Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Poll Poll
Question: Do you support or oppose using Nuclear power in Australia?

Strongly Support    
  9 (60.0%)
Somewhat Support    
  1 (6.7%)
Strongly Oppose    
  2 (13.3%)
Somewhat Oppose    
  2 (13.3%)
Don't know    
  1 (6.7%)




Total votes: 15
« Created by: Captain Nemo on: Dec 13th, 2024 at 2:28pm »

Pages: 1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 19
Send Topic Print
Nuclear Power To Cost Twice As Much As Renewables (Read 4302 times)
Leroy
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 762
Gender: male
Re: Nuclear Power To Cost Twice As Much As Renewables
Reply #225 - Yesterday at 10:02am
 
freediver wrote Yesterday at 10:01am:
Quote:
They have to be monitored 24hrs a day


Grin

So what, you pay someone to stand there watching the battery?


No normally it would be two, worksafe practices with high voltage is a minimum of two.
Back to top
 

Every day you wake up is a good day, make the most of it.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49133
At my desk.
Re: Nuclear Power To Cost Twice As Much As Renewables
Reply #226 - Yesterday at 10:24am
 
Leroy wrote Yesterday at 10:02am:
freediver wrote Yesterday at 10:01am:
Quote:
They have to be monitored 24hrs a day


Grin

So what, you pay someone to stand there watching the battery?


No normally it would be two, worksafe practices with high voltage is a minimum of two.


Just to stand there watching it?

Do you think this is what the LNP is assuming with their costs, while assuming it costs nothing to store radioactive nuclear waste for a few hundred thousand years?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Leroy
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 762
Gender: male
Re: Nuclear Power To Cost Twice As Much As Renewables
Reply #227 - Yesterday at 11:00am
 
freediver wrote Yesterday at 10:24am:
Leroy wrote Yesterday at 10:02am:
freediver wrote Yesterday at 10:01am:
Quote:
They have to be monitored 24hrs a day


Grin

So what, you pay someone to stand there watching the battery?


No normally it would be two, worksafe practices with high voltage is a minimum of two.


Just to stand there watching it?

Do you think this is what the LNP is assuming with their costs, while assuming it costs nothing to store radioactive nuclear waste for a few hundred thousand years?


Its called firewatch, you can't just install batteries and leave them. Security is also another issue, they will need 24hr security services.

You know if they did need to use the batteries which are limited to about an hours use a day it would be a disaster if they were not charged or the cabling connections were corroded. You have to have someone on site in case there is a problem, you can't wait until someone might be available later. Electricity supply is continuous, imagine telling your customers you will get power back after Jim comes back from fishing and he will go and see what the problem is.
Back to top
 

Every day you wake up is a good day, make the most of it.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49133
At my desk.
Re: Nuclear Power To Cost Twice As Much As Renewables
Reply #228 - Yesterday at 12:03pm
 
Quote:
Its called firewatch, you can't just install batteries and leave them. Security is also another issue, they will need 24hr security services
.

Unlike radioactive waste with nuclear weapons potential being stored for 100000 years?

Quote:
You know if they did need to use the batteries which are limited to about an hours use a day


Grin

No wonder the LNP went down this garden path. Some people actually believe it.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 74740
Gender: male
Re: Nuclear Power To Cost Twice As Much As Renewables
Reply #229 - Yesterday at 12:06pm
 
Leroy wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 4:40pm:
John Smith wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 4:23pm:
Leroy wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 4:17pm:
over 40-50 years it will be much cheaper to have nuclear.



Only if you don't include costs of storing waste for the next 500yrs or build costs Cheesy Cheesycrap


If you want to be sensible we can have a discussion but if you are just going to be obstinate on a topic you are not familiar with then its pointless.


Whats sensible about ignoring a large portion of the costs?  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy You don't want a discussion, you just want to read from the  liberal party song sheet Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49133
At my desk.
Re: Nuclear Power To Cost Twice As Much As Renewables
Reply #230 - Yesterday at 12:18pm
 
John Smith wrote Yesterday at 12:06pm:
Leroy wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 4:40pm:
John Smith wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 4:23pm:
Leroy wrote on Jan 13th, 2025 at 4:17pm:
over 40-50 years it will be much cheaper to have nuclear.



Only if you don't include costs of storing waste for the next 500yrs or build costs Cheesy Cheesycrap


If you want to be sensible we can have a discussion but if you are just going to be obstinate on a topic you are not familiar with then its pointless.


Whats sensible about ignoring a large portion of the costs?  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy You don't want a discussion, you just want to read from the  liberal party song sheet Roll Eyes


I don't think the LNP would be silly enough to actually put this nonsense in writing.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 17812
Gender: male
Re: Nuclear Power To Cost Twice As Much As Renewables
Reply #231 - Yesterday at 12:40pm
 
freediver wrote Yesterday at 9:27am:
What maintenance do you do on a battery?


You have never heard of a battery failing? That comes down to maintenance. You have to keep an eye on them. Or maybe you have just never learned of a battery load test as opposed to just sticking a voltmeter across the terminals. Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49133
At my desk.
Re: Nuclear Power To Cost Twice As Much As Renewables
Reply #232 - Yesterday at 12:46pm
 
Quote:
You have never heard of a battery failing?


Sure. I throw it out and replace it. I wouldn't call it maintenance though.

You have no clue at all what this "battery maintenance" actually costs, do you?

Batteries would be the lowest maintenance item in the whole system. It would not take much to incorporate everyone's wall mounted battery and car battery into the system, with little or no extra capital expenditure and no maintenance cost. Plus all of our hydro systems are better than batteries.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 17812
Gender: male
Re: Nuclear Power To Cost Twice As Much As Renewables
Reply #233 - Yesterday at 1:02pm
 
freediver wrote Yesterday at 12:46pm:
You have no clue at all what this "battery maintenance" actually costs, do you?

Batteries would be the lowest maintenance item in the whole system. It would not take much to incorporate everyone's wall mounted battery and car battery into the system, with little or no extra capital expenditure and no maintenance cost. Plus all of our hydro systems are better than batteries.


More from that posted link.

"2. Operating and Maintenance Costs

The operating and maintenance costs of a 1 MWh BESS include the cost of electricity for charging the batteries, the cost of cooling and other ancillary systems, and the cost of maintenance and repair services. These costs can vary depending on the usage patterns of the system and the local electricity rates.

Generally, the operating and maintenance costs of a 1 MWh BESS are relatively low compared to the capital cost. However, they can still add up over time and should be considered when evaluating the overall cost-effectiveness of the system.

3. Lifetime Costs

The lifetime cost of a 1 MWh BESS includes the capital cost, operating and maintenance costs, and the cost of replacing the batteries over the lifetime of the system. The lifetime of a BESS can vary depending on several factors, including the type of batteries used, the usage patterns, and the maintenance practices. Generally, lithium-ion batteries have a lifespan of about 10-15 years, while lead-acid batteries have a shorter lifespan of about 5-10 years.

When evaluating the lifetime cost of a 1 MWh BESS, it is important to consider the cost of battery replacement and the potential for technology advancements that could reduce the cost of the system over time."

" relatively low compared to the capital cost" does not mean zero.

Now as to pumped hydro.  How long does it take to get environmental approval. Seeing as you have to have an upper dam and a lower dam. Both involve the drowning of land. That destroys the environment. So ruining the environment to save the planet is okay?

Shouldn't the Greens be about saving the environment? Wink
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49133
At my desk.
Re: Nuclear Power To Cost Twice As Much As Renewables
Reply #234 - Yesterday at 1:35pm
 
Quote:
relatively low


That's what it costs eh? I'm glad you know so much.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Leroy
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 762
Gender: male
Re: Nuclear Power To Cost Twice As Much As Renewables
Reply #235 - Yesterday at 2:20pm
 
freediver wrote Yesterday at 12:46pm:
Quote:
You have never heard of a battery failing?


Sure. I throw it out and replace it. I wouldn't call it maintenance though.

You have no clue at all what this "battery maintenance" actually costs, do you?

Batteries would be the lowest maintenance item in the whole system. It would not take much to incorporate everyone's wall mounted battery and car battery into the system, with little or no extra capital expenditure and no maintenance cost. Plus all of our hydro systems are better than batteries.


Batteries cannot make power. the cost of batteries is not the cost of making the power, its only the cost of storing the power.

Coal, gas and nuclear make the actual power, without them the batteries are useless.



Back to top
 

Every day you wake up is a good day, make the most of it.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49133
At my desk.
Re: Nuclear Power To Cost Twice As Much As Renewables
Reply #236 - Yesterday at 2:35pm
 
Quote:
Batteries cannot make power. the cost of batteries is not the cost of making the power, its only the cost of storing the power.


Thanks for the update Leroy. It's good to have such knowledgeable LNP supporters around.

You don't know what they cost by any chance?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Leroy
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 762
Gender: male
Re: Nuclear Power To Cost Twice As Much As Renewables
Reply #237 - Yesterday at 2:46pm
 
freediver wrote Yesterday at 2:35pm:
Quote:
Batteries cannot make power. the cost of batteries is not the cost of making the power, its only the cost of storing the power.


Thanks for the update Leroy. It's good to have such knowledgeable LNP supporters around.

You don't know what they cost by any chance?


2.8 bil will get you 2000mwh. Thats just construction.

thats 640 container size batteries
40,000sqm of space required.


Back to top
 

Every day you wake up is a good day, make the most of it.
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 17812
Gender: male
Re: Nuclear Power To Cost Twice As Much As Renewables
Reply #238 - Yesterday at 3:26pm
 
freediver wrote Yesterday at 1:35pm:
Quote:
relatively low


That's what it costs eh? I'm glad you know so much.


So you can give a more accurate figure? Go for it. Wink
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49133
At my desk.
Re: Nuclear Power To Cost Twice As Much As Renewables
Reply #239 - Yesterday at 3:46pm
 
lee wrote Yesterday at 3:26pm:
freediver wrote Yesterday at 1:35pm:
Quote:
relatively low


That's what it costs eh? I'm glad you know so much.


So you can give a more accurate figure? Go for it. Wink


I agree with your figures. It is relatively low. Compared to the capital expenditure.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 19
Send Topic Print