Australian Politics Forum - Executive Orders……

KangAnon Gold Member Offline The Sandstorm is coming 🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵 Posts: 17854 Mianjin (Brisbane)	Re: Executive Orders…… Reply #60 - Jan 25^th, 2025 at 9:01pm Has anyone noticed, despite Trump's claims that he has nothing to do with Project 2025, how many of his EO directly align with the goals it sets out? I find that interesting, but not at all surprising.
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 139279
Gender: male

Re: Executive Orders……
Reply #61 - Jan 25^th, 2025 at 9:10pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 25^th, 2025 at 4:52pm:

SerialBrain9 wrote on Jan 25^th, 2025 at 4:31pm:

Greggy, you asked me what the intended purpose (origin) was for the 14th…

There is nothing in the 14th which mentions the intended purpose.

All I'm doing is quoting text directly from it:

"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

"Revoking this right would require amending the U.S. Constitution, or for the U.S. Supreme Court to diverge from centuries of established precedent and legal principles that date back to before the founding of this country."

Congress could pass a new constitutional amendment, but it would require a two-thirds vote in both the House and Senate and ratification by three-quarters of states.

Most legal scholars do not think that birthright citizenship can be revoked at all — let alone by executive order.

"It will be litigated immediately and its prospects of surviving those court fights are slim, even before a Supreme Court stacked with conservative justices and Trump appointees."

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 47755
Gender: male

Re: Executive Orders……
Reply #62 - Jan 25^th, 2025 at 9:12pm

KangAnon wrote on Jan 25^th, 2025 at 9:01pm:

Has anyone noticed, despite Trump's claims that he has nothing to do with Project 2025, how many of his EO directly align with the goals it sets out?

I find that interesting, but not at all surprising.

What IS wrong with the Project 2025, whatever it is, gabby grandpa.

Keep it concise.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 47755
Gender: male

Re: Executive Orders……
Reply #63 - Jan 25^th, 2025 at 9:15pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 25^th, 2025 at 9:10pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 25^th, 2025 at 4:52pm:

SerialBrain9 wrote on Jan 25^th, 2025 at 4:31pm:

Greggy, you asked me what the intended purpose (origin) was for the 14th…

There is nothing in the 14th which mentions the intended purpose.

All I'm doing is quoting text directly from it:

"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

"Revoking this right would require amending the U.S. Constitution, or for the U.S. Supreme Court to diverge from centuries of established precedent and legal principles that date back to before the founding of this country."

Congress could pass a new constitutional amendment, but it would require a two-thirds vote in both the House and Senate and ratification by three-quarters of states.

Most legal scholars do not think that birthright citizenship can be revoked at all — let alone by executive order.

"It will be litigated immediately and its prospects of surviving those court fights are slim, even before a Supreme Court stacked with conservative justices and Trump appointees."

Rue v Wade was overturned. On the very grounds of legislative and constitutional intention.

Legal intention is a thing, stupid, repulsive turd.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 139279
Gender: male

Re: Executive Orders……
Reply #64 - Jan 25^th, 2025 at 9:16pm

KangAnon wrote on Jan 25^th, 2025 at 9:01pm:

Has anyone noticed, despite Trump's claims that he has nothing to do with Project 2025, how many of his EO directly align with the goals it sets out?

I find that interesting, but not at all surprising.

I'm sure it's just a coincidence, or a simple misunderstanding.

I can't see why Trump would lie about such a thing, especially since there's no history of him telling lies.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 139279
Gender: male

Re: Executive Orders……
Reply #65 - Jan 25^th, 2025 at 9:19pm

Frank wrote on Jan 25^th, 2025 at 9:15pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 25^th, 2025 at 9:10pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 25^th, 2025 at 4:52pm:

SerialBrain9 wrote on Jan 25^th, 2025 at 4:31pm:

Greggy, you asked me what the intended purpose (origin) was for the 14th…

There is nothing in the 14th which mentions the intended purpose.

All I'm doing is quoting text directly from it:

"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

"Revoking this right would require amending the U.S. Constitution, or for the U.S. Supreme Court to diverge from centuries of established precedent and legal principles that date back to before the founding of this country."

Congress could pass a new constitutional amendment, but it would require a two-thirds vote in both the House and Senate and ratification by three-quarters of states.

Most legal scholars do not think that birthright citizenship can be revoked at all — let alone by executive order.

"It will be litigated immediately and its prospects of surviving those court fights are slim, even before a Supreme Court stacked with conservative justices and Trump appointees."

Rue v Wade was overturned. On the very grounds of legislative and constitutional intention.

Legal intention is a thing, stupid, repulsive turd.

You be sure to let us all know how it works out, Frank Wink

Back to top

IP Logged

KangAnon

Gold Member

Offline

The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 17854
Mianjin (Brisbane)

Re: Executive Orders……
Reply #66 - Jan 25^th, 2025 at 9:51pm

Frank wrote on Jan 25^th, 2025 at 9:12pm:

KangAnon wrote on Jan 25^th, 2025 at 9:01pm:

Has anyone noticed, despite Trump's claims that he has nothing to do with Project 2025, how many of his EO directly align with the goals it sets out?

I find that interesting, but not at all surprising.

What IS wrong with the Project 2025, whatever it is, gabby grandpa.

Keep it concise.

I really got under your skin didn't I champ...

I mean, when you ask so nicely, how can I refuse?

Well, it's pretty simple really, try using some manners if you'd like to even be considered for a good faith exchange.

Throw out triggered butthurt dickhead energy and you'll be treated like that.

Back to top

IP Logged

chimera

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 11915
Armidale
Gender: male

Re: Executive Orders……
Reply #67 - Jan 26^th, 2025 at 3:29am

Jasin wrote on Jan 25^th, 2025 at 3:33pm:

The Nerds infiltrate Govt Building: They at least had the balls to go up against a heavily armed Establishment at Capitol Hill and managed to only mess up the paperwork like an end of school muck up day. Some were killed by police at point blank.

You tell me Armchair Politician, which gets the bravery award?

The Bravery Award goes to the 9/11 martyrs at Trade Center New York. Also, bravery medal to Jap pilots at Pearl Harbor 1941. USA brings out the best.

Back to top

IP Logged