Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print
Dutton's Nuclear Bet Relies On Coal Plants (Read 719 times)
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17819
Gender: male
Re: Dutton's Nuclear Bet Relies On Coal Plants
Reply #45 - Jan 1st, 2025 at 4:21pm
 
Oh "potentials", "can"etc. No actual evidence. Consider this - The facilities are likely built on the same site as the coal plant. The coal plants should not have been built on top mine adits or drives, without a large engineered buffer. And adits and drives are engineered to withstand collapse. Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 58677
Here
Gender: male
Re: Dutton's Nuclear Bet Relies On Coal Plants
Reply #46 - Jan 1st, 2025 at 4:52pm
 
lee wrote on Jan 1st, 2025 at 4:21pm:
Oh "potentials", "can"etc. No actual evidence. Consider this - The facilities are likely built on the same site as the coal plant. The coal plants should not have been built on top mine adits or drives, without a large engineered buffer. And adits and drives are engineered to withstand collapse. Roll Eyes


Quote:
"potentials", "can"etc.


So its ok to build a nuclear plant on ground that as the potential to collapse or can subside ?

Yeah makes sense. The sell the land with warnings and the area is monitored. 

Just keep diggin that open cut hole you are working on.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17819
Gender: male
Re: Dutton's Nuclear Bet Relies On Coal Plants
Reply #47 - Jan 1st, 2025 at 5:27pm
 
Dnarever wrote on Jan 1st, 2025 at 4:52pm:
So its ok to build a nuclear plant on ground that as the potential to collapse or can subside ?


Sorry. I must be clearer. There is no danger from a mine collapsing or subsiding if the plant is away from the open pit. Capiche?

Dnarever wrote on Jan 1st, 2025 at 4:52pm:
Yeah makes sense. The sell the land with warnings and the area is monitored.


So what area around the open pit is monitored? 200 metres? one kilometre?

I went back to your reference. It is all in there,

...

So three times the depth of the pit from the "toe" to the "crest" and then one more depth width to the offset. So if the pit were one kilometre deep, the exclusion zone offset from the "Crest" would be 1 kilometre. Wink

It seems that 500m is the current batter depth.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jan 1st, 2025 at 5:37pm by lee »  
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 42035
Re: Dutton's Nuclear Bet Relies On Coal Plants
Reply #48 - Jan 8th, 2025 at 11:28am
 
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print