I recently came across a paper Jones et al 2023, which cites increased temperatures per Gt of GHG's.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-023-02041-1#Sec16
Excerpt - "According to our estimates, 2,471 Pg CO2 were emitted globally during 1851–2021 (Figs. 3, 4) leading to a CO2-induced increase in GMST of 1.11 °C (Fig. 5, Table 1)."
https://ourworldindata.org/co2-emissionsThe usual calculation is Warming vs Cumulative CO2 emissions in Gtonne. To convert Pg to Gt multiply by 10.
So having done the necessary calculations, we come to the following -
So dividing the temperature change by the CO2 emissions data -
1.11ºC/24710 or 0.000045ºC/Gt Globally.
Australia's emissions are of course smaller. In the order of 19.66Gt cumulative. So we multiply the global change per Gt by Australia's Cumulative emissions and we get 0.0008847ºC since 1850.
I didn't take out the start figure as it amounts to little more than a rounding error.
Now the fun part -
"The latest report from Net Zero Australia (University of Melbourne, the University of Queensland, Princeton University and management consultancies Nous and Evolved Energy) puts the cost at
$1.5 trillion by the end of the decade, with the need for $7 trillion to $9 trillion of capital by 2060 to meet Australia’s aspiration of net zero by 2050."
https://creinsurance.com.au/blog/the-9-trillion-solution-to-our-1-problem-austra...$60 trillion to reach "Net Zero" for about 9 ten thousandsth of a degree change.
Cheap innit?
Another study citing the IPCC said the change was .0008ºC/GT
.0008*19.6 or 0.01568ºC. Still cheap innit?