we'll have to wait and see what happens.

It may not happen overnight but it will happen, no?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 73969
Gender: male
Re: Tax cuts for Billionaires
Reply #57 - Oct 5th, 2024 at 9:20am
 
Mortdooley wrote on Oct 4th, 2024 at 9:14pm:
John Smith wrote on Oct 3rd, 2024 at 12:35pm:
Mortdooley wrote on Oct 2nd, 2024 at 7:48pm:
Since there is no federal property tax kameltoe has to find a new way to raise revenue over the equity homes build over time. You're just using weasel words to try to change the argument.



no need to cry just because you've been spanked Roll Eyes


Arab proverb, once you allow a camel to stick its nose under your tent, the camel is bound to end up inside. Thus, a seemingly minor decision will have much wider, undesirable consequences.


I know you don't understand because the current proposal doesn't effect the average person yet and anyway the rich have too much money and need to be punished for it. We hear over and over the rich need to pay their fair share, it seems their fair share is all of it. No matter what it is. Price control, rent control, taxing equity, raising taxes on production. Taxing money that has already been taxed. You just don't see the pattern here, the government needs to spend less, not tax more.

Some time ago I read the autobiography of J Paul Getty and this reminds me of his chapter on people asking for money. "Mr. Getty you have so much and it wouldn't hurt you to send me ten thousand dollars and it would make such a difference in my life." If you guessed he didn't send any money you would be right. Our government isn't much different than that opportunist, it seems to think we are Getty.


Quote:
The camel's nose is a metaphor for a situation where the permitting of a small, seemingly innocuous act will open the door for larger, clearly undesirable actions.



save your tears for someone who gives a crap. You were either bullshitting, or you just don't understand YOUR tax system and and got caught  so you got spanked for it ... take it like a man
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12191
Gender: male
Re: Tax cuts for Billionaires
Reply #58 - Oct 5th, 2024 at 1:12pm
 
Baronvonrort wrote on Sep 27th, 2024 at 6:17pm:
Quote:
How much income tax do the top earners pay?


Most of the government’s federal income tax revenue comes from the nation’s top income earners. In 2021, the top 5% of earners — people with incomes $252,840 and above — collectively paid over $1.4 trillion in income taxes, or about 66% of the national total. If you include the top 10% — everyone who made at least $169,800 — that figure rises to $1.7 trillion, or 76% of the total.

https://usafacts.org/articles/who-pays-the-most-income-tax/

The top 5% account for 66% of taxes raised.

How much would be acceptable to the forum commies?


Re government spending: the acceptable minimum is ensuring universal access to good housing, education (including healthy living basics), and above-poverty employment.

Obviously,  in a resource-rich nation, to avoid the devastating consequences of welfare dependency and entrenched (generational) socio-economic disadvanatge. 

As to how much taxation, and who pays to fund  government spending: in order to avoid the endless political bunfight, here's an alternative:

https://findingmoneyfilm.com/

FINDING THE MONEY follows economist Stephanie Kelton on a journey through Modern Money Theory or “MMT”. Kelton provocatively asserts the National Debt Clock that ticks ominously upwards in New York City is not actually a debt for us taxpayers at all, nor a burden for our grandchildren to pay back. Instead, Kelton describes the national debt as simply a historical record of the number of dollars created by the US federal government currently being held in pockets, as assets, by the rest of us.

MMT bursts into the media with journalists asking, “Have we been thinking about how the government spends money, all wrong?” But top economists from across the political spectrum condemn the theory as “voodoo economics”, “crazy” and “a crackpot theory”.

FINDING THE MONEY traces the conflict all the way back to the story we tell about money, injecting new hope and empowering countries around the world to tackle the biggest challenges of the 21st century: from climate change to inequality.


No "commies" required,  just morality, justice and fairness.




   
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 5th, 2024 at 1:24pm by thegreatdivide »  
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print