Frank wrote on Jan 24^th, 2025 at 12:37pm:


Every time, without fail, I offer you a good faith reply and you act like a dead set fuit.  Every, bloody time...

You really are a pathetic fu idiot.

Quote:


That’s your evidence?

So the entire crusade of fearmongering and moral panic, one that demands direct presidential intervention, hinges on selectively cited data from the UK, data that pertains solely to incarcerated individuals, not the general population, and a grand total of seven incidents of assault?

Twenty-seven women have publicly accused Donald Trump of sexual assault.

By your logic, that would make Trump nearly four times more of a risk to women than transgender women. Curious, isn’t it?

Shall we apply that same stellar logic to other societal issues, like, say, school shootings? Imagine the children we could protect, finally!  There have been 80+ school shootings, with multiple victims in 2024.  That's magnitudes more than 7, and many of those children were killed. 

Yet Trump does nothing.

Let’s be real for a moment: you’re not genuinely interested in protecting women or safety. This is about scapegoating a vulnerable minority. The so-called "evidence" you’ve dredged up exposes your bias, your prejudice, and your transparent hatred towards transgender people. You’ve clearly gone searching for something, anything,to rationalise that bigotry.

But here’s the thing: you’ll need to search harder. Because this? This is flimsy, selective, deeply dishonest and does more to expose your motives than justify your bullshit. Try again, because this is just:

Frank wrote on Jan 24^th, 2025 at 12:37pm:


Drop the charade. This is not about protecting women, it’s about fuelling bigotry.

SadKangaroo wrote on Jan 24^th, 2025 at 2:52pm:

Silly rubbish. Possibly evil, in parts.

You can't turn men into women or women into men.  Facilitating the mutilation of healthy bodies to make them conform to unhealthy minds is disgusting. Veiling it, disguising it in dishones language of 'caring about vulnerable minority and gender theory ' is dreadful. The venomous propoaganda of the trans activist towards real women ("terfs") is all you need to look at. The t trans activist are anything but 'vulnerable. They are aggresive misogynist perverts.

Karnal wrote on Jan 24^th, 2025 at 3:23pm:


Neither of you are capable of or willing to speak in good faith about most political or cultural matters. You both, together with gweggy turd, have long abandoned good faith in favour of being up to the minute with pwogwessive bien pensant, woke (née p.c.) bollocks. There is no new stupidity that you are not eagerly on board with.

Frank wrote on Jan 24^th, 2025 at 4:52pm:


Your response to my critique of your so-called "evidence", which, let’s be clear, was nothing short of utter nonsense, was not to substantiate your original claim that Trump was allegedly "protecting women."

Instead, you veered off course to focus on transgender individuals, whom you then had the audacity to describe as "disgusting."

Do you lack basic reading comprehension?

This entire debacle arose because a woman of faith had the courage to appeal to Trump for mercy, pleading with him to consider the humanity of those he is actively targeting. You and those like you then attacked this woman (so much for protecting women) and chose to heap scorn not just on her but also on the very people she sought to protect.

Your rants and increasingly desperate attempts to obscure your bigotry toward these people have failed spectacularly.

Yes, people, remember that.

SadKangaroo wrote on Jan 24^th, 2025 at 5:07pm:


Febrile nonsense, gabby grandpa.


There is no such thing as gender outside grammar. There are males and females. They are not transmutable.

It is no 'attack' on the mentally unwell/sick/perverted if you do not buy into their delusion/illness/perversion..

I am not accepting your dishonest, manipulative agit-prop language of 'mercy, pleading, targeting, faith, appeal, attack, heap scorn, protect, desperate, obscure' and the rest. You can lay on this emo garbage as thickly as is your gabby wont, but I am not going along with it, I do not accept it, I piss on it as manipulative rubbish that it is.

Shove it, grandpa.

Frank wrote on Jan 24^th, 2025 at 5:38pm:


White flag accepted.

If you can't even stand up to your own claims, I'll suggest the same solution I offered to Grap.

Go start a blog.

You can moderate the comments and filter out what you don't like.

You're already doing that in your replies by simply ignoring what people post and using it as a launchpad for an unrelated rant.

I think the safe space of a self moderated blog would suit you better. 

Your ideas won't need to stand up against the scrutiny of reality then.

Germany held onto the archaic western way and they became Nazis because of it.
France too, will hold onto the archaic way and it will fail like a Gay suicide for it.
Then it's down to Italy who will become MAFIA for its Roman past. Greece, will be like Nazis too.

All of them failing the colonisation game as they sacrifice their conies for their own self preservation in Europe.

Only Great Britain pays the ultimate price. It sacrifices itself on behalf of the success for its colonies.
That's why it's the TRUTH in politics.

Frank wrote on Jan 24^th, 2025 at 4:45pm:


What was that - Paki?

Give us a hissy. You know you want to.

There's ten rupees in it for you, dear boy.