Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 23
rd, 2024 at 10:12am:
SadKangaroo wrote on Oct 23
rd, 2024 at 9:40am:
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 21
st, 2024 at 5:06pm:
Still not listening, eh? You must not only listen but hear - and you have not passed step one.
You ad your kind are totally one-sided - like uninformed children - those you desperately seek to ally me with and equate mmy views with are the same..... I stand for ALL the people not just some....
You mistake the generous offer of the DEMANDED homeland blah blah blah.
You don't get to pretend you meant something else when you were talking about killing them.
All I said was the Poms didn't do much of a job and perhaps could do better next time around.....
No, you said it would have been less trouble if they'd gotten rid of them all, while of course using a racial slur:
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 9
th, 2019 at 11:08pm:
Be a lot less trouble today if they'd gotten rid of all the Boongs... the Poms need to go back and re-plan their Invasion to get it right...
There is no weaselling out of that. Your intentions are clear.
Quote:the only reference was to the authorities having to declare a state of riot and in extremis open fire on rioting crowds that would not disperse. You're slow, aren't you?
You wanted to shoot Indigenous people on-site if they were on Uluru, and you know, 10% of Boris' targets for the Army shooting them on sight might be worth saving. Both of those comments you offered without prompting, decided to enter and agree, or offer an unprompted suggested of shooting them on site yourself.
Again, your intentions are clear.
Quote:You and your kind simply do not want to confront the realities of the demands.... demanding instant access to vast freeholdings without payment, something nobody else can do, is not Apartheid to you... different rules in courts are not Apartheid to you... and so on and so on and so on.... it's not even Segregation - separate but equal - it's a demand for separate but unequal.
You’ve consistently redefined the concept of Apartheid to fit your narrative, warping its meaning beyond recognition.
It's a constant theme with you, you ignore what others say, literally editing their quotes to remove what you cannot deal with, then redefine terms you want to use, to suit your argument.
And you want to attack others for not wanting to confront reality.
Please.
You’ve made it abundantly clear that you harbour no goodwill towards Indigenous Australians.
Don’t pretend to cloak yourself in the guise of “doing what they want” or to feign concern for Indigenous communities, especially for the women and children.
You actively oppose funding that would help women escape violence in those very communities. You’ve suggested that the punishment for children swimming in the wrong places should involve a cable tie around their necks, yet you expect anyone to take seriously your hollow pleas about helping these women and children?
Out of the 81 women killed due to domestic violence, 93% were Indigenous, and still, you manipulate this tragic reality to serve your argument.
You’ve weaponised these statistics as a shield, all while refusing—despite being asked repeatedly—to offer a single constructive solution. You demand answers from others, yet remain conspicuously silent when it comes to outlining what you would do to genuinely help.
Your intent is clear: it was never about helping Indigenous Australians. You exploit these statistics purely to fuel your attacks on them, and no one is buying into your thinly veiled deceit.
Your inability to engage in honest discourse is evident, as is your habitual evasion of reality while accusing others of precisely that.
Engaging with you is utterly futile.
And to top it off, you continuously peddle blatant falsehoods that demand correction, lest this space devolve into a self-sustaining echo chamber where you argue only with your own delusions.
Forum
Pages: 
