Australian Politics Forum - Monk banned Aussie

Jasin Gold Member Offline Posts: 49309 Gender:	Re: Monk banned Aussie Reply #420 - Feb 3^rd, 2025 at 4:51pm Blah blah. You lose
Back to top	AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY. IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 106377
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Monk banned Aussie
Reply #421 - Feb 3^rd, 2025 at 8:01pm

Aussie wrote on Feb 3^rd, 2025 at 2:09pm:

Jasin wrote on Feb 3^rd, 2025 at 11:31am:

Why didn't you ban Monk from Relationships while you asked other Mods to ban him from their boards?

I do not discuss the contents of PMs in public. I respect the Rules here, and people's privacy, unlike you.

Hi Aussie,
have you had a change of heart since your PM rule as the former Exalted Leader at Polanimal?

https://www.polanimal.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=96&t=19517

3. Personal/Private Messages

Post by Aussie » Wed Apr 06, 2022 10:12 am
THE POSTING OF PERSONAL/PRIVATE MESSAGES.

From this date and including this date (5th April, 2022) forward, personal/private messages CAN be posted by the recipient, absolutely. When you send a personal/private message, be well aware that the recipient CAN make its contents public including posting it in its entirety. Take responsibility for what you say. No more hiding behind some wall of alleged, and now false sense, of confidentiality. This is a Forum not a national security organization.

HOWEVER:

You may not post the content of any personal/private message received PRIOR to this date, 5th April, 2022 ABSOLUTELY, but with this one exception.

If a poster, Bill Blogs let’s call him, makes a post on Forum which contradicts what he has said to you in a personal/private message sent to you before this date, you MAY post that personal/private message. Bill Blogs may not hide behind any claim of confidentiality and then lie like a pig in poo on the same subject matter on forum, no matter what that subject matter is.

Back to top

IP Logged

Bobby. Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 106377 Melbourne Gender:	Re: Monk banned Aussie Reply #422 - Feb 3^rd, 2025 at 8:01pm .
Back to top	IP Logged

Bobby. Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 106377 Melbourne Gender:	Re: Monk banned Aussie Reply #423 - Feb 3^rd, 2025 at 8:01pm .
Back to top	IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38838
Gender: male

Re: Monk banned Aussie
Reply #424 - Feb 4^th, 2025 at 7:23am

Bobby. wrote on Feb 3^rd, 2025 at 8:01pm:

Aussie wrote on Feb 3^rd, 2025 at 2:09pm:

Jasin wrote on Feb 3^rd, 2025 at 11:31am:

Why didn't you ban Monk from Relationships while you asked other Mods to ban him from their boards?

I do not discuss the contents of PMs in public. I respect the Rules here, and people's privacy, unlike you.

Hi Aussie,
have you had a change of heart since your PM rule as the former Exalted Leader at Polanimal?

https://www.polanimal.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=96&t=19517

3. Personal/Private Messages

Post by Aussie » Wed Apr 06, 2022 10:12 am
THE POSTING OF PERSONAL/PRIVATE MESSAGES.

From this date and including this date (5th April, 2022) forward, personal/private messages CAN be posted by the recipient, absolutely. When you send a personal/private message, be well aware that the recipient CAN make its contents public including posting it in its entirety. Take responsibility for what you say. No more hiding behind some wall of alleged, and now false sense, of confidentiality. This is a Forum not a national security organization.

HOWEVER:

You may not post the content of any personal/private message received PRIOR to this date, 5th April, 2022 ABSOLUTELY, but with this one exception.

If a poster, Bill Blogs let’s call him, makes a post on Forum which contradicts what he has said to you in a personal/private message sent to you before this date, you MAY post that personal/private message. Bill Blogs may not hide behind any claim of confidentiality and then lie like a pig in poo on the same subject matter on forum, no matter what that subject matter is.

I cannot make Rules HERE which contradict those of FD.

Back to top

IP Logged

Jasin Gold Member Offline Posts: 49309 Gender:	Re: Monk banned Aussie Reply #425 - Feb 4^th, 2025 at 7:54am The 'answer' Bobby, that Aussie is reluctant to admit to, is that he did what he did because he is, quite simply - an imbecile that thinks he's smarter than he really is.
Back to top	AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY. IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 106377
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Monk banned Aussie
Reply #426 - Feb 4^th, 2025 at 8:08am

Aussie wrote on Feb 4^th, 2025 at 7:23am:

I cannot make Rules HERE which contradict those of FD.

But there is a loophole:

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/forum-rules.html

" While the rules outlined here apply to the entire forum,
moderators of member run boards may go beyond them and
be as strict, biased, vague, or whatever, as they want."

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38838
Gender: male

Re: Monk banned Aussie
Reply #427 - Feb 4^th, 2025 at 1:10pm

Bobby. wrote on Feb 4^th, 2025 at 8:08am:

Aussie wrote on Feb 4^th, 2025 at 7:23am:

I cannot make Rules HERE which contradict those of FD.

But there is a loophole:

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/forum-rules.html

" While the rules outlined here apply to the entire forum,
moderators of member run boards may go beyond them and
be as strict, biased, vague, or whatever, as they want."

That is not a loop hole. FD's ban prevails.

Back to top

IP Logged

Jasin

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 49309
Gender: male

Re: Monk banned Aussie
Reply #428 - Feb 4^th, 2025 at 2:06pm

I didn't post a PM up.
I just made it up and Aussie just went along with it with confirmation because he's an idiot. This Aussie's hypocritical plan came back on him and thus Monk gave him his year ban. Aussie should have banned Monk from Relationships.
Aussie's only move now is to post the actual PM to prove me wrong... which, as Aussie points out, will get him a Forum wide ban from FD for a month.

Aussie the former lawyer, now Cabbie. Shouldn't mess with Jasin the former cabbie, now Lawyer. Wink

Back to top

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38838
Gender: male

Re: Monk banned Aussie
Reply #429 - Feb 4^th, 2025 at 2:24pm

Jasin wrote on Feb 4^th, 2025 at 2:06pm:

I didn't post a PM up.
I just made it up and Aussie just went along with it with confirmation because he's an idiot. This Aussie's hypocritical plan came back on him and thus Monk gave him his year ban. Aussie should have banned Monk from Relationships.
Aussie's only move now is to post the actual PM to prove me wrong... which, as Aussie points out, will get him a Forum wide ban from FD for a month.

Aussie the former lawyer, now Cabbie. Shouldn't mess with Jasin the former cabbie, now Lawyer. Wink

Not going to happen. If Monk wants to act on your word, that is on him.

Back to top

IP Logged

Jasin

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 49309
Gender: male

Re: Monk banned Aussie
Reply #430 - Feb 4^th, 2025 at 2:36pm

He didn't act on 'my' word Aussie.
We all know he PM'd you as he posted that he would, to see what 'YOU' had to say about it in private. Obviously YOU failed to convince him and the end result was you getting a year's ban from C&C Board.

Maybe if you were more honest in your dealings and stick by your own words - things may have worked out better for you. In the end, you shot yourself in your undies when you thought you were only farting.

Your fault, not mine.

Ever see the movie, the Good, the Bad and the Ugly?
Eh, Angel Eyes?
Ugly Monk took you out. Not me. My gun was pointed at Monk and guess what? He's banned for a month. Grin

Back to top

« Last Edit: Feb 4^th, 2025 at 2:42pm by Jasin »

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38838
Gender: male

Re: Monk banned Aussie
Reply #431 - Feb 4^th, 2025 at 3:38pm

Jasin wrote on Feb 4^th, 2025 at 2:36pm:

He didn't act on 'my' word Aussie.
We all know he PM'd you as he posted that he would, to see what 'YOU' had to say about it in private. Obviously YOU failed to convince him and the end result was you getting a year's ban from C&C Board.

Maybe if you were more honest in your dealings and stick by your own words - things may have worked out better for you. In the end, you shot yourself in your undies when you thought you were only farting.

Your fault, not mine.

Ever see the movie, the Good, the Bad and the Ugly?
Eh, Angel Eyes?
Ugly Monk took you out. Not me. My gun was pointed at Monk and guess what? He's banned for a month. Grin

In your stupid drug addled or demented dreams.

Back to top

IP Logged

Jasin Gold Member Offline Posts: 49309 Gender:	Re: Monk banned Aussie Reply #432 - Feb 4^th, 2025 at 3:53pm Oh the old 'drugs' excuse for denial. 😆😂🤣
Back to top	AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY. IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 106377
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Monk banned Aussie
Reply #433 - Feb 4^th, 2025 at 6:22pm

Aussie wrote on Feb 4^th, 2025 at 1:10pm:

Bobby. wrote on Feb 4^th, 2025 at 8:08am:

Aussie wrote on Feb 4^th, 2025 at 7:23am:

I cannot make Rules HERE which contradict those of FD.

But there is a loophole:

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/forum-rules.html

" While the rules outlined here apply to the entire forum,
moderators of member run boards may go beyond them and
be as strict, biased, vague, or whatever, as they want."

That is not a loop hole. FD's ban prevails.

Looks like a loophole to me. Undecided

Will you allow your PMs to be posted?

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 38838 Gender:	Re: Monk banned Aussie Reply #434 - Yesterday at 9:46am No, it is clearly contrary to FD's OzPol privacy/personal information Rule.
Back to top	IP Logged