Brian Ross wrote on Dec 24
th, 2024 at 12:05pm:
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Dec 23
rd, 2024 at 4:30pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Dec 23
rd, 2024 at 3:38pm:
Gordon wrote on Dec 23
rd, 2024 at 1:55pm:
Good video, says it all.
There was no nation, just a bunch of dispersed and disconnected rudimentary hunter gatherers who had little to do with other groups outside of their local areas.
And who is to say that they cannot develop a sense of nationhood post settlement? Tsk, tsk, tsk...
Yes - it's called Australian.... tsk, tsk, tsk.
A nation that has essentially ignored their development throughout it's short history.
Quote:So now some hypothetical 'sense of nationhood' means they were and are a nation?
They are as much a nation as any other. Most nations consist of disparate cultural and language groups. Switzerland has three distinct language and cultural groups. Italy has many cultural groups. France many. Belgium two. China hundreds, India many. Tsk, tsk, tsk...
Most nations have a history that binds them, a shared culture, literature, art, affinity and solidarity that brings them together. It is a distinctly European notion, evident only in European and European- derived countries/cultures. Even Japan is a European-derivided nation in this sense, from the 19th century.
This is why most Asian, Arab and African countries are not nations.
Aborigines certainly aren't. I would hazard that almost all Aboriginal self-understanding is thanks to British colonisation: writing down their stories, languages, post-1788 history, self-consciouness AS Aborigines. Their entire Aboriginal identity is possible only because of the arrival of the British.
Aborigines had no history, no shared culture,