thegreatdivide wrote on Dec 6^th, 2024 at 10:58am:


So now you don't know.

thegreatdivide wrote on Dec 6^th, 2024 at 10:58am:


And yet it is never cited. So how do YOU know that they KNOW. You know pre-industrial takes in the LIA. A time of starvation anf famine. And you want to go back to those times.

BTW - the ice cores show that CO2 rises before temperature rises. So your KNOWLEDGE is seriously deficient.

thegreatdivide wrote on Dec 6^th, 2024 at 10:58am:


Really? Water boils at 100C, salt water slightly higher. The reported ocean temperature in ONE part of the USA got to around 100F (something less than 38C). And you reckon scientists backed that? They must be numerically deficient, IF they did, something I don't recall happening. But I am sure you will read between the lines somewhere.

thegreatdivide wrote on Dec 6^th, 2024 at 10:58am:


So what you really want is to take the world back from 150 years of growth.

thegreatdivide wrote on Dec 6^th, 2024 at 10:58am:


So he only got it part right, part wrong and only YOU know the difference.

thegreatdivide wrote on Dec 6^th, 2024 at 10:58am:



Nope. So you quoted something trhat wasn't even attributable to me. That is so YOU. thegreatdivide wrote on Dec 6^th, 2024 at 10:58am:


Poor tgd, believes he refutes things, whereas he merely disagrees. Refutation requires proof.

thegreatdivide wrote on Dec 6^th, 2024 at 10:58am:


And yet you are the one that keeps trying to prove me wrong, and fails.

And you expect the Government to fund your lifestyle? Wow. 

But I see you left out what the IPCC has concluded.

Jasin wrote on Dec 5^th, 2024 at 6:55pm:


What of it?

Banana Republics don't have green energy - they try to have supplies of old wood to burn for cooking and heating etc... burns better with less smoke....

MY statement - macroeconomic and microeconomics desperately needs overhaul, along with all the social issues that create the current environment of New Robber Barons, which includes our political class, imposing Economic Feudalism on the majority... just not your way.

I have the answers - not you ...... all you have is dogma or lack of knowledge and understanding....

First we'll resolve the underlying issues for this country - install a Two State Solution and fully review and revamp immigration, install deportation or exile of malefactor .... divorce from the 'global economy' and its stable mate 'internationalism' or 'equalising all worldwide in equal poverty for the majority but not those who install it' (nothing new there) ... drain the billabongs first - then count the remaining crocodiles ... regain control of our own Homeland and then create a better world for those deemed worthy of remaining here.... tax people who ship funds to tax havens for every cent they bring in or take out.... impose new rules for business Offshore to operate here with minimum tax payable (sort the sheep from the goats ... the vultures from the eagles we have hooded on the hand) ...

It's a big ask .. requiring a big man.....    .. a man of vision and of dedication to right first and foremost ...

You bring the slippery slope to determining eligibility and I'll bring the grease ...

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Dec 7^th, 2024 at 12:17pm:


Your error: they don't try to do that,  they are FORCED to do it because of poor economic conditions/development.

Quote:


So we are arguing over the TYPE of new macro-economics required?

Quote:


I admire your boundless self-confidence,  it's up there with Trump's..... 

Quote:


Won't work, too many blacks (and whites claiming to be black) are already fully integrated into Oz's modern white economy, they won't accept their black brethren being separated into an apartheid-style 2 state solution.

Quote:


There's your blind Conservative lie again - deliberately, or ignorantly equating eradication of poverty with equality of outcome. Deplorable.

Proving that - despite your self-confidence  -  you remain uneducable.


Quote:


Ill pass on the rambling narrative; examining macroeconomic systems requires precise understanding of the nature of money, and the difference between maco and micro economics. 

Quote:


Indeed.

Quote:


Your error: we all have the right AND  responsibility  to participate in the economy; and it's the government's responsibility to ensure that outcome is achieved with no-one living in systemic/generational  poverty.

No "slippery slope" involved.

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Dec 7^th, 2024 at 4:33pm:


See the result of lee leading you astray, you better stick to the thread topic. ....(note: "positive minded neo serfs", like the rest of us, will need to transition to green technologies, with World Bank assistance if required).   

Quote:


Answer: the current false neoclassical economic orthodoxy which forces the people who are least able to compete in the job market into welfare dependency.

Hope that helps.  ...(looking for the appropriate emoji....)

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Dec 7^th, 2024 at 6:07pm:


Apart from the fact  the highlighted is one of your  typically  incomprehensible pieces of nonsense - even if it's intended to push lee's 'climate hoax'theories, the wide-spread  attempt - and disputation - to determine the age of criminal responsibiliy is merely a diversion to avoid examining the causes of youth crime.

Deplorable.

Quote:
 

Really?  Let's read on...

Quote:


The high-lighted: your error. 

Being poor and disadvataged is assocaited with higher crime rates.

google

   Poverty and socioeconomic factors are linked to crime in Australia, as shown by the following statistics:

Poverty rates

In 2019-2020, 13% of Australians, including almost 800,000 children, lived below the poverty line. The average income for households living in poverty is less than half of the poverty line.

Juvenile crime

Poverty, single-parent families, and crowded dwellings can increase the rate of child neglect, which is a major factor in juvenile crime.

Do try to keep up....

lee wrote on Dec 8^th, 2024 at 1:21pm:


The "non sequitur" is actually the illogicallity in graps nonsense narrative, which  you are attempting to support by blaming his nonsense  on me, in a laughable Laurel and Hardy passing  the baton routine.

Now...back to the topic, dummy; you will see it at the top of the page....