lee wrote on Jan 21^st, 2025 at 12:32pm:


Excuse I? You think solar energy is good for hot water systems, do you?

We'll revise the question. How many people think solar energy is a scam?

<1 person please, Lee.

When you're done with that, I'd like to know which union is responsible for the LA fires.

Take your time.

aquascoot wrote on Jan 21^st, 2025 at 12:46pm:


Strange. I wasn't aware of Canberra doing drill baby drill, dear. How do you account for their 100% renewable energy? Does Donnie know they have wind at night?

Perhaps you should send him one of your emails. Might be worth Fed Exing him one of Mrs Scoot's lunchboxes too, dear.

Godspeed, Mr President.

lee wrote on Jan 21^st, 2025 at 1:26pm:


Er, hot water energy, I think, it's hard to say.

You may have changed your mind already.

SO UNFAIR !!!

Karnal wrote on Jan 21^st, 2025 at 12:59pm:


It is called playing computer games.  Canberra is still connected to the eastern states grid, meaning a mixture of fuel types. They just mean they have purchased enough nameplate capacity to notionally run their part of the grid.

"We’re phasing out fossil fuel energy by 2045. Canberra has already achieved a nation leading 100% renewable electricity supply. The next step in the ACT’s climate action journey is to electrify our homes, businesses and transport'

© 2025 All rights reserved

https://energy.act.gov.au/

Or this -

"Since 2020, 100% of electricity in the ACT has come from renewable sources. The ACT will maintain this from now on.

We aim to complete a transition away from the other major source of energy in the ACT – gas, by 2045."

https://www.climatechoices.act.gov.au/energy/what-the-act-government-is-doing

Or this

"October marks the date when the third stage of South Australia's Hornsdale wind farm comes online, from which the ACT has purchased the last trickle of renewable energy it needs to claim 100 per cent renewable power."
...
""We will be effectively there from October 1," Climate Change Minister Shane Rattenbury said."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-05-17/canberra-to-run-on-100-per-cent-renewable...


It all depends on definitions. 

Karnal wrote on Jan 21^st, 2025 at 9:02pm:

You suck.

Leave it at that. The rest is redundant.
Sydney Push. Say no more.

Karnal wrote on Jan 21^st, 2025 at 9:38pm:

You said it, sucker.
You suck. Literally.

Disgusting. Don't come near me, perv.

mothra wrote on Jan 14^th, 2025 at 5:47am:





"Any emotion, feeling, statement, or catchphrase is an acceptable answer to most of the problems in the new mathematics standards," a Common Core representative told reporters. "As long as students are being sincere, genuine, authentic, and true to themselves at the time they are answering the question, that's all we can ask as educators."

"Who are we to tell anyone that their own mathematical truth is wrong?" the rep added.

According to the rep, the Common Core standards will be updated next year to include feelings as acceptable responses to any and all questions pertaining to biology, chemistry, grammar, and history, while sources claim that English literature teachers have already been accepting emotions as responses for years.