Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
First Nations? (Read 559 times)
Aquarius
Full Member
***
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 181
Northern Beaches
Gender: female
Re: First Nations?
Reply #30 - Jan 5th, 2025 at 2:54pm
 


Aboriginals were never "nations" - they had no concept of such a thing.  They were simply a disparate number of nomadic tribes who had little contact with each other except in times of drought and floods when they fought over scarce resources of food and water. 

To call each of these small nomadic tribes a "nation," is the greatest misappropriation of any word in the English language ever known.  And they stole that idea of "nations" from the North American Indians because they haven't the ability to even contemplate such a thing themselves.

This is just another example of sociologists and Abo activists trying to rewrite history and present themselves as civilised.  Just another myth.   

That anyone could possibly give any credence to this sort of crap is laughable. 

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 46712
Gender: male
Re: First Nations?
Reply #31 - Jan 5th, 2025 at 3:11pm
 
Aquarius wrote on Jan 5th, 2025 at 2:54pm:
Aboriginals were never "nations" - they had no concept of such a thing.  They were simply a disparate number of nomadic tribes who had little contact with each other except in times of drought and floods when they fought over scarce resources of food and water. 

To call each of these small nomadic tribes a "nation," is the greatest misappropriation of any word in the English language ever known.  And they stole that idea of "nations" from the North American Indians because they haven't the ability to even contemplate such a thing themselves.

This is just another example of sociologists and Abo activists trying to rewrite history and present themselves as civilised.  Just another myth.   

That anyone could possibly give any credence to this sort of crap is laughable. 


Indeed.

What is an Aboriginal word for 'nation'?  There isn't one.
They refer to themselves as the mob.   
Mob: chiefly Australia : a flock, drove, or herd of animals


mob
Indigenous Australians might use ‘mob’ to refer to a group of Indigenous Australians associated with a particular place or country – their kin or family. This term isn’t generally appropriate for non-Indigenous Australians to use
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 48852
Gender: male
Re: First Nations?
Reply #32 - Jan 5th, 2025 at 3:57pm
 
Aquarius wrote on Jan 5th, 2025 at 2:54pm:
Aboriginals were never "nations" - they had no concept of such a thing.  They were simply a disparate number of nomadic tribes who had little contact with each other except in times of drought and floods when they fought over scarce resources of food and water. 

To call each of these small nomadic tribes a "nation," is the greatest misappropriation of any word in the English language ever known.  And they stole that idea of "nations" from the North American Indians because they haven't the ability to even contemplate such a thing themselves.

This is just another example of sociologists and Abo activists trying to rewrite history and present themselves as civilised.  Just another myth.   

That anyone could possibly give any credence to this sort of crap is laughable. 



Yep. I agree also. They were never a Nation, not even at tribal boundaries. A Mob is not a nation.
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 84853
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: First Nations?
Reply #33 - Jan 8th, 2025 at 11:15am
 
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Gnads
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 29742
Gender: male
Re: First Nations?
Reply #34 - Jan 8th, 2025 at 12:42pm
 
Back to top
 

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 84853
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: First Nations?
Reply #35 - Jan 8th, 2025 at 12:49pm
 
Primitive Tribalism - just like the Gazans et ilk - why will the IDF never eradicate Hamas?  Because the attitudes entrenched will remain and even under a different name the same thing will happen again and again.  They also want their payback - and it is 2025, people... not 625.

Someone else said that the IDF's only real answer was - genocide the lot as any hostile Arab nation/group would do if attacked, but Israel is civilised and still holds out hope for a decent government in Gaza despite the UN's idiotic stance and inability to do anything for real.

Same here - they just will not learn so are better with an isolated Homeland - a Two State Solution - far from those that they claim are afflicting them so badly.  Let them sort it all out there.

As far as the Intifada here goes - it is getting worse and the number of Towns Like Alice are growing in number daily, and still the ordinary people have no rights to self-defence or defence of family or property.  'They' are at war with us - we are not at war with them ..... so they have all the advantages at the moment.
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print