Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 ... 36
Send Topic Print
Lowering the age of crim responsibility (Read 9536 times)
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17644
Gender: male
Re: Lowering the age of crim responsibility
Reply #225 - Nov 5th, 2024 at 9:14pm
 
thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 5th, 2024 at 11:23am:
At what age a person is responsible, is a diversion from the CAUSE of criminal behaviour, eg bad role models in welfare dependent communities and families.


No Diversion. Under your scheme they will never be responsible until your wish list is completely fulfilled. How many tears do you think? Roll Eyes

thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 5th, 2024 at 11:23am:
Wrong again:  I have always agreed personal responsibility (for acceptable behaviour) is ONE part of the set of necessary conditions required to achieve social cohesion and harmony.   


But ONLY if all your wishes are fulfilled. Roll Eyes

thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 5th, 2024 at 11:23am:
But you of course are blind to other OTHER necessary conditions, eg, an economy which works for all - because you are blinded by the Conservative "poverty is always with us" meme.


And yet there are many who live in "poverty" who don't feel the need to break the law. Roll Eyes

thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 5th, 2024 at 11:23am:
Again, you ignore the effect of the external environment; systemic poverty is a mitigating factor re 'responsibility'.   


No it is not. Poverty doesn't require you to break the law. Roll Eyes

thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 5th, 2024 at 11:23am:
Addressed and refuted above. Locking people up won't reduce crime among disadvantaged socio-economic groups.


You haven't refuted anything. People living in poverty don't all feel the need to break the law.  Roll Eyes

thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 5th, 2024 at 11:23am:
(You restricting the issues to black crime?  Another error.)



Really? Where did I raise the colour bar? That is just supposition on your part. The same as your posts on what will work and what won't.

thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 5th, 2024 at 11:23am:
I already asked you (and explained - which you ignore because you believe poverty is always with us):  why did the parents commit crimes, and consequently were such poor role models for their kids, regardless of whether the courts locked the parents up or not? 


So why do rich people commit crimes and are consequently poor role models for their kids? Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 84664
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: Lowering the age of crim responsibility
Reply #226 - Nov 7th, 2024 at 9:34am
 
Given their restrictive upbringing - maybe there is an argument that ten year old Aboriginal children are not capable of making a valid judgement of right and wrong.  If they are so physically neglected that the rates of Removal - after a long, drawn-out, and strenuous process and not just at the drop of a hat - for neglect and abuse - surely they have had little to no opportunity to see or learn the difference between right and wrong.

Nobody has shown them the ropes - and we are talking about those who turn to criminal activity, not all of them, dorks - so they cannot know right from wrong, and so are not PERSONALLY responsible at that age - so perhaps there is a need to look at setting parents straight by Early Intervention with them.  How any government could go about that is beyond me - and it is clearly very 'paternalistic', and so would draw the most incredible criticism.

Damned if they do and damned if they don't.... so at some point someone has to draw a hard line and say - 'no more'!

You can argue the merits of the NT decision on early dispatch to reform school...... which is what this is - not 'sending them to prison'...

Maybe governments could consider the Park plan, wherein the residents - initially at least - go to live there because they want to 'do things their way' (though what these kids get up to shows what that means in reality far too often) - and perhaps these kids could get their minds right from being taught the True Ways etc.  (snark remark)  They could even learn how to run Safaris and hunting!!

I've known some Elders who have great ideas, but no avenues for putting them in place... the equivalent of the Kokoda Trail for instance - taking the young people along the traditional route between highland and coast, a seasonal thing, showing them the resources etc along the way... and how to eat and live etc (well - back-pack some cans of baked beans - you can live on it but it tastes like poo - some garlic to go with the yabbies)...

In any case - something has to be done - and nobody is listening to the wiser heads up there - your Jacinta Prices and such... you can take the kid out of the abusive family  but you can never take the abusive family out of the kid once it is entrenched .... so somewhere, somehow, you have to start with the adults....

Ideas without rancour, children??   Be better and less paranoid and less divisive and exclusive....
Back to top
 

Exclusion_005.jpg (78 KB | 2 )
Exclusion_005.jpg

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12952
Gender: male
Re: Lowering the age of crim responsibility
Reply #227 - Nov 7th, 2024 at 11:35am
 
lee wrote on Nov 5th, 2024 at 9:14pm:
But ONLY if all your wishes are fulfilled. Roll Eyes
 

My wish to remove the causes of socioeconomic-related criminality?

Guilty as charged. 

Quote:
And yet there are many who live in "poverty" who don't feel the need to break the law. Roll Eyes


Ah - another bit of the blind, Conservative "poverty is always with us" meme.

1.  No need for the parenthesis re systemic "poverty" - it's real.

2. Some people can maintain social functionality in genteel "poverty"; others are crippled by systemicpoverty:

"You are living in poverty, your neighborhoods are like war zones, your young men are in prison..."
D. Trump, before the 2016 election.

Quote:
No it is not. Poverty doesn't require you to break the law. Roll Eyes


But it does weaken responsibility, as Trump recognized. 

Quote:
Really? Where did I raise the colour bar? That is just supposition on your part.


lee: ...
"unless you teach them "it is all whartey's fault".
 

Early-stage dementia?

Quote:
So why do rich people commit crimes and are consequently poor role models for their kids? Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin


Greed, which may or may not be emulated by the kids; and individual greed-related crime in wealthy communities is different to widespread crime in poverty ghettos  (see Trump's comment). 
Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 7th, 2024 at 12:11pm by thegreatdivide »  
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12952
Gender: male
Re: Lowering the age of crim responsibility
Reply #228 - Nov 7th, 2024 at 12:08pm
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Nov 7th, 2024 at 9:34am:
Given their restrictive upbringing - maybe there is an argument that ten year old Aboriginal children are not capable of making a valid judgement of right and wrong.  If they are so physically neglected that the rates of Removal - after a long, drawn-out, and strenuous process and not just at the drop of a hat - for neglect and abuse - surely they have had little to no opportunity to see or learn the difference between right and wrong.


Observe  graps, unlike lee, opening his mind....

Quote:
Nobody has shown them the ropes - and we are talking about those who turn to criminal activity, not all of them, dorks - so they cannot know right from wrong, and so are not PERSONALLY responsible at that age - so perhaps there is a need to look at setting parents straight by Early Intervention with them.  How any government could go about that is beyond me - and it is clearly very 'paternalistic', and so would draw the most incredible criticism.


It's beyond governments crippled by the current neoclassical economic orthodoxy which pits taxpayers against taxpayers.

But there IS another way, to enable resource mobilization for the benefit of all - NOT "paternalism".

https://findingmoneyfilm.com/

'Finding the money'

Quote:
Damned if they do and damned if they don't.... so at some point someone has to draw a hard line and say - 'no more'!


Yes, we must hope the current babble of mainstream economists are swept into the dustbin of history before too long; maybe Trump's certain failure (before the mid terms) to MAGA for all the people who elected him, will hasten the process, after proving neither Trump's nor the mainstream (dem/repub) economic policies work. 

Quote:
You can argue the merits of the NT decision on early dispatch to reform school...... which is what this is - not 'sending them to prison'...


Yes.

Quote:
I've known some Elders who have great ideas, but no avenues for putting them in place... the equivalent of the Kokoda Trail for instance -


Alright for a few jobs, but the fact is most will have to be shown how  to prosper in the modern economy - welfare dependency is not an acceptable model.

Quote:
In any case - something has to be done - and nobody is listening to the wiser heads up there - your Jacinta Prices and such... you can take the kid out of the abusive family  but you can never take the abusive family out of the kid once it is entrenched .... so somewhere, somehow, you have to start with the adults....


Yes, but Price is an IPA "freemarket" ideologue, so "what can be done" is already very limited by the free-market's  allocation of resources. 

Quote:
Ideas without rancour, children??   Be better and less paranoid and less divisive and exclusive....


Me and lee?   He's the ultimate blind, Conservative  'poverty is always with us' market ideologue.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 7th, 2024 at 12:16pm by thegreatdivide »  
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 84664
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: Lowering the age of crim responsibility
Reply #229 - Nov 7th, 2024 at 5:31pm
 
My mind has always been open - it is you lot who restrict discussion to what you see as 'black and white' issues and who run around doing most of the name-calling - I give it back to you, turkeys...

If some of you would just stick to the issues instead of 'megaphoning' everyone with your hate speech, more information could be discussed and exchanged... but as long as you want to play trench warfare - I'm your man.
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17644
Gender: male
Re: Lowering the age of crim responsibility
Reply #230 - Nov 7th, 2024 at 7:37pm
 
thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 7th, 2024 at 11:35am:
My wish to remove the causes of socioeconomic-related criminality?


Np your wish is to somehow reduce all criminality, until your wishes are met. No age limit because "failed parents". Roll Eyes

thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 7th, 2024 at 11:35am:
1.  No need for the parenthesis re systemic "poverty" - it's real.


Yes it is.

thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 7th, 2024 at 11:35am:
2. Some people can maintain social functionality in genteel "poverty"; others are crippled by systemicpoverty:


There is no such thing as "genteel poverty". Are homeless people living in "genteel poverty? Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 7th, 2024 at 11:35am:
"You are living in poverty, your neighborhoods are like war zones, your young men are in prison..."
D. Trump, before the 2016 election.

Quote:


Oh dear. Now he claims Don knows all. Grin Grin Grin Grin

thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 7th, 2024 at 11:35am:
But it does weaken responsibility, as Trump recognized.


No it doesn't. You are still responsible for your life choices, no one forces you to do anything.

thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 7th, 2024 at 11:35am:
lee: ..."unless you teach them "it is all whartey's fault".



So SE Asians are not treated as "whartey's"? But they are not white. Winkthegreatdivide wrote on Nov 7th, 2024 at 11:35am:
Early-stage dementia?

Not from me. From YOU, who can tell?

thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 7th, 2024 at 11:35am:
Greed, which may or may not be emulated by the kids; and individual greed-related crime in wealthy communities is different to widespread crime in poverty ghettos


That's an assumption. You get greed related crime in ghettos. It is why "gangsta's" thrive. Shocked

You really are a half-trick pony. Grin Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12952
Gender: male
Re: Lowering the age of crim responsibility
Reply #231 - Nov 8th, 2024 at 10:56am
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Nov 7th, 2024 at 5:31pm:
My mind has always been open - it is you lot who restrict discussion to what you see as 'black and white' issues and who run around doing most of the name-calling - I give it back to you, turkeys...

If some of you would just stick to the issues instead of 'megaphoning' everyone with your hate speech, more information could be discussed and exchanged... but as long as you want to play trench warfare - I'm your man.


Well you know I don't see things as 'black and white' issues, I see them as "it's the (macro) economy, stupid"... and apart from the hopelessly blind Conservative ideologue lee ('poverty is always with us') , no-one else is currently commenting on the age of criminal responsibility issue - itself an irrelevant diversion from examining causes of youth crime.

Of course violent offenders should be locked up regardless of age. What the state does with them after they are locked up is another issue. And how to prevent crime by young offenders in the first place is another.




Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
SadKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


#FightStupid

Posts: 17270
Mianjin (Brisbane)
Re: Lowering the age of crim responsibility
Reply #232 - Nov 8th, 2024 at 11:26am
 
thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 8th, 2024 at 10:56am:
no-one else is currently commenting on the age of criminal responsibility issue - itself an irrelevant diversion from examining causes of youth crime.


This is entirely intentional, it’s the way things operate here by design. A topic is introduced, not for genuine discussion, but as a mere springboard for the usual vitriol.

Recently, we've seen a push to demand that others answer questions and share their views, using those replied, no matter what they are, as the jumping-off point, yet the same pattern unfolds: the familiar culprits launch into their predictable rants, regardless of the actual issue, always driven by the same agenda.

What’s almost amusing is their feeble attempt to conceal this under the veneer of 'genuine discussion.' There’s one individual in particular who can’t manage even a semblance of subtlety and reminds us of this fact with every interaction.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 84664
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: Lowering the age of crim responsibility
Reply #233 - Nov 8th, 2024 at 11:38am
 
Well - stop raving about 'generational disadvantage' and all the other things and how the poor black man is oppressed...

Stick to the issue.

I've offered my view - a view that has never changed despite the endless rhetoric from some of you that clouds every issue and turns it into a free-for-all of two allegedly opposite sides based on your perceptions of race.

NOTE:-  the South Australian AOTY is a woman who specialises in child protection - one of them evil 'stealers' of children, you know.... not some pharken 'entertainer' in some isolated community spot... FFS...  I should've put up for AOTY one of the blokes who does gigs at the clubs and pubs here...
Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 8th, 2024 at 11:55am by Grappler Truth Teller Feller »  

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 84664
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: Lowering the age of crim responsibility
Reply #234 - Nov 8th, 2024 at 12:04pm
 
Point of Interest:-  The moment someone up there (Kazaly) comes up with the idea of lowering the age of criminal responsibility down to 10 or so ................... we'll let that one hang in the air until you catch up ........ ...........  are you there yet? ... ................each and every one of you Fearless Crusaders For Poor Oppressed Aboriginal Rights instantly takes the position that this is against Aboriginal children criminals.

You need to consider why that is clearly the truth - I'll be back later to watch you squirm on this hook ...
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12952
Gender: male
Re: Lowering the age of crim responsibility
Reply #235 - Nov 8th, 2024 at 12:12pm
 
lee wrote on Nov 7th, 2024 at 7:37pm:
Np your wish is to somehow reduce all criminality, until your wishes are met. No age limit because "failed parents". Roll Eyes


Wrong: as explained to graps previously:

Of course violent offenders should be locked up regardless of age. What the state does with them after they are locked up is another issue. And how to prevent crime by young offenders in the first place is another.


I accept your concession.

Quote:
There is no such thing as "genteel poverty". Are homeless people living in "genteel poverty"?


Back to your egghead lawyer act. 

Some homeless are mentally ill, some manage best according to their own abilities by sleeping rough; others who may be renting  "lead lives of quiet desperation" (in genteel poverty).

Quote:
TGD:
"You are living in poverty, your neighborhoods are like war zones, your young men are in prison..."
D. Trump, before the 2016 election.

Oh dear. Now he claims Don knows all.


Try 'Les Miserables' by Victor Hugo? ...poverty, inequality, crime; and justice and transformation.....

Quote:
No it doesn't. You are still responsible for your life choices, no one forces you to do anything.


See above: your blind, Conservative 'poverty is always with us' meme is exposed by keen observers of the human condition (Hugo of course much keener than Trump....).

Note all the 'personal choices' which led to the reign of terror during the French Revolution.....the King was inclined to listen to his chief economic advisor who urged him to raise taxes on the aristocracy, but powerful aristocrats won the argument with the King, driven by their personal greed.   

Ouch, the King might have kept his head if he had listened to his wise economist, rather than the greedy "poverty is always with us' aristocrats.

See how inadequate,  constrained, and primitive your "personal responsibility' mantra is.

Quote:
So SE Asians are not treated as "whartey's"? But they are not white. Wink


whartey is graps neologism for whites, do try to keep up.

Quote:
Not from me. From YOU, who can tell?


Ok, you aren't dementing, just low IQ or fraudulent - whartey has nothing to do with different white races.

Quote:
That's an assumption,
 

Rich people commit white collar crime, not out of necessity or socio-economic mileu, but out of  greed or personal aggrandizement or some other sin/character flaw.  It's an individual crime, in a rich community. 

No assumption, whatever his actual sin is; and the crime doesn't affect his rich  neighbours who don't even know anything about the particular white collar crime (until he is exposed by the ATO or whomever).   

Different to crime in the poverty ghetto, where greed might motivate the top 'head-kicker' extorting money from those around him also living in poverty.   

Quote:
You get greed related crime in ghettos. It is why "gangsta's" thrive. Shocked


Low IQ; you forgot *necessity* and poor role models in a socio economic disadvantage milieu. Kids in rich families have a different set of issues to deal with, not related to economic deprivation. 

To repeat (since it didn't make it past past the gatekeepers of your blind, Conservative ideology:

blind individual greed-related crime in wealthy communities is different to widespread crime in poverty ghettos


Quote:
You really are a half-trick pony. Grin Grin Grin Grin


"It's the economy, stupid"?

Guilty as charged.

Lucky for you, you will never have to face the circumstances of the King, noted above, or life in a poverty ghetto. 
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12952
Gender: male
Re: Lowering the age of crim responsibility
Reply #236 - Nov 8th, 2024 at 12:31pm
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Nov 8th, 2024 at 11:38am:
Well - stop raving about 'generational disadvantage' and all the other things and how the poor black man is oppressed...

Stick to the issue.


Which is?   

Immediately after I wrote:

Of course violent offenders should be locked up regardless of age. What the state does with them after they are locked up is another issue. And how to prevent crime by young offenders in the first place is another.


...which you blithely ignored.

So what is the issue re age of criminal  responsibility?

I have thoroughly debunked your 'personal responsibilty' mantra in my reply to the useful idiot lee, as he exposes his blind Conservative 'poverty is always with us' mantra.

Quote:
I've offered my view - a view that has never changed despite the endless rhetoric from some of you that clouds every issue and turns it into a free-for-all of two allegedly opposite sides based on your perceptions of race.


Race? - not in my case  (though Oz blacks ARE burdened by issues of culture as well as the economy which affects the rest of us); but your 'personal responsibility' ideology is rooted in the same blindness as Lee's 'poverty is always with us' ideology (which is why he's saying some poor people don't commit crime, therefore  nothing to see re poverty and crime).

Quote:
NOTE:-  the South Australian AOTY is a woman who specialises in child protection - one of them evil 'stealers' of children, you know.... not some pharken 'entertainer' in some isolated community spot... FFS...  I should've put up for AOTY one of the blokes who does gigs at the clubs and pubs here...


The need for state-managed child protection is itself evidence of macroeconomic dysfunction hidden  under welfare dependency.   
Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 8th, 2024 at 12:39pm by thegreatdivide »  
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12952
Gender: male
Re: Lowering the age of crim responsibility
Reply #237 - Nov 8th, 2024 at 12:42pm
 
SadKangaroo wrote on Nov 8th, 2024 at 11:26am:
thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 8th, 2024 at 10:56am:
no-one else is currently commenting on the age of criminal responsibility issue - itself an irrelevant diversion from examining causes of youth crime.


This is entirely intentional, it’s the way things operate here by design. A topic is introduced, not for genuine discussion, but as a mere springboard for the usual vitriol.


You have my sympathy...

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 84664
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: Lowering the age of crim responsibility
Reply #238 - Nov 8th, 2024 at 4:36pm
 
Well then - state your position clearly without all the usual runaround about the poor black remains in thrall to all the down-sides of civilisation etc..... stick to the subject without the hyperbole...

As for Kanga - the vitriol never begins with me - I'm just better at it than youse losers - most of my posts are on the subject unless you compel response to your silliness.

What are the odds that the Northern Territory will make a deal with Arnhem Land to become the de facto Park up there (Kazaly), take in all the Aboriginal troublemakers, starting with the kids for whom there is some hope (10% or so), and re-larn them how to go about things proper, according to the Noble Aboriginal Proud Person ways - become persons of such integrity that nobody can call them losers.... and they can stand tall as grown men and women and say nobody can point the bone at them for being criminals or doing criminal things.....

Anyone?  Where else are they going to put all these kids first - then all the adults - other than in The Park or equivalent so that their Elders can set them on the True Paths Of Righteous Behaviour etc, re-educate them and get their minds right about responsible behaviour and ways to get ahead in life?

Some people are doing that already up there (Kazaly),  sort of an aquascoot thing with young fullahs and such being taught horse skills and cattle skills and such and getting a grip on what it feels like to EARN pride in their skills and abilities.... and BECOME someone in their own eyes and those of others..... you won't get that by continued affirmative action, soft soaping, supporting them in their victimhood mentality, and throwing handfuls of dollars at brick walls...

They're gonna need a bigger aquascoot family .....
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17644
Gender: male
Re: Lowering the age of crim responsibility
Reply #239 - Nov 8th, 2024 at 6:00pm
 
thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 8th, 2024 at 12:12pm:
Of course violent offenders should be locked up regardless of age.



I never said anything about VIOLENT offenders. Roll Eyes You really are confusing issues.

thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 8th, 2024 at 12:12pm:
I accept your concession.

What did I concede? Grin Grin Grin Grin

thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 8th, 2024 at 12:12pm:
Some homeless are mentally ill, some manage best according to their own abilities by sleeping rough; others who may be renting  "lead lives of quiet desperation" (in genteel poverty).


And others might be living quite well. Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Another explanation that only does to your pre-conceived notions. "may be renting etc. Wink

thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 8th, 2024 at 12:12pm:
Try 'Les Miserables' by Victor Hugo? .


Why is he "livin' the dream"? Grin Grin Grin Grin Pre=conceptions again. Wink

thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 8th, 2024 at 12:12pm:
See above: your blind, Conservative 'poverty is always with us' meme is exposed by keen observers of the human condition (Hugo of course much keener than Trump....).


So now it is Hugo who knows all. Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 8th, 2024 at 12:12pm:
Ouch, the King might have kept his head if he had listened to his wise economist, rather than the greedy "poverty is always with us' aristocrats.


"may have kept his head". You keep making claims that are not worth anything. Grin Grin Grin

thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 8th, 2024 at 12:12pm:
See how inadequate,  constrained, and primitive your "personal responsibility' mantra is.


Nope just your pre-conceived notions will fix everything. Grin Grin Grin Grin

thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 8th, 2024 at 12:12pm:
whartey is graps neologism for whites, do try to keep up.


And it has never been mine. Do try to keep up. Answer my pieces not Graps. He is a big boy and can handle himself. Wink


thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 8th, 2024 at 12:12pm:
Ok, you aren't dementing, just low IQ or fraudulent - whartey has nothing to do with different white races.


Have you got a link to that? So Melanesian's generally attacking Chinese is different? And I use Melanesian's widely like the Torres Strait Islander/ Cape York type. More Melanesian than Aboriginal.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 ... 36
Send Topic Print