Australian Politics Forum - Women in combat

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 138855
Gender: male

Re: Women in combat
Reply #60 - Jan 17^th, 2025 at 9:06pm

Karnal wrote on Jan 17^th, 2025 at 9:02pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2025 at 7:06pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 17^th, 2025 at 2:09pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2025 at 10:45am:

Completing a course and going into ACTUAL combat are two different things.

Any linky to American, Australian, British, French, Canadian lady soldiers shooting at the enemy on the ground and being shot at in return - ie IN COMBAT.

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img924/8547/9nh7DN.png

NLF woman in combat

A Brief History Of Women In Combat

There are numerous examples of women in combat ranging from the Vikings, through to the NLF in Vietnam and Eritrea to the Americans in Iraq and Afghanistan. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

You ARE a moron.

I highlighted why.

How the hell are YOU moderating Defence, having ZERO ****ing idea about anything to do with defence, the military or geopolitics.

You are an idiot out of your depth in every discussion. You have no idea, no words, no articulation. You are a moron with no redeeming features.

A complete kvvnt.

Says the old boy who slavishly supports Pete Hegseth for Defence Secretary.

YOU.

I'm guessing he's a Tulsi fan too.

"Donald Trump’s pick for director of national intelligence couldn’t clearly say what the director of national intelligence actually does, according to a new report in the Wall Street Journal.

"Meeting with Senate Republicans ahead of her confirmation hearings, Tulsi Gabbard, the former Democratic representative turned MAGA loyalist, failed to articulate what the job she’d been nominated for entails. She also didn’t know the difference between key surveillance powers, according to the report."

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 96333

Re: Women in combat
Reply #61 - Jan 17^th, 2025 at 9:22pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 17^th, 2025 at 9:06pm:

Karnal wrote on Jan 17^th, 2025 at 9:02pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2025 at 7:06pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 17^th, 2025 at 2:09pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2025 at 10:45am:

Completing a course and going into ACTUAL combat are two different things.

Any linky to American, Australian, British, French, Canadian lady soldiers shooting at the enemy on the ground and being shot at in return - ie IN COMBAT.

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img924/8547/9nh7DN.png

NLF woman in combat

A Brief History Of Women In Combat

There are numerous examples of women in combat ranging from the Vikings, through to the NLF in Vietnam and Eritrea to the Americans in Iraq and Afghanistan. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

You ARE a moron.

I highlighted why.

How the hell are YOU moderating Defence, having ZERO ****ing idea about anything to do with defence, the military or geopolitics.

You are an idiot out of your depth in every discussion. You have no idea, no words, no articulation. You are a moron with no redeeming features.

A complete kvvnt.

Says the old boy who slavishly supports Pete Hegseth for Defence Secretary.

YOU.

I'm guessing he's a Tulsi fan too.

"Donald Trump’s pick for director of national intelligence couldn’t clearly say what the director of national intelligence actually does, according to a new report in the Wall Street Journal.

"Meeting with Senate Republicans ahead of her confirmation hearings, Tulsi Gabbard, the former Democratic representative turned MAGA loyalist, failed to articulate what the job she’d been nominated for entails. She also didn’t know the difference between key surveillance powers, according to the report."

But of course! One in all in, innit.

The old boy's in deep. He 's most obedient. He offered to shave his own head for the lobotomy, poor thing.

This won't hurt a bit, they said. To this day, the old boy doesn't feel a thing at all.

He just convulses around, frothing at the mouth. Quite harmless, really.

A "cautionary tale", as SM likes to say.

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 47323
Gender: male

Re: Women in combat
Reply #62 - Jan 18^th, 2025 at 9:30am

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 17^th, 2025 at 9:06pm:

Karnal wrote on Jan 17^th, 2025 at 9:02pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2025 at 7:06pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 17^th, 2025 at 2:09pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2025 at 10:45am:

Completing a course and going into ACTUAL combat are two different things.

Any linky to American, Australian, British, French, Canadian lady soldiers shooting at the enemy on the ground and being shot at in return - ie IN COMBAT.

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img924/8547/9nh7DN.png

NLF woman in combat

A Brief History Of Women In Combat

There are numerous examples of women in combat ranging from the Vikings, through to the NLF in Vietnam and Eritrea to the Americans in Iraq and Afghanistan. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

You ARE a moron.

I highlighted why.

How the hell are YOU moderating Defence, having ZERO ****ing idea about anything to do with defence, the military or geopolitics.

You are an idiot out of your depth in every discussion. You have no idea, no words, no articulation. You are a moron with no redeeming features.

A complete kvvnt.

Says the old boy who slavishly supports Pete Hegseth for Defence Secretary.

YOU.

I'm guessing he's a Tulsi fan too.

"Donald Trump’s pick for director of national intelligence couldn’t clearly say what the director of national intelligence actually does, according to a new report in the Wall Street Journal.

"Meeting with Senate Republicans ahead of her confirmation hearings, Tulsi Gabbard, the former Democratic representative turned MAGA loyalist, failed to articulate what the job she’d been nominated for entails. She also didn’t know the difference between key surveillance powers, according to the report."

Silly distortion.

Biden lady DEI appointee for the SCOTUS didn't even know what a woman is. Still got confirmed.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Sir Eoin O Fada Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 2281 New England, NSW Gender:	Re: Women in combat Reply #63 - Jan 18^th, 2025 at 10:30am Re. Brian and Defence; he still doesn’t know the length of a WW1 bayonet.
Back to top	Self defence is a right. IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 47323
Gender: male

Re: Women in combat
Reply #64 - Jan 18^th, 2025 at 1:24pm

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 17^th, 2025 at 8:43pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2025 at 7:06pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 17^th, 2025 at 2:09pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2025 at 10:45am:

Completing a course and going into ACTUAL combat are two different things.

Any linky to American, Australian, British, French, Canadian lady soldiers shooting at the enemy on the ground and being shot at in return - ie IN COMBAT.

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img924/8547/9nh7DN.png

NLF woman in combat

A Brief History Of Women In Combat

There are numerous examples of women in combat ranging from the Vikings, through to the NLF in Vietnam and Eritrea to the Americans in Iraq and Afghanistan. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

You ARE a moron.

I highlighted why.

How the hell are YOU moderating Defence, having ZERO ****ing idea about anything to do with defence, the military or geopolitics.

You are an idiot out of your depth in every discussion. You have no idea, no words, no articulation. You are a moron with no redeeming features.

A complete kvvnt.

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img673/4087/gIlzsx.jpg

Maggie with parasol memes are no substitute for thought and articulation.
You are an idiiotic big girl's blouse, out of your depth in every discussion. You have no idea, no words, no articulation. You are an impaired moron with no redeeming features.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Brian Ross Gold Member Offline Representative of me Posts: 42236	Re: Women in combat Reply #65 - Jan 18^th, 2025 at 1:32pm
Back to top	Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... IP Logged

Frank Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 47323 Gender:	Re: Women in combat Reply #66 - Jan 18^th, 2025 at 1:34pm Brian Ross wrote on Jan 18^th, 2025 at 1:32pm: https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img673/4087/gIlzsx.jpg Oh, you had a new idea! No... wait... You haven't. Not in the last 30 years. As you were, Maggie.
Back to top	Estragon: I can’t go on like this. Vladimir: That’s what you think. IP Logged

Brian Ross Gold Member Offline Representative of me Posts: 42236	Re: Women in combat Reply #67 - Jan 18^th, 2025 at 1:36pm
Back to top	Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... IP Logged

Jasin

Gold Member

Online

Posts: 49179
Gender: male

Re: Women in combat
Reply #68 - Jan 18^th, 2025 at 3:31pm

It's been proven that women combatants who try to fight like Men both in mind and body are less effective than women combatants who fight like women in mind and body as the female strategy in warfare is different to the male one.

Also being seen in the Ukraine War and Gaza. That female combatants operating Drones are more calculating deceptive aspect that the male combatant victims don't see coming until it's too late.

Back to top

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.

IP Logged