Jasin wrote on Nov 17
th, 2024 at 11:13am:
Yes, but regardless if you are racially connected, or culturally connected to the word Maori. Do they not discriminate against all others in New Zealand when 'the Maori' declare it as their own country, as if to say no others?
Same with the Aborigines and their anti "welcome to your country too'" stance.
That would be the obvious message.
They appear to argue that people of the land (Tangata Whenua) have, by 'birthright', a claim to association with the country while People of the Treaty (Tangata Te Tiriti) have no particular rights or claims given the Treaty did not address settlers'/pioneers' exclusive considerations.
Of course, I'd bet not all Maori agree with this stance.
And then there's the cherry-picking of what it means to be 'Maori', like all fringe ethno-nutjobs do.
Would they surrender their individual rights to a chief including his arbitrarily ordering their death?
Would Maori women consent to complete submission to their husbands and male relatives?
Would they accept that each tribe has the right to arbitrarily wage war, murder and cannibalise other tribes?
Would they consent to one tribe's right to take slaves from another?
The stance of the Maori Party seems to be to argue for the right of 'Maoris' to profit from others while encouraging undereducation, unemployment, alcohol and drug abuse.