Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 ... 7
Send Topic Print
Should King Charles say, "Sorry"? (Read 2033 times)
tallowood
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6048
Re: Should King Charles say, "Sorry"?
Reply #30 - Oct 20th, 2024 at 5:18pm
 
...
Back to top
 

ישראל חיה ערבים לערבים
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 46343
Gender: male
Re: Should King Charles say, "Sorry"?
Reply #31 - Oct 20th, 2024 at 5:30pm
 
SadKangaroo wrote on Oct 19th, 2024 at 11:31am:
No.

The apology has already been made, we should be working away from that towards truth telling and reconciliation.



What truth has not been told yet?

What will reconciliation actually look like? What does it mean in practice?
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
SadKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


#FightStupid

Posts: 17271
Mianjin (Brisbane)
Re: Should King Charles say, "Sorry"?
Reply #32 - Oct 21st, 2024 at 7:41am
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 20th, 2024 at 10:14am:
SadKangaroo wrote on Oct 20th, 2024 at 7:51am:
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 19th, 2024 at 4:42pm:
All right - let's remove the rubbish from your response:-

SadKangaroo wrote on Oct 19th, 2024 at 4:18pm:
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 19th, 2024 at 12:45pm:
Now that we've got you settled in your bullshit again, skanka - what EXACTLY are your plans for 'reconciliation'?

Cheap and empty words just won't cut it.... so get on with it....



Now then - how do YOU propose we all go about 'reconciliation'?  Start by giving us your **chuckles** 'definition' of 'reconciliation'.




Just took away all your personal slagging and animosity - left nothing in your post... sorry 'bout that.

Tell us all what your 'definition' of reconciliation is, what you consider that reconciliation entails, and how YOU would go about it.

I'm just trying to get a reasonable answer to reasonable questions about the push for Apartheid here... hold a reasonable discussion.. set some decent ground rules by leading by behaviour/actions here..... I doubt I could be fairer than that....   Cool


Why is it that I'm always answering your questions and you're always weaselling out of mine, even when they're so benign as to simply be asking you for your opinion on the very news article you posted?

Fool me once.

And we've been over reconciliation before, but you just ignored it.  So now I have to repeat myself?

How many times am I going to have to repeat?

And you won't come to the table and answer my questions, and even edit them out of your quotes entirely?

Discussion requires give and take, not demanding things you're only going to ignore, while only looking for a gotcha that will never come.

I don't think it's unreasonable to post these questions to you,

SadKangaroo wrote on Oct 20th, 2024 at 7:51am:
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 19th, 2024 at 4:42pm:
Now then - how do YOU propose we all go about 'reconcilation'?  Start by giving us your **chuckles** 'definition' of 'reconciliation'.


Alright, I’ll give you one last chance at a genuine discussion, but let’s set some ground rules first.

Do you actually want the real answer, the well-considered, informed one that might take a bit longer to unpack? Or are you just fishing for a quick one-liner you can conveniently ignore or twist, like you've been doing lately?

And since this is meant to be a discussion, what are you bringing to the table? Will you finally explain why you’re so against moving forward on reconciliation? Or why you seem hell-bent on opposing every single policy or announcement that could benefit Indigenous people?

Is that too much to ask for in return?


What are you so afraid of?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 84664
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: Should King Charles say, "Sorry"?
Reply #33 - Oct 21st, 2024 at 11:30am
 
You haven't yet answered the question I asked...

What is YOUR definition of 'reconcilation'?

Once we get that squeezed out of you, we can go on to the rest of the quest.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 21st, 2024 at 11:37am by Grappler Truth Teller Feller »  

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
SadKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


#FightStupid

Posts: 17271
Mianjin (Brisbane)
Re: Should King Charles say, "Sorry"?
Reply #34 - Oct 21st, 2024 at 12:18pm
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 21st, 2024 at 11:30am:
You haven't yet answered the question I asked...

What is YOUR definition of 'reconcilation'?

Once we get that squeezed out of you, we can go on to the rest of the quest.


Firstly, we'll see if you can be trusted, I highly doubt it but here we go anyway.  I'm borrowing greatly from my last post where I went through my thoughts on the topic in detail, only to have it ignored or cherry-picked at the time.

I'm also making the assumption that you are in fact looking for more than a one liner, and a genuine response to the question.  Again, I remain sceptical, but we'll see what happens.

I am no expert in the area, but I do know our history, what was done to the Indigenous population during colonisation and since, and while I've only lived in the NT for about 8 months when I was driving tour buses as a way to gain experience to move into the Mining Industry, a past life then never panned out, it was an eye opening experience.

I am not a scholar on this subject and have limited personal experience.  This is why I have let my opinions be guided by those who are, and have more experience than me.

They have suggested that the goal of reconciliation is to address the historical injustices, ongoing disparities, and cultural insensitivities faced by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples since colonisation, this statement is one that resonates with me.

The best way to achieve this they suggest, is through the following framework, especially since The Voice failed:

Historical Acknowledgment and Truth-Telling

Official Apologies and Acknowledgments: Sincere, nationwide acknowledgments of past wrongdoings, including the Stolen Generations, forced labor, land theft, and cultural suppression.

Truth and Reconciliation Commission: Establishing a commission to document and publicly disclose the full extent of historical injustices, providing a platform for survivors to share their stories.

Cultural Recognition and Preservation

Constitutional Recognition: Incorporating Indigenous Australians into the Constitution, acknowledging their prior ownership and ongoing connection to the land.

Preservation of Languages and Cultures: Government-supported programs to revive, teach, and promote Indigenous languages and cultural practices.

Indigenous Representation in Media and Education: Inclusive representation in media, and integration of Indigenous histories and perspectives into the national curriculum.

Land Rights and Self-Determination

Expanded Land Rights and Native Title: Strengthening and expanding land rights to ensure greater control over traditional lands, including the right to manage and protect sacred sites.

Self-Governance and Decision-Making Power: Empowering Indigenous communities with autonomy to make decisions over their lands, services, and futures.

Health and Wellbeing Parity

Targeted Healthcare Initiatives: Programs addressing the significant gaps in health outcomes, including higher rates of chronic disease, lower life expectancy, and poor mental health.

Access to Clean Water, Housing, and Sanitation: Ensuring basic human rights are met in all Indigenous communities.

Economic Empowerment

Employment and Education Initiatives: Tailored programs to increase Indigenous employment rates, educational attainment, and economic participation.

Support for Indigenous-Owned Businesses: Financial and regulatory support to foster entrepreneurship and economic self-sufficiency.

Justice and Incarceration Reform

Reducing Incarceration Rates: Implementing alternative justice models and rehabilitation programs to address the disproportionate representation of Indigenous Australians in the prison system.

Royal Commission into Indigenous Incarceration: Investigating the root causes and recommending systemic reforms.

Community-Led Reconciliation Initiatives

Grassroots Reconciliation Programs: Funding and supporting community-driven projects that foster cross-cultural understanding and reconciliation.

Indigenous-Led Solutions: Prioritising Indigenous voices and leadership in the development and implementation of reconciliation strategies.

On paper, this all sounds great, but it will not work without the leaders in their communities driving the charge and, through more options for self-determination, also expecting more of their community members.

Without this, none of the above will make a difference.  They need to be included in the process and want to put in the work to achieve the outcome.

There will also, sadly, need to be extra bureaucratic measures in place to monitor, report and administer the vast amounts of funds that will need to be injected into making this a reality, costing even more than will directly benefit the people, but every dollar will need to be accounted for, and that isn't free.

It is a shame that the Voice was rejected by the people, but Labor and those who support the Uluru Statement, especially those like Labor who took it to the last election, should continue working towards that end.

Grap, if you'd be so kind as to answer my questions in return, it would be appreciated.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 84664
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: Should King Charles say, "Sorry"?
Reply #35 - Oct 21st, 2024 at 1:26pm
 
SadKangaroo wrote on Oct 21st, 2024 at 12:18pm:
[quote author=The_Grappler link=1729150885/33#33 date=1729474254]You haven't yet answered the question I asked...

What is YOUR definition of 'reconcilation'?

Once we get that squeezed out of you, we can go on to the rest of the quest.




I am no expert in the area, but I do know our history, what was done to the Indigenous population during colonisation and since,
You know parts of it, like everyone else. In this day and age you only hear one side of it.


I am not a scholar on this subject and have limited personal experience.  This is why I have let my opinions be guided by those who are, and have more experience than me. 
Who again, in many cases, are victims of academic rigor mortis bias, have vested interests and biased views of history, non-inclusive in any way but one-sided.


They have suggested that the goal of reconciliation is to address the historical injustices, ongoing disparities, and cultural insensitivities faced by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples since colonisation, this statement is one that resonates with me.
Injustices etc all work many ways - not one.  The root causes of disparities are numerous - and primarily the result of lifestyle - heal thyself!  'cultural insensitivies works all ways and must take second place to realities.


The best way to achieve this they suggest, is through the following framework, especially since The Voice failed:

Historical Acknowledgment and Truth-Telling

Official Apologies and Acknowledgments: Sincere, nationwide acknowledgments of past wrongdoings, including the Stolen Generations, forced labor, land theft, and cultural suppression. 
All been done time and again.


Truth and Reconciliation Commission: Establishing a commission to document and publicly disclose the full extent of historical injustices, providing a platform for survivors to share their stories. 
A one-sided 'commission is of no value.


Cultural Recognition and Preservation

Constitutional Recognition: Incorporating Indigenous Australians into the Constitution, acknowledging their prior ownership and ongoing connection to the land. 
They are already citizens, their prior different style of 'ownership' has been recognised and so has their 'ongoing connection with the land



Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 21st, 2024 at 1:32pm by Grappler Truth Teller Feller »  

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 84664
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: Should King Charles say, "Sorry"?
Reply #36 - Oct 21st, 2024 at 1:34pm
 
Now do yourself a favour - post your concepts one at a time - once the page runs out I just stop bothering responding to your endless monologue.

You are fundamentally wrong about all of the things you've mentioned, in many, many ways.

In short - again - Aborigine - Heal Thyself!  Get out of the past, stop clinging to a lost delusion of an idyll in the warm sun, and get on with life.

Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
SadKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


#FightStupid

Posts: 17271
Mianjin (Brisbane)
Re: Should King Charles say, "Sorry"?
Reply #37 - Oct 21st, 2024 at 1:41pm
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 21st, 2024 at 1:34pm:
Now do yourself a favour - post your concepts one at a time - once the page runs out I just stop bothering responding to your endless monologue.

You are fundamentally wrong about all of the things you've mentioned, in many, many ways.

In short - again - Aborigine - Heal Thyself!  Get out of the past, stop clinging to a lost delusion of an idyll in the warm sun, and get on with life.



Now now, I answered your question, please answer mine,

SadKangaroo wrote on Oct 20th, 2024 at 7:51am:
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 19th, 2024 at 4:42pm:
Now then - how do YOU propose we all go about 'reconcilation'?  Start by giving us your **chuckles** 'definition' of 'reconciliation'.


Alright, I’ll give you one last chance at a genuine discussion, but let’s set some ground rules first.

Do you actually want the real answer, the well-considered, informed one that might take a bit longer to unpack? Or are you just fishing for a quick one-liner you can conveniently ignore or twist, like you've been doing lately?

And since this is meant to be a discussion, what are you bringing to the table? Will you finally explain why you’re so against moving forward on reconciliation? Or why you seem hell-bent on opposing every single policy or announcement that could benefit Indigenous people?

Is that too much to ask for in return?


Thanks.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
SadKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


#FightStupid

Posts: 17271
Mianjin (Brisbane)
Re: Should King Charles say, "Sorry"?
Reply #38 - Oct 21st, 2024 at 1:47pm
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 21st, 2024 at 1:34pm:
Now do yourself a favour - post your concepts one at a time - once the page runs out I just stop bothering responding to your endless monologue.

You are fundamentally wrong about all of the things you've mentioned, in many, many ways.

In short - again - Aborigine - Heal Thyself!  Get out of the past, stop clinging to a lost delusion of an idyll in the warm sun, and get on with life.



Instead of piling on more demands, if you think I’m wrong, have the courage to articulate why, and let’s debate like adults.

If you’ve got better alternatives, don’t just hint at them, lay them out.

Or is this whole facade just your way of sulking because you didn’t get what you wanted from my post? If you’re done playing this tiresome game, just say so.

But if you’ve got any intellectual stamina left, I’m more than willing to continue.

I’m actually interested in your insights on the issue. So far, all you’ve offered are thinly veiled, bigoted dismissals. Surely, you can do better than that, or is this the full extent of your reasoning?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
MeisterEckhart
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 12505
Gender: male
Re: Should King Charles say, "Sorry"?
Reply #39 - Oct 21st, 2024 at 2:36pm
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 21st, 2024 at 11:30am:
What is YOUR definition of 'reconcilation'?

Isn't it for the aggrieved to determine the definition of, and what constitutes reconciliation?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 84664
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: Should King Charles say, "Sorry"?
Reply #40 - Oct 21st, 2024 at 3:03pm
 
MeisterEckhart wrote on Oct 21st, 2024 at 2:36pm:
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 21st, 2024 at 11:30am:
What is YOUR definition of 'reconcilation'?

Isn't it for the aggrieved to determine the definition of, and what constitutes reconciliation?


No.  It is for an independent, balanced, and neutral body to determine the facts as far as possible ... simple grievance holding is not the answer.

Look at the narrative of 'massacres' 'driven off the land' etc.... in the very vast majority of cases, any 'massacres' were in response to murders and stock killings and such ... if they were in fact 'driven off the land' why are they still there?  Answer:- those who lived in peace remained... those who chose not to received the same in return.

How come so much of some of the primest land in Sydney - South Maroubra and down to the foreshores - is Aboriginal land from which many great people - the Ella brothers etc - have come?  Were they 'driven off'?

Nah - nah - they was all massacred and then driven off ..... true story....

There's a point at which fireside embellishments have to be called out... the 'Appin Massacre' 1816 - killed 14 men in arms ... those 14 men had murdered 16 Whites including unarmed men and unarmed and defenceless women and children.... their women and children were not killed.... yet their descendants still cry about their ancestor being taken under protection in a fight to the death, and removed to a place of safety - from which they remained in the gene pool to even produce their descendants who cry about it today, over two hundred falcon years later!

If I went back to 1816 I'd have grievance against the Danish, Scottish, Irish, English and German governments.... FFS.

Got that?  What 'reconciliation' is owed to that crying descendant who lives comfortably in a house and is interviewed over a cup of tea with biscuits in a peaceful home environment?  What 'reconciliation' is owed to the likes of Ray Martin and Stan Grant (both of whom I never noticed to be Aboriginal until they 'came out' - simply didn't matter to me - yet some of you scum yell 'racist' at me while drowning in your Deep Real Racism against Australia that nurtures you) and any number of others who have done very well, thank you, out of our society and culture?

Why would reconciliation be owed to some asshole who steals his/her tribe's royalty money (etc) and uses it for self, mates and family?  Best you turn him/her over to village justice!!

You lost souls...........   Cheesy   Shocked                               Cool
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 21st, 2024 at 3:23pm by Grappler Truth Teller Feller »  

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
SadKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


#FightStupid

Posts: 17271
Mianjin (Brisbane)
Re: Should King Charles say, "Sorry"?
Reply #41 - Oct 21st, 2024 at 3:06pm
 
MeisterEckhart wrote on Oct 21st, 2024 at 2:36pm:
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 21st, 2024 at 11:30am:
What is YOUR definition of 'reconcilation'?

Isn't it for the aggrieved to determine the definition of, and what constitutes reconciliation?


Yes, but there are no gotchas in that.

That's why I support the upper-level notion of,

SadKangaroo wrote on Oct 21st, 2024 at 12:18pm:
the goal of reconciliation is to address the historical injustices, ongoing disparities, and cultural insensitivities faced by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples since colonisation


While it is not my place to make the final judgment, I am content to defer to those with greater expertise, whether in design, implementation, or the respected Leaders, Elders, and Members of the Indigenous communities.

As for Grap's question, I believe I have responded to the best of my ability, expressing my views and my interpretation of his so-called "YOUR" demands.

It will be intriguing to see whether he chooses to engage in kind, or if his previous patterns of behaviour will merely continue to define him.

No abuse intended.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
SadKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


#FightStupid

Posts: 17271
Mianjin (Brisbane)
Re: Should King Charles say, "Sorry"?
Reply #42 - Oct 21st, 2024 at 3:06pm
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 21st, 2024 at 3:03pm:
MeisterEckhart wrote on Oct 21st, 2024 at 2:36pm:
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 21st, 2024 at 11:30am:
What is YOUR definition of 'reconcilation'?

Isn't it for the aggrieved to determine the definition of, and what constitutes reconciliation?


No.


Why do you think that?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
MeisterEckhart
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 12505
Gender: male
Re: Should King Charles say, "Sorry"?
Reply #43 - Oct 21st, 2024 at 3:22pm
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 21st, 2024 at 3:03pm:
MeisterEckhart wrote on Oct 21st, 2024 at 2:36pm:
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 21st, 2024 at 11:30am:
What is YOUR definition of 'reconcilation'?

Isn't it for the aggrieved to determine the definition of, and what constitutes reconciliation?


No.

If you believe I have committed a wrong against you, are you saying it is for me to determine (a) that I have done so and (b) the terms of reconciliation?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 84664
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: Should King Charles say, "Sorry"?
Reply #44 - Oct 21st, 2024 at 3:25pm
 
SadKangaroo wrote on Oct 21st, 2024 at 1:47pm:
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 21st, 2024 at 1:34pm:
Now do yourself a favour - post your concepts one at a time - once the page runs out I just stop bothering responding to your endless monologue.

You are fundamentally wrong about all of the things you've mentioned, in many, many ways.

In short - again - Aborigine - Heal Thyself!  Get out of the past, stop clinging to a lost delusion of an idyll in the warm sun, and get on with life.



Instead of piling on more demands, if you think I’m wrong, have the courage to articulate why, and let’s debate like adults.

If you’ve got better alternatives, don’t just hint at them, lay them out.



I’m actually interested in your insights on the issue.


.. except you never even respond to a single one of those.....

Now then - how's your homework going?  You know - don't crowd your page with too many issues to answer at one time and then whine that others won't respond to you.

Start again - which one of your copy and pastes do you wish to be responded to first?  One at a time..

Footnote - in the Indian heron user's community - they call it poppy and caste...

Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 ... 7
Send Topic Print