Australian Politics Forum - Coronavirus 1966 - paper trail, gain of function

aquascoot Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 34839 Gender:	Re: Coronavirus 1966 - paper trail, gain of function Reply #15 - Jan 8^th, 2025 at 8:03pm https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/immunisation/app/Pages/schedule.aspx side note no mention of covid vax
Back to top	IP Logged

Carl D

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 9571
Rivervale, Perth
Gender: male

Re: Coronavirus 1966 - paper trail, gain of function
Reply #16 - Jan 8^th, 2025 at 8:24pm

aquascoot wrote on Jan 8^th, 2025 at 8:03pm:

https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/immunisation/app/Pages/schedule.aspx

side note

no mention of covid vax Undecided

Why is that, I wonder?

Perhaps this might help?

From none other than the esteemed Dr. David Berger.

And Queensland did exactly the same thing at about the same time.

TL;DR (too long; didn't read): Governments are so determined to make everyone believe Covid has 'gone away' and are also too afraid to say the C word anymore that they won't even mention it in vaccination campaigns despite the fact that Covid is still about 10 times more deadly than the flu.

You're welcome.

Back to top

** Repeat Covid infections exercise our immune system in the same way that repeat concussions exercise our brain **

IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 34839
Gender: male

Re: Coronavirus 1966 - paper trail, gain of function
Reply #17 - Jan 8^th, 2025 at 8:41pm

Carl D wrote on Jan 8^th, 2025 at 8:24pm:

aquascoot wrote on Jan 8^th, 2025 at 8:03pm:

https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/immunisation/app/Pages/schedule.aspx

side note

no mention of covid vax Undecided

Why is that, I wonder?

Perhaps this might help?

From none other than the esteemed Dr. David Berger.

And Queensland did exactly the same thing at about the same time.

TL;DR (too long; didn't read): Governments are so determined to make everyone believe Covid has 'gone away' and are also too afraid to say the C word anymore that they won't even mention it in vaccination campaigns despite the fact that Covid is still about 10 times more deadly than the flu.

You're welcome.

hi carl

so covid is 10 x as deadly but the government arent pushing the vaccine

3 possibilities

1 the government want you to die

2 the government recognise the vaccine doesnt work

3 the government recognise the vaccine is dangerous and dont want to be sued

Wink

Back to top

IP Logged

Jovial Monk Gold Member Offline Dogs not cats! Posts: 47484 Gender:	Re: Coronavirus 1966 - paper trail, gain of function Reply #18 - Jan 10^th, 2025 at 7:15am God ’scoot is a moron! Maybe, just maybe, the governments state and federal want no mention of covid because otherwise the people might want more of an effort to eradicate it?
Back to top	Get the vaxx! 💉💉 If you don’t like abortions ignore them like you do school shootings. IP Logged

Carl D

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 9571
Rivervale, Perth
Gender: male

Re: Coronavirus 1966 - paper trail, gain of function
Reply #19 - Jan 10^th, 2025 at 8:23am

Out of aquascoot's "3 possibilities" only #1 is anywhere near being correct.

But, it's not that "the government want you to die". It's more like "the government doesn't care if you die". Especially the elderly and other "non productive economic units" (in their opinion).

And, if governments admitted Covid was airborne and still dangerous then people would demand something be done about it - clean air in workplaces and other buildings which would cost a lot of money. Governments and businesses don't want to do that.

Oh, except for themselves, of course (in Parliament House and World Economic Conferences, etc.).

Persisting with "droplet dogma" (Covid doesn't travel further than 1.5 meters when exhaled) for as long as they can saves governments and business a lot of money by shifting "public health" to "personal responsibility" and we've seen how well that's worked out so far... endless waves of Covid and more dead and constantly sick people.

This has been posted before but here's the video of former Tasmania Greens leader Cassy O'Connor questioning Premier Jeremy Rockliff about Covid.

You can see how uncomfortable Rockliff is. He even mentions "personal responsibility" (and Cassy replies with "it used to be called public health").

Another video where Cassy asks Disability Services Minister Jo Palmer about what protections the Tasmanian Government puts in place to protect vulnerable Tasmanians with disabilities.

Jo doesn't look very comfortable either... funny about that.

This comment says it all:

Quote:

@wendygreene3322
1 year ago
I love the fact that the govt reps will not look her straight in the eye. She's a real hero!

I'm betting nearly every single politician in Australia would have been uncomfortable if they'd been questioned about Australia's Covid response... especially after they decided to 'let it rip' and then take a 'vow of silence' regarding all things Covid.

Disgraceful stuff.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Jan 10^th, 2025 at 10:54am by Carl D »

** Repeat Covid infections exercise our immune system in the same way that repeat concussions exercise our brain **

IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 34839
Gender: male

Re: Coronavirus 1966 - paper trail, gain of function
Reply #20 - Jan 10^th, 2025 at 2:33pm

Carl D wrote on Jan 10^th, 2025 at 8:23am:

Out of aquascoot's "3 possibilities" only #1 is anywhere near being correct.

But, it's not that "the government want you to die". It's more like "the government doesn't care if you die". Especially the elderly and other "non productive economic units" (in their opinion).

And, if governments admitted Covid was airborne and still dangerous then people would demand something be done about it - clean air in workplaces and other buildings which would cost a lot of money. Governments and businesses don't want to do that.

Oh, except for themselves, of course (in Parliament House and World Economic Conferences, etc.).

Persisting with "droplet dogma" (Covid doesn't travel further than 1.5 meters when exhaled) for as long as they can saves governments and business a lot of money by shifting "public health" to "personal responsibility" and we've seen how well that's worked out so far... endless waves of Covid and more dead and constantly sick people.

This has been posted before but here's the video of former Tasmania Greens leader Cassy O'Connor questioning Premier Jeremy Rockliff about Covid.

You can see how uncomfortable Rockliff is. He even mentions "personal responsibility" (and Cassy replies with "it used to be called public health").

Another video where Cassy asks Disability Services Minister Jo Palmer about what protections the Tasmanian Government puts in place to protect vulnerable Tasmanians with disabilities.

Jo doesn't look very comfortable either... funny about that.

This comment says it all:

Quote:

@wendygreene3322
1 year ago
I love the fact that the govt reps will not look her straight in the eye. She's a real hero!

I'm betting nearly every single politician in Australia would have been uncomfortable if they'd been questioned about Australia's Covid response... especially after they decided to 'let it rip' and then take a 'vow of silence' regarding all things Covid.

Disgraceful stuff.

if youre a leaner , you probably find it disgraceful

i find 'personal responsibility" invigorating Wink

Back to top

IP Logged