Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Poll Poll
Question: Who has the better energy plan?

Coalition    
  9 (56.2%)
Labor    
  5 (31.2%)
Don't know    
  2 (12.5%)




Total votes: 16
« Created by: Armchair_Politician on: Dec 13th, 2024 at 4:44pm »

Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 
Send Topic Print
Nuclear power to cost almost half ALP renewables (Read 3826 times)
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Online


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49060
At my desk.
Re: Nuclear power to cost almost half ALP renewables
Reply #165 - Dec 27th, 2024 at 5:50pm
 
Quote:
Who said reducing income tax? I said a payment to taxpayers, which is income tax exempt from the government. At least those cost-of-living payments so far have been. And you think that won't continue?


I would have to know what you are talking about to answer your questions Lee. All I see is a pool of dribble under your chin, completely unrelated to the topic we are discussing.

lee wrote on Dec 24th, 2024 at 5:10pm:
Even if that carbon tax is somehow distributed to the taxpayers generally, it is a subsidy on their costs.


The easiest way to distribute it to taxpayers generally is to reduce income tax Lee. Not sure how you manage to turn that into some kind of subsidy. Do you have a problem with tax cuts, or are you just dribbling?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17652
Gender: male
Re: Nuclear power to cost almost half ALP renewables
Reply #166 - Dec 27th, 2024 at 6:56pm
 
freediver wrote on Dec 27th, 2024 at 5:50pm:
The easiest way to distribute it to taxpayers generally is to reduce income tax Lee.


And yet that is something they haven't done with the cost-of-living payments. Perhaps you can explain why not? Wink

freediver wrote on Dec 27th, 2024 at 5:50pm:
Not sure how you manage to turn that into some kind of subsidy.


You are the one calling them tax cuts, not me. Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Online



Posts: 48549
Gender: male
Re: Nuclear power to cost almost half ALP renewables
Reply #167 - Dec 27th, 2024 at 6:59pm
 
Fight Fight Fight!!!😆
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Online


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49060
At my desk.
Re: Nuclear power to cost almost half ALP renewables
Reply #168 - Dec 27th, 2024 at 7:15pm
 
Quote:
And yet that is something they haven't done with the cost-of-living payments. Perhaps you can explain why not?


Because they are two different things Lee. Do I need to explain everything the government has ever done to get you to stop dribbling? Do I need to explain why building roads is not a tax cut?

Quote:
You are the one calling them tax cuts


I am calling tax cuts tax cuts Lee. What are you calling them? And why do you think income tax cuts are such a bad thing that you try to twist them into a subsidy?

lee wrote on Dec 24th, 2024 at 5:10pm:
Even if that carbon tax is somehow distributed to the taxpayers generally, it is a subsidy on their costs.


The easiest way to distribute it to taxpayers generally is to reduce income tax Lee. Not sure how you manage to turn that into some kind of subsidy. Do you have a problem with tax cuts, or are you just dribbling? And what do you think is being subsidised?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17652
Gender: male
Re: Nuclear power to cost almost half ALP renewables
Reply #169 - Dec 27th, 2024 at 7:37pm
 
freediver wrote on Dec 27th, 2024 at 7:15pm:
Quote:
And yet that is something they haven't done with the cost-of-living payments. Perhaps you can explain why not?

Because they are two different things Lee.


And yet that is precisely what the energy component of the cost-of living payment is. You seem very confused. Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

freediver wrote on Dec 27th, 2024 at 7:15pm:
I am calling tax cuts tax cuts Lee.


And yet there is no government call for further tax cuts. Roll Eyes

freediver wrote on Dec 27th, 2024 at 7:15pm:
The easiest way to distribute it to taxpayers generally is to reduce income tax Lee. Not sure how you manage to turn that into some kind of subsidy. Do you have a problem with tax cuts, or are you just dribbling? And what do you think is being subsidised?


Oh dear. Mindless repetition. Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Online



Posts: 48549
Gender: male
Re: Nuclear power to cost almost half ALP renewables
Reply #170 - Dec 27th, 2024 at 7:41pm
 
Only allowed 3 strikes for repetition, then it's trolling.
FD you might get banned.
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17652
Gender: male
Re: Nuclear power to cost almost half ALP renewables
Reply #171 - Dec 28th, 2024 at 12:35pm
 
freediver wrote on Dec 27th, 2024 at 7:15pm:
The easiest way to distribute it to taxpayers generally is to reduce income tax Lee.



Ah, now I see. You are confusing easy with politicians. Wink
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 
Send Topic Print