Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 ... 17
Send Topic Print
Trump and tariffs (Read 3563 times)
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 137574
Gender: male
Re: Trump and tariffs
Reply #180 - Dec 7th, 2024 at 11:12am
 
Frank wrote on Dec 7th, 2024 at 11:01am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 7th, 2024 at 10:31am:
SadKangaroo wrote on Dec 7th, 2024 at 6:22am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 6th, 2024 at 7:05pm:
I wish someone would sit Frank down and explain how tariffs work.

He's really starting to embarrass himself now.


I considered it, but as with many discussions here, he has already resolved to believe what aligns with his preconceived notions and biases.

Any opinion that diverges from his worldview, no matter how well-supported or logically sound, is summarily dismissed without consideration.

Such perspectives are neither analysed nor critically engaged with; they are simply disregarded.

After all, to entertain dissenting ideas would threaten the fragile narrative in which he, or those who share his outlook, occupy the role of the hero.


Yeah, that sums it up nicely.

He just doesn't want to listen.

Sad.

Silly mongs.

You haven't said why it's wise if Biden does it but a complete disaster if Trumhitler does it. 


Yes, we have - several times.

We've even posted videos that explain it.

Biden's tariffs are strategically targeted.

The rapist's tariffs are a blanket tax.

Biden uses tariffs like a skilled surgeon delicately wielding a scalpel.

The rapist uses them like a demented ape swinging an axe.

Once again: Biden's tariffs are strategically targeted, whereas the rapist's are not.


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 46227
Gender: male
Re: Trump and tariffs
Reply #181 - Dec 7th, 2024 at 11:13am
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 7th, 2024 at 11:12am:
Frank wrote on Dec 7th, 2024 at 11:01am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 7th, 2024 at 10:31am:
SadKangaroo wrote on Dec 7th, 2024 at 6:22am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 6th, 2024 at 7:05pm:
I wish someone would sit Frank down and explain how tariffs work.

He's really starting to embarrass himself now.


I considered it, but as with many discussions here, he has already resolved to believe what aligns with his preconceived notions and biases.

Any opinion that diverges from his worldview, no matter how well-supported or logically sound, is summarily dismissed without consideration.

Such perspectives are neither analysed nor critically engaged with; they are simply disregarded.

After all, to entertain dissenting ideas would threaten the fragile narrative in which he, or those who share his outlook, occupy the role of the hero.


Yeah, that sums it up nicely.

He just doesn't want to listen.

Sad.

Silly mongs.

You haven't said why it's wise if Biden does it but a complete disaster if Trumhitler does it. 


Yes, we have - several times.

We've even posted videos that explain it.

Biden's tariffs are strategically targeted.

The rapist's tariffs are a blanket tax.

Biden uses tariffs like a skilled surgeon delicately wielding a scalpel.

The rapist uses them like a demented ape swinging an axe.

Once again: Biden's tariffs are strategically targeted, whereas the rapist's are not.




Empty b.s..

What aspects of American industry is ok to protect with Biden tariffs and which ones must not be with Trumhitler tarrifs?
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 41839
Re: Trump and tariffs
Reply #182 - Dec 7th, 2024 at 11:15am
 
...
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 137574
Gender: male
Re: Trump and tariffs
Reply #183 - Dec 7th, 2024 at 11:31am
 
Frank wrote on Dec 7th, 2024 at 11:13am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 7th, 2024 at 11:12am:
Frank wrote on Dec 7th, 2024 at 11:01am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 7th, 2024 at 10:31am:
SadKangaroo wrote on Dec 7th, 2024 at 6:22am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 6th, 2024 at 7:05pm:
I wish someone would sit Frank down and explain how tariffs work.

He's really starting to embarrass himself now.


I considered it, but as with many discussions here, he has already resolved to believe what aligns with his preconceived notions and biases.

Any opinion that diverges from his worldview, no matter how well-supported or logically sound, is summarily dismissed without consideration.

Such perspectives are neither analysed nor critically engaged with; they are simply disregarded.

After all, to entertain dissenting ideas would threaten the fragile narrative in which he, or those who share his outlook, occupy the role of the hero.


Yeah, that sums it up nicely.

He just doesn't want to listen.

Sad.

Silly mongs.

You haven't said why it's wise if Biden does it but a complete disaster if Trumhitler does it. 


Yes, we have - several times.

We've even posted videos that explain it.

Biden's tariffs are strategically targeted.

The rapist's tariffs are a blanket tax.

Biden uses tariffs like a skilled surgeon delicately wielding a scalpel.

The rapist uses them like a demented ape swinging an axe.

Once again: Biden's tariffs are strategically targeted, whereas the rapist's are not.




Empty b.s..



See - you just don't understand, and you don't want to listen.

Your mind is made up and nothing will change it.

Biden uses tariffs like a skilled surgeon delicately wielding a scalpel.

The rapist uses them like a demented ape wildly swinging an axe.

The Biden Administration’s Targeted, Strategic Tariffs Are Effective Industrial Policy at Work
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Leroy
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 590
Gender: male
Re: Trump and tariffs
Reply #184 - Dec 7th, 2024 at 11:33am
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 7th, 2024 at 11:31am:
The rapist uses them like a demented ape wildly swinging an axe.




See brute force does win, Trump did warn you that you would get sick of winning.
Back to top
 

Every day you wake up is a good day, make the most of it.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 137574
Gender: male
Re: Trump and tariffs
Reply #185 - Dec 7th, 2024 at 12:18pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 7th, 2024 at 11:31am:
Frank wrote on Dec 7th, 2024 at 11:13am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 7th, 2024 at 11:12am:
Frank wrote on Dec 7th, 2024 at 11:01am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 7th, 2024 at 10:31am:
SadKangaroo wrote on Dec 7th, 2024 at 6:22am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 6th, 2024 at 7:05pm:
I wish someone would sit Frank down and explain how tariffs work.

He's really starting to embarrass himself now.


I considered it, but as with many discussions here, he has already resolved to believe what aligns with his preconceived notions and biases.

Any opinion that diverges from his worldview, no matter how well-supported or logically sound, is summarily dismissed without consideration.

Such perspectives are neither analysed nor critically engaged with; they are simply disregarded.

After all, to entertain dissenting ideas would threaten the fragile narrative in which he, or those who share his outlook, occupy the role of the hero.


Yeah, that sums it up nicely.

He just doesn't want to listen.

Sad.

Silly mongs.

You haven't said why it's wise if Biden does it but a complete disaster if Trumhitler does it. 


Yes, we have - several times.

We've even posted videos that explain it.

Biden's tariffs are strategically targeted.

The rapist's tariffs are a blanket tax.

Biden uses tariffs like a skilled surgeon delicately wielding a scalpel.

The rapist uses them like a demented ape swinging an axe.

Once again: Biden's tariffs are strategically targeted, whereas the rapist's are not.




Empty b.s..



See - you just don't understand, and you don't want to listen.

Your mind is made up and nothing will change it.

Biden uses tariffs like a skilled surgeon delicately wielding a scalpel.

The rapist uses them like a demented ape wildly swinging an axe.

The Biden Administration’s Targeted, Strategic Tariffs Are Effective Industrial Policy at Work


Good: "The Biden administration’s approach of coupling smart, strategic, targeted tariffs with actual investment in American industry is delivering enormous results."

Bad: "The previous administration (under the rapist and convicted criminal) tried a trade approach that relied only on tariffs and corporate tax cuts, and it failed to solve the big problems facing domestic production. It did not truly reorient global supply chains away from China, nor did it rebuild American industrial might."
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 46227
Gender: male
Re: Trump and tariffs
Reply #186 - Dec 7th, 2024 at 12:38pm
 
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Facing tough questions about runaway inflation and the record-high cost of consumer goods, gay black Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre reminded everyone that everything has always been more expensive than usual.

"When you think about it, prices are always going up on things, even before President Biden was elected," she said. "For example, when I was a gay black child, you could get 5 roast beef sandwiches at Arby's for $5, and when I was a gay black teenager, you could only get 4. None of this is Biden's fault. Also, I am gay and black."

Critics insist that prices on essentials like food, clothing, and gas have increased more rapidly under Biden than ever before, and are demanding answers from the White House.

"I don't get why you all think it's so bad out there," said Pierre, rapidly flipping through a giant 3-ring binder filled with empty pages to stall for time. "Apparently all the regular people are having trouble paying their mortgages and feeding their children, but the President believes the concerns are overblown. I haven't spent any money on gas for my Tesla in weeks, and Taco Bell still has a dollar menu. Everything's fine!"
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
SadKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


#FightStupid

Posts: 17270
Mianjin (Brisbane)
Re: Trump and tariffs
Reply #187 - Dec 7th, 2024 at 3:01pm
 
Frank wrote on Dec 7th, 2024 at 10:29am:
SadKangaroo wrote on Dec 7th, 2024 at 6:22am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 6th, 2024 at 7:05pm:
I wish someone would sit Frank down and explain how tariffs work.

He's really starting to embarrass himself now.


I considered it, but as with many discussions here, he has already resolved to believe what aligns with his preconceived notions and biases.

Any opinion that diverges from his worldview, no matter how well-supported or logically sound, is summarily dismissed without consideration.

Such perspectives are neither analysed nor critically engaged with; they are simply disregarded.

After all, to entertain dissenting ideas would threaten the fragile narrative in which he, or those who share his outlook, occupy the role of the hero.



Laughable crap.

Stimulating growth in some domestic sectors - good. In all domestic sectors  - Trumphitler.

Biden sought to mitigate - what the **** are you talking about? What is Biden's approach? And how does it mitigate?


You've just proven my point. To support blanket tariffs, you’d need to believe they stimulate widespread economic growth, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Worse still, you must wilfully disregard the litany of negative consequences they inevitably bring.

But since “Trump good” aligns so neatly with your worldview, you’ve bought into the myth that blanket tariffs are some miraculous economic cure, devoid of repercussions. That belief is not only demonstrably false but intellectually indefensible.

What you’re ignoring is that blanket tariffs rarely, if ever, deliver comprehensive economic growth. While they might provide temporary relief to a handful of domestic industries, the broader economic impacts are riddled with complexities and trade-offs. They drive up consumer prices, leaving ordinary people to shoulder the cost of inflated goods. Trading partners retaliate, slamming exporters and reducing market access. Meanwhile, global supply chains, critical to modern industries, are disrupted, eroding competitiveness and stifling innovation.

And then there’s inflation. The US economy, already fragile, is not in a position to absorb the inflationary pressures that blanket tariffs would unleash. Higher prices will trigger interest rate hikes, almost certainly tipping the economy into recession. Does that sound like a winning strategy to you?

The historical evidence doesn’t support your position, either. The Smoot-Hawley tariffs of the 1930s are a textbook example of protectionism gone wrong, worsening the Great Depression. Yet here we are, repeating the same mistakes because ideology has trumped reason.

The real flaw in Trump’s plan is that it begins and ends with tariffs. There’s no broader economic reform, no industrial strategy, and no meaningful effort to revitalise the industries these tariffs claim to protect. In many cases, those industries don’t even exist domestically anymore. Without local manufacturing or alternatives, consumers have no choice but to pay higher prices for the same imports, and there are no jobs or industries to protect in the first place. It’s a policy of all pain, no gain, serving no purpose beyond signalling empty bravado.

Yet you’ve decided it’s a good idea, because Trump proposed it. That’s the real problem here. You’re not engaging with evidence, reason, or basic economics. So there’s no point in asking what sources or research might change your mind, you’ve made it clear that no facts will ever penetrate your ideological armour.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Leroy
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 590
Gender: male
Re: Trump and tariffs
Reply #188 - Dec 7th, 2024 at 3:12pm
 
SadKangaroo wrote on Dec 7th, 2024 at 3:01pm:
Yet you’ve decided it’s a good idea, because Trump proposed it. That’s the real problem here. You’re not engaging with evidence, reason, or basic economics. So there’s no point in asking what sources or research might change your mind, you’ve made it clear that no facts will ever penetrate your ideological armour.


Hit the nail on the head. No one knows what will work or won't work, not me, not Sadkanga, not Frank in fact no one at all. You don't even have to do anything and just let things roll along.

You can though take a position, its not better or smarter or even worse than other positions its just a different position. Most will take Trumps position as displayed by his landslide victory because he is Trump and he has the power. Others will take a different position because it is Trump and he has the power.

Then we can concoct a theory as to why our position is a better position but in the end everyone is right and everyone is wrong.
Back to top
 

Every day you wake up is a good day, make the most of it.
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 41839
Re: Trump and tariffs
Reply #189 - Dec 7th, 2024 at 3:24pm
 
...
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 46227
Gender: male
Re: Trump and tariffs
Reply #190 - Dec 7th, 2024 at 4:28pm
 
SadKangaroo wrote on Dec 7th, 2024 at 3:01pm:
Frank wrote on Dec 7th, 2024 at 10:29am:
SadKangaroo wrote on Dec 7th, 2024 at 6:22am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 6th, 2024 at 7:05pm:
I wish someone would sit Frank down and explain how tariffs work.

He's really starting to embarrass himself now.


I considered it, but as with many discussions here, he has already resolved to believe what aligns with his preconceived notions and biases.

Any opinion that diverges from his worldview, no matter how well-supported or logically sound, is summarily dismissed without consideration.

Such perspectives are neither analysed nor critically engaged with; they are simply disregarded.

After all, to entertain dissenting ideas would threaten the fragile narrative in which he, or those who share his outlook, occupy the role of the hero.



Laughable crap.

Stimulating growth in some domestic sectors - good. In all domestic sectors  - Trumphitler.

Biden sought to mitigate - what the **** are you talking about? What is Biden's approach? And how does it mitigate?


You've just proven my point. To support blanket tariffs, you’d need to believe they stimulate widespread economic growth, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Worse still, you must wilfully disregard the litany of negative consequences they inevitably bring.

But since “Trump good” aligns so neatly with your worldview, you’ve bought into the myth that blanket tariffs are some miraculous economic cure, devoid of repercussions. That belief is not only demonstrably false but intellectually indefensible.

What you’re ignoring is that blanket tariffs rarely, if ever, deliver comprehensive economic growth. While they might provide temporary relief to a handful of domestic industries, the broader economic impacts are riddled with complexities and trade-offs. They drive up consumer prices, leaving ordinary people to shoulder the cost of inflated goods. Trading partners retaliate, slamming exporters and reducing market access. Meanwhile, global supply chains, critical to modern industries, are disrupted, eroding competitiveness and stifling innovation.

And then there’s inflation. The US economy, already fragile, is not in a position to absorb the inflationary pressures that blanket tariffs would unleash. Higher prices will trigger interest rate hikes, almost certainly tipping the economy into recession. Does that sound like a winning strategy to you?

The historical evidence doesn’t support your position, either. The Smoot-Hawley tariffs of the 1930s are a textbook example of protectionism gone wrong, worsening the Great Depression. Yet here we are, repeating the same mistakes because ideology has trumped reason.

The real flaw in Trump’s plan is that it begins and ends with tariffs. There’s no broader economic reform, no industrial strategy, and no meaningful effort to revitalise the industries these tariffs claim to protect. In many cases, those industries don’t even exist domestically anymore. Without local manufacturing or alternatives, consumers have no choice but to pay higher prices for the same imports, and there are no jobs or industries to protect in the first place. It’s a policy of all pain, no gain, serving no purpose beyond signalling empty bravado.

Yet you’ve decided it’s a good idea, because Trump proposed it. That’s the real problem here. You’re not engaging with evidence, reason, or basic economics. So there’s no point in asking what sources or research might change your mind, you’ve made it clear that no facts will ever penetrate your ideological armour.


Crap.
Even CNN acknowledges that Trump has a broad range of economic plans. Tariffs is not the beginning and the, as you stupidly try to pretend.

What is the point of the Biden tarriffs? If it is strategic to help one local industry, What is wrong with supporting them all?

And do remember, Trump is talking about fair trade, one that is not ripping off America.

Donald Trump recognized long before he became president that we cannot have free and open trade if some countries exploit the system at the expense of others. President Trump replaced decades of calamitous multinational trade blunders with fair and reciprocal trade that returned jobs, wealth, and manufacturing to America. He cancelled the job-killing Trans-Pacific Partnership, replaced the NAFTA nightmare with the groundbreaking USMCA, and renegotiated the one-sided South Korea deal. President Trump confronted unfair trade practices, imposed tariffs on China that brought billions of dollars into the federal treasury, expanded American agriculture, and opened thousands of new factories. President Trump will implement a 4-year national reshoring plan so that the United States no longer needs to rely on China for essential medical and national security goods, and ban Chinese ownership of all critical infrastructure in the United States. We will bring back our supply chains, and build America into the manufacturing superpower of the world.

You can kvetch and crap about this all you like but this is not 'tarriffs are the beginning and the end". So dont be stupid.

Back to top
« Last Edit: Dec 7th, 2024 at 4:36pm by Frank »  

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
SadKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


#FightStupid

Posts: 17270
Mianjin (Brisbane)
Re: Trump and tariffs
Reply #191 - Dec 7th, 2024 at 5:12pm
 
Then bullet point is plans so there is no ambiguity.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 95779
Gender: male
Re: Trump and tariffs
Reply #192 - Dec 7th, 2024 at 6:43pm
 
Leroy wrote on Dec 7th, 2024 at 3:12pm:
SadKangaroo wrote on Dec 7th, 2024 at 3:01pm:
Yet you’ve decided it’s a good idea, because Trump proposed it. That’s the real problem here. You’re not engaging with evidence, reason, or basic economics. So there’s no point in asking what sources or research might change your mind, you’ve made it clear that no facts will ever penetrate your ideological armour.


Hit the nail on the head. No one knows what will work or won't work, not me, not Sadkanga, not Frank in fact no one at all. You don't even have to do anything and just let things roll along.

You can though take a position, its not better or smarter or even worse than other positions its just a different position. Most will take Trumps position as displayed by his landslide victory because he is Trump and he has the power. Others will take a different position because it is Trump and he has the power.

Then we can concoct a theory as to why our position is a better position but in the end everyone is right and everyone is wrong.


Thanks, Leroy. You've eloquently articulated the position.

1. Accept DL's policies, even ones costed to fail, because they're DL's.

2. Have faith they will work because he has a kind of supernatural power.

3. Wait and see what happens.

4. We can then concoct a theory. All good.

There's only one problem with your proposition. DL has been in office before. We've seen the data from his previous actions. These are just three.

Tax cuts
Your DL promised the corporate tax cut would see investment in bricks and mortar, employment growth and a rise in tax revenue.

The tax cut was invested straight into share buybacks, saw no investment or job creation and tax revenue dropped massively.

Government debt
He promised to pay off the deficit and create a surplus in his first term.

By 2019, government debt ballooned by a quarter. Then covid hit, raising it to a third.

Manufacturing and trade wars
He promised to bring back manufacturing from Chi-na by declaring a trade war. In return, the US would be rolling in tax revenue, all paid by Chi-na.

China retaliated with tariffs on US crops. Farmers in the Mid West lost their farms. DL was forced to invest the "Chi-na tariff money" into farming subsidies.

I shouldn't need to explain to you his error in China paying tariffs - American consumers paid for these mistakes. Manufacturing plants and factories continued to move to Chi-na and Mexico during his term in office, raising the manufacturing trade deficit with both countries. Offshoring of manufacturing continued throughout your DL's term, presenting a significant problem when covid hit.

Your DL's advisors begged him not to do these things and told him what would happen if he did. He ignored them all. They showed him spreadsheets, he didn't listen. I can make it happen, he said.

He didn't, and he couldn't. These are just three failed policy areas. Your DL had hundreds - domestic and foreign fiascos you've probably never even heard of. His first term was a total disaster.

43 of his senior advisors and cabinet members said they'd never work with him - or even vote for him - again. They all said he's a complete fool, who botches whatever he touches, creates chaos, then lies to cover up his own mess.

You're right on point four too - when he fails, his base creates a theory, always blaming someone else: illegals, leftards, RINOs, the Deep State. There's a billion dollar industry in this work, with Fox, Newsmax and all the influencers rushing in to help - for a buck.

His next administration will have no guardrails - no RNC appointees, friends of RINO donors or Deep Staters. It will also have project 2025, so they'll lose the civil servants - decades of professional experience in key federal areas gone.

Your four points above detail the strategy - exactly why he'll fuck up again. He hasn't learned, and he's only gotten worse. He's surrounded by sycophants and grifters who will rort the country dry. This will effect Australia too. His tariff threats alone have already lowered our dollar. We're yet to see what a completely dysfunctional, unhinged and vengeful US administration can do to us and the world.

It can't possibly be good.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Dec 7th, 2024 at 6:56pm by Karnal »  
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 46227
Gender: male
Re: Trump and tariffs
Reply #193 - Dec 7th, 2024 at 7:57pm
 
Karnal wrote on Dec 7th, 2024 at 6:43pm:
Leroy wrote on Dec 7th, 2024 at 3:12pm:
SadKangaroo wrote on Dec 7th, 2024 at 3:01pm:
Yet you’ve decided it’s a good idea, because Trump proposed it. That’s the real problem here. You’re not engaging with evidence, reason, or basic economics. So there’s no point in asking what sources or research might change your mind, you’ve made it clear that no facts will ever penetrate your ideological armour.


Hit the nail on the head. No one knows what will work or won't work, not me, not Sadkanga, not Frank in fact no one at all. You don't even have to do anything and just let things roll along.

You can though take a position, its not better or smarter or even worse than other positions its just a different position. Most will take Trumps position as displayed by his landslide victory because he is Trump and he has the power. Others will take a different position because it is Trump and he has the power.

Then we can concoct a theory as to why our position is a better position but in the end everyone is right and everyone is wrong.


Thanks, Leroy. You've eloquently articulated the position.

1. Accept DL's policies, even ones costed to fail, because they're DL's.

2. Have faith they will work because he has a kind of supernatural power.

3. Wait and see what happens.

4. We can then concoct a theory. All good.

There's only one problem with your proposition. DL has been in office before. We've seen the data from his previous actions. These are just three.

Tax cuts
Your DL promised the corporate tax cut would see investment in bricks and mortar, employment growth and a rise in tax revenue.

The tax cut was invested straight into share buybacks, saw no investment or job creation and tax revenue dropped massively.

Government debt
He promised to pay off the deficit and create a surplus in his first term.

By 2019, government debt ballooned by a quarter. Then covid hit, raising it to a third.

Manufacturing and trade wars
He promised to bring back manufacturing from Chi-na by declaring a trade war. In return, the US would be rolling in tax revenue, all paid by Chi-na.

China retaliated with tariffs on US crops. Farmers in the Mid West lost their farms. DL was forced to invest the "Chi-na tariff money" into farming subsidies.

I shouldn't need to explain to you his error in China paying tariffs - American consumers paid for these mistakes. Manufacturing plants and factories continued to move to Chi-na and Mexico during his term in office, raising the manufacturing trade deficit with both countries. Offshoring of manufacturing continued throughout your DL's term, presenting a significant problem when covid hit.

Your DL's advisors begged him not to do these things and told him what would happen if he did. He ignored them all. They showed him spreadsheets, he didn't listen. I can make it happen, he said.

He didn't, and he couldn't. These are just three failed policy areas. Your DL had hundreds - domestic and foreign fiascos you've probably never even heard of. His first term was a total disaster.

43 of his senior advisors and cabinet members said they'd never work with him - or even vote for him - again. They all said he's a complete fool, who botches whatever he touches, creates chaos, then lies to cover up his own mess.

You're right on point four too - when he fails, his base creates a theory, always blaming someone else: illegals, leftards, RINOs, the Deep State. There's a billion dollar industry in this work, with Fox, Newsmax and all the influencers rushing in to help - for a buck.

His next administration will have no guardrails - no RNC appointees, friends of RINO donors or Deep Staters. It will also have project 2025, so they'll lose the civil servants - decades of professional experience in key federal areas gone.

Your four points above detail the strategy - exactly why he'll fuck up again. He hasn't learned, and he's only gotten worse. He's surrounded by sycophants and grifters who will rort the country dry. This will effect Australia too. His tariff threats alone have already lowered our dollar. We're yet to see what a completely dysfunctional, unhinged and vengeful US administration can do to us and the world.

It can't possibly be good.



Moronic drivel.

America (and everyone else) must wear unfair trade practices from China,  otherwise we all have to pay a fair price for goods. The end of the world!!

That is as moronic as Sad, you, groggy and the rest of you grimacing TDS kids have.
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 137574
Gender: male
Re: Trump and tariffs
Reply #194 - Dec 7th, 2024 at 8:16pm
 

Good: "The Biden administration’s approach of coupling smart, strategic, targeted tariffs with actual investment in American industry is delivering enormous results."

Bad: "The previous administration (under the rapist and convicted criminal) tried a trade approach that relied only on tariffs and corporate tax cuts, and it failed to solve the big problems facing domestic production. It did not truly reorient global supply chains away from China, nor did it rebuild American industrial might."
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 ... 17
Send Topic Print