Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print
The Podcast Election (Read 635 times)
MeisterEckhart
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11736
Gender: male
Re: The Podcast Election
Reply #15 - Yesterday at 10:59pm
 
Truth reveals itself in hindsight.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 44400
Gender: male
Re: The Podcast Election
Reply #16 - Yesterday at 11:03pm
 
MeisterEckhart wrote Yesterday at 10:59pm:
Truth reveals itself in hindsight.

Not to you, TDS kids.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
MeisterEckhart
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11736
Gender: male
Re: The Podcast Election
Reply #17 - Yesterday at 11:12pm
 
Trump-Derangement-Syndrome derangement syndrome - the gayer and bitchier, the worse the symptoms.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 44400
Gender: male
Re: The Podcast Election
Reply #18 - Yesterday at 11:37pm
 
MeisterEckhart wrote Yesterday at 11:12pm:
Trump-Derangement-Syndrome derangement syndrome - the gayer and bitchier, the worse the symptoms.


Where are you on the diagnostic spectrum?  You are a pseudo-sophisticate, so I am tipping somewhere between anxiety and confusion.

Only sons of the soil and toil, like Sprinty and Sad, are still at denial.

...

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
MeisterEckhart
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11736
Gender: male
Re: The Podcast Election
Reply #19 - Yesterday at 11:39pm
 
Yep! The gayer, the bitchier...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 44400
Gender: male
Re: The Podcast Election
Reply #20 - Yesterday at 11:41pm
 
MeisterEckhart wrote Yesterday at 11:39pm:
Yep! The gayer, the bitchier...

I am sensing pleading, bargaining and desperation.
You are regressing.


Nurse!!!

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
MeisterEckhart
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11736
Gender: male
Re: The Podcast Election
Reply #21 - Yesterday at 11:44pm
 
Aquascoot to the front desk, please... Aquascoot.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 44400
Gender: male
Re: The Podcast Election
Reply #22 - Yesterday at 11:48pm
 
MeisterEckhart wrote Yesterday at 11:44pm:
Aquascoot to the front desk, please... Aquascoot.

What?? You can't breathe?

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1720228231/221#221
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
MeisterEckhart
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11736
Gender: male
Re: The Podcast Election
Reply #23 - Yesterday at 11:58pm
 
MeisterEckhart wrote Yesterday at 11:44pm:
Aquascoot to the front desk, please... Aquascoot.

Just jab him with a shovel handle and tell him it's your cock.


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
SadKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


#FightStupid

Posts: 16878
Mianjin (Brisbane)
Re: The Podcast Election
Reply #24 - Today at 12:10pm
 
Baronvonrort wrote Yesterday at 4:54pm:
aquascoot wrote Yesterday at 4:45pm:
Was this the podcast election?

The calculations were that if Harris or Trump went on 30 minutes of prime time CNN NBC or ABC every night for 2 months they would not have reached as many people as going once on Rogan

Add in the 100s of millions of views on people like Peterson. Shapiro williamson
Billieau.carlson and triggernometry.


Barron told Donald to do these podcasts to reach the younger audience.

Kamala refused to go on Rogan she only appeared on democrat friendly programs that wouldn't ask hard questions.


It’s telling that you criticise candidates for dodging tough questions but conveniently overlook Trump’s cancelled interviews, skipped debates, and exclusive appearances on friendly podcasts. But impartiality and a shred of self-awareness seem too much to expect from you, don’t they, Barron?

Your hypocrisy couldn’t be more transparent.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
aquascoot
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 34280
Gender: male
Re: The Podcast Election
Reply #25 - Today at 1:25pm
 
SadKangaroo wrote Today at 12:10pm:
Baronvonrort wrote Yesterday at 4:54pm:
aquascoot wrote Yesterday at 4:45pm:
Was this the podcast election?

The calculations were that if Harris or Trump went on 30 minutes of prime time CNN NBC or ABC every night for 2 months they would not have reached as many people as going once on Rogan

Add in the 100s of millions of views on people like Peterson. Shapiro williamson
Billieau.carlson and triggernometry.


Barron told Donald to do these podcasts to reach the younger audience.

Kamala refused to go on Rogan she only appeared on democrat friendly programs that wouldn't ask hard questions.


It’s telling that you criticise candidates for dodging tough questions but conveniently overlook Trump’s cancelled interviews, skipped debates, and exclusive appearances on friendly podcasts. But impartiality and a shred of self-awareness seem too much to expect from you, don’t they, Barron?

Your hypocrisy couldn’t be more transparent.



probably incorrect

rogan endorsed sanders 8 yrs ago

and rogan would have let kamala steer the conversation where ever she wanted

and rogan was very keen to get her

it was a major mistake not to go on

if she had just appeared gracious and sensible (which a DA would surely be able to do), she would have won a lot of votes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
SadKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


#FightStupid

Posts: 16878
Mianjin (Brisbane)
Re: The Podcast Election
Reply #26 - Today at 1:46pm
 
aquascoot wrote Today at 1:25pm:
SadKangaroo wrote Today at 12:10pm:
Baronvonrort wrote Yesterday at 4:54pm:
aquascoot wrote Yesterday at 4:45pm:
Was this the podcast election?

The calculations were that if Harris or Trump went on 30 minutes of prime time CNN NBC or ABC every night for 2 months they would not have reached as many people as going once on Rogan

Add in the 100s of millions of views on people like Peterson. Shapiro williamson
Billieau.carlson and triggernometry.


Barron told Donald to do these podcasts to reach the younger audience.

Kamala refused to go on Rogan she only appeared on democrat friendly programs that wouldn't ask hard questions.


It’s telling that you criticise candidates for dodging tough questions but conveniently overlook Trump’s cancelled interviews, skipped debates, and exclusive appearances on friendly podcasts. But impartiality and a shred of self-awareness seem too much to expect from you, don’t they, Barron?

Your hypocrisy couldn’t be more transparent.



probably incorrect

rogan endorsed sanders 8 yrs ago


Despite being an apparently bleeding heart lefty, I actually listen to the JRE regularly.  There was no question that he was going to support and endorse Trump.

Sanders was able to go on the Podcast all those years ago and actually explain things to Rogan for him to understand, and he did the right thing and supported Burnie.

But he's been indoctrinated into the fringe issues like drag queens, covid and trans rights, he was only every going to back Trump this time around.

Quote:
and rogan would have let kamala steer the conversation where ever she wanted

and rogan was very keen to get her

it was a major mistake not to go on

if she had just appeared gracious and sensible (which a DA would surely be able to do), she would have won a lot of votes


It was certainly a mistake not to go on these shows.  Theo's podcast would have been good, he's an admitted dumb dumb and while hilarious, he just seems to want to know more about things and beyond the shell, he's actually a genuine guy, despite his success.

It was undoubtedly a misstep not to appear on these shows. Theo’s podcast, for instance, would have been an excellent choice. Though he self-deprecatingly calls himself a “dumb-dumb,” he possesses a genuine curiosity that cuts through his comedic persona. Beneath the humour, he’s a sincere guy, willing to engage meaningfully despite his success.

Rogan used to be the same, but less so in recent times.

Harris and her campaign made numerous mistakes, no single miscalculation cost them the race against Trump. Now, we’re left to hope he’ll seriously engage with the responsibilities of the role and, as he claimed, oppose Project 2025.

However, it’s hard not to suspect that he’ll be more absorbed by the allure of playing king. Policy decisions, anything devoid of a ceremonial signing or photo op, may fail to hold his attention long enough to divert him from his golf course or rally stages.

If he delegates, let’s hope those entrusted will hold to his word. Yet with RFK Jr.’s health agenda already aligning closely with Project 2025, the early indicators are troubling.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
aquascoot
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 34280
Gender: male
Re: The Podcast Election
Reply #27 - Today at 2:17pm
 
he must be exhausted

what he might do is put JFK and musk and dana white  in charge and just go play golf

they are smart guys

i see he has appointed suan willies , she is a smart cookie

trump has done his bit

won probably both houses and the white house

now he can hand it off to the movers and shakers
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
aquascoot
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 34280
Gender: male
Re: The Podcast Election
Reply #28 - Today at 2:19pm
 
i would imagine he has done a deal with musk to make bitcoin the NFT of government .

in exchange for musks support

this is called constructing the win/win
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
SadKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


#FightStupid

Posts: 16878
Mianjin (Brisbane)
Re: The Podcast Election
Reply #29 - Today at 2:57pm
 
Musk's wealth increased by 10% on the election result alone.

Smart cookie doesn't mean right for the job, and that's not why they're being selected.

It's more about loyalty than suitability.  They bent the knee.

That's Trump's version of DEI hires.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print