Sir Eoin O Fada wrote Yesterday at 2:50pm:
Karnal wrote Yesterday at 1:17am:
Panther wrote on Dec 6
th, 2024 at 12:11pm:
..
Local sheriffs seen playing key role in mass deportation plan:
Homan warns sanctuary mayors
Source: Quote:A large number of America’s sheriffs see President-elect Donald Trump’s victory as a mandate to get tough on illegal immigration.
“Many conservative sheriffs across the U.S., from Texas to California to redder swaths of the northeast, now stand ready to be force multipliers for ICE and its 6,000 agents,” the Wall Street Journal reported on Nov. 28.
Tom Homan / C-SPAN
Chuck Jenkins, the longtime Republican sheriff in Maryland’s Frederick County, where voters went for Democrats in the last two presidential elections, said he is willing support Trump’s immigration policies “100%.”
“I want to do more, within the law,” the Journal cited Jenkins as saying............
..
Local law enforcement, is it? What does your beloved Constitution have to say about federal powers usurping state law, Panther?
I'm curious.
Exact opposite, it’s the State supporting Federal law.
Nowhere does it say thar a State should not support Federal laws.
Yes Sir, but I'm asking Panther how the Feds can dictate the policies and procedures of local law enforcement. I'm wondering what the Constitution has to say about this.
I believe that Panther, as a staunch defender of state powers, will take issue with the expansion of federalism to such a degree. If I remember rightly, he was highly triggered when Sleepy Joe advised the governor of Texas to remove his man traps from federal land upon the border.
Never ever, Panther said. The state of Texas has every right in the world to defend its border from the invading illegals.
No, we said, we beg to differ. The federal Department of Homeland Security defends the US border, states can only say what goes on within their own jurisdictions.
No, Panther said, state rights, innit. Read your Constitution. The Feds have no right to trespass upon federal land and remove Texan booby traps.
Sorry, we said, did you say federal land?
Panther didn't answer that. Still, we distinctly remember his position towards the right of states to police their borders, administer their territory and command their own police forces.
A president may not make demands on local police, he said. No sir, never ever. Panther may even have made a reference to hell freezing over first.
The way Panther's been going, I'd say hell must be pretty cold by now.
You?