Dnarever wrote on Dec 11^th, 2024 at 9:22pm:



woke is dead my friend

it died at the 2024 election

the swinging voters were found not to have cared much about inflation and the economy.

their number 1 issue was the lefts attack on culture, the trans issues, the DEI issues

woke cost the left the election

its stone cold , dead in the water

teenage girls are running protests over trans in bathrooms
footballers are refusing to wear the pride rainbow colours
the NFL are openly doing the trump dance as a touchdown celebration.
JK Rowling is no longer hailed a a transphobe, she is now hailed as a hero
ayan herhii ali is being welcomed into a leftie think tank after being shamed as an islamophobe
the surgical treatment of girls under 18 is now banned across europe after some horrific stories of double mastectomies being performed on 13 yo"s.

woke is over

even the leftie elite can see the writing on the wall

they will probably throw the trans issue under the bus

Leroy wrote on Dec 12^th, 2024 at 11:54am:


I've let your other statements go unchecked, but you're going to need to provide a little more info on this claim, especially after you're claiming healthcare was improved under Trump, when 2.3 million lost their healthcare as a direct result of his policies.  That's another of your claims that should have been questioned.

Leroy wrote on Dec 12^th, 2024 at 12:47pm:


Interesting, so I'll take that as a refusal.

SadKangaroo wrote on Dec 12^th, 2024 at 1:09pm:


And white flag.

Frank wrote on Dec 12^th, 2024 at 1:55pm:


There’s quite a lot to unpack here, Frank. First and foremost, it appears that, once again, you’re skimming headlines in search of a mic-drop moment, without realising that what you’ve shared actually reinforces my argument.

From your own post:

Frank wrote on Dec 12^th, 2024 at 1:55pm:


Right off the bat, these are not indiscriminate tariffs akin to those imposed by 45, but rather targeted measures focusing on specific solar panel components. So already the risks of 45's plan including raising inflation, interest rates and a push closer to a recession do not apply.

Delving into the rationale behind this decision reveals a comprehensive strategy by his administration. This approach encompasses protective measures, investment incentives from the Inflation Reduction Act and other sources, and efforts to expand the domestic industry, all aligning with his broader agenda to foster the growth of Green jobs.

Quote:


Your concern about higher costs for imported components, ultimately passed on to the consumer, is entirely valid.

But mate, that's precisely been my point about 45. Consumers will be incentivised to purchase domestically produced goods from industries that the Biden administration has spent years cultivating as part of his vision for a Green economy.

But what happens if there are no local alternatives? Consumers would indeed face higher costs, which is why this policy was meticulously focused on specific components rather than indiscriminate blanket tariffs.

Quote:


Surely, by now, the distinction is glaring.

45’s tariffs are not targeted at particular sectors or industries. Instead, if his rhetoric is to be believed, they’re intended as sweeping measures imposed on all imports from China, Mexico, and Canada.

This approach would affect an enormous range of goods for which local alternatives don’t exist or rely heavily on tariffed components in their supply chains.

Furthermore, there’s no evidence of a strategic, long-term plan to build robust local industries over several years in preparation for such tariffs. Instead, 45 has declared his intent to implement them immediately upon taking office.

And what does he plan to do with the revenue generated?

Will it be reinvested into programs to alleviate the burden on consumers facing an already crushing global cost-of-living crisis?

Of course not.

He’ll perpetuate the lie that China is footing the bill, mischaracterising tariffs as a "tax on China," and divert the funds towards tax cuts for the wealthy.

Again, that’s assuming he’s not simply lying, which, given his track record, is a generous assumption.

Do you finally grasp the distinction between these two approaches? Can you see the difference yet?

SadKangaroo wrote on Dec 12^th, 2024 at 2:59pm:


You are fighting a losing battle.

He will never understand.

SK and Peccary can't admit that their Leftism, woke, Media attempt at politics is still part of the World's political and military problems.
Germany and the Confederacy are done and dusted.
Now the Leftism holds on via France and the Democrats.
But the cracks are showing and they're getting desperate.
They'll be gone from politics too soon. Suicide is painless in their political correctness of perfection beyond being human at all.
Finally the Left will run to Italy in Europe and the Media in America as their last stand.
But they will finally fail there too.

You're both just Lefty LOSERS who can't admit defeat, even when you lose and keep losing.😆😂🤣