Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print
Whaaaaa (Read 857 times)
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96412
Re: Whaaaaa
Reply #45 - Jan 24th, 2025 at 7:09pm
 
aquascoot wrote on Jan 24th, 2025 at 5:43pm:
Frank wrote on Jan 24th, 2025 at 5:38pm:
SadKangaroo wrote on Jan 24th, 2025 at 5:07pm:
Frank wrote on Jan 24th, 2025 at 4:52pm:
SadKangaroo wrote on Jan 24th, 2025 at 4:42pm:
Frank wrote on Jan 24th, 2025 at 4:40pm:
Silly rubbish. Possibly evil, in parts.

You can't turn men into women or women into men.  Facilitating the mutilation of healthy bodies to make them conform to unhealthy minds is disgusting. Veiling it, disguising it in dishones language of 'caring about vulnerable minority and gender theory ' is dreadful. The venomous propaganda of the trans activist towards real women ("terfs") is all you need to look at. The trans activist are anything but 'vulnerable. They are aggresive misogynist perverts.


So your issue isn't women's safety after all.

Thank you for the accidental admission and honesty.

How the he'll do you figure that, gabby grandpa?

Not buying into your lying, misleading language is admission of anything now?  Siding with women who also do not buy your trans prooaganda is now admission?


You mongs have this idiotic mental tick of talking about admission and white flags when your agit-prop is rejected and your premises and chains of thought are shown to be stupid or dishonest, often both.


Your response to my critique of your so-called "evidence", which, let’s be clear, was nothing short of utter nonsense, was not to substantiate your original claim that Trump was allegedly "protecting women."

Instead, you veered off course to focus on transgender individuals, whom you then had the audacity to describe as "disgusting."

Do you lack basic reading comprehension?

This entire debacle arose because a woman of faith had the courage to appeal to Trump for mercy, pleading with him to consider the humanity of those he is actively targeting. You and those like you then attacked this woman (so much for protecting women) and chose to heap scorn not just on her but also on the very people she sought to protect.

Your rants and increasingly desperate attempts to obscure your bigotry toward these people have failed spectacularly.

Yes, people, remember that.


Febrile nonsense, gabby grandpa.


There is no such thing as gender outside grammar. There are males and females. They are not transmutable.

It is no 'attack' on the mentally unwell/sick/perverted if you do not buy into their delusion/illness/perversion..

I am not accepting your dishonest, manipulative agit-prop language of 'mercy, pleading, targeting, faith, appeal, attack, heap scorn, protect, desperate, obscure' and the rest. You can lay on this emo garbage as thickly as is your gabby wont, but I am not going along with it, I do not accept it, I piss on it as manipulative rubbish that it is.

Shove it, grandpa.








since when did the left start taking their direction from ' a woman of faith'?
only on the rare occasion it suits their sooking  Wink


Loves banging on about "the left", doesn't he?

Here's what John Bolton has to say.



RINO !!!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96412
Re: Whaaaaa
Reply #46 - Jan 24th, 2025 at 7:20pm
 
Frank wrote on Jan 24th, 2025 at 5:38pm:
SadKangaroo wrote on Jan 24th, 2025 at 5:07pm:
Frank wrote on Jan 24th, 2025 at 4:52pm:
SadKangaroo wrote on Jan 24th, 2025 at 4:42pm:
Frank wrote on Jan 24th, 2025 at 4:40pm:
Silly rubbish. Possibly evil, in parts.

You can't turn men into women or women into men.  Facilitating the mutilation of healthy bodies to make them conform to unhealthy minds is disgusting. Veiling it, disguising it in dishones language of 'caring about vulnerable minority and gender theory ' is dreadful. The venomous propaganda of the trans activist towards real women ("terfs") is all you need to look at. The trans activist are anything but 'vulnerable. They are aggresive misogynist perverts.


So your issue isn't women's safety after all.

Thank you for the accidental admission and honesty.

How the he'll do you figure that, gabby grandpa?

Not buying into your lying, misleading language is admission of anything now?  Siding with women who also do not buy your trans prooaganda is now admission?


You mongs have this idiotic mental tick of talking about admission and white flags when your agit-prop is rejected and your premises and chains of thought are shown to be stupid or dishonest, often both.


Your response to my critique of your so-called "evidence", which, let’s be clear, was nothing short of utter nonsense, was not to substantiate your original claim that Trump was allegedly "protecting women."

Instead, you veered off course to focus on transgender individuals, whom you then had the audacity to describe as "disgusting."

Do you lack basic reading comprehension?

This entire debacle arose because a woman of faith had the courage to appeal to Trump for mercy, pleading with him to consider the humanity of those he is actively targeting. You and those like you then attacked this woman (so much for protecting women) and chose to heap scorn not just on her but also on the very people she sought to protect.

Your rants and increasingly desperate attempts to obscure your bigotry toward these people have failed spectacularly.

Yes, people, remember that.


Febrile nonsense, gabby grandpa.


There is no such thing as gender outside grammar. There are males and females. They are not transmutable.

It is no 'attack' on the mentally unwell/sick/perverted if you do not buy into their delusion/illness/perversion..

I am not accepting your dishonest, manipulative agit-prop language of 'mercy, pleading, targeting, faith, appeal, attack, heap scorn, protect, desperate, obscure' and the rest. You can lay on this emo garbage as thickly as is your gabby wont, but I am not going along with it, I do not accept it, I piss on it as manipulative rubbish that it is.

Shove it, grandpa.







Told you. When he's not having a meltdown, he's throwing out this one, feigning some sort of well considered, intellectual counterpoint to your dastardly agit prop pwemise.

Race?

Disagwees with the very pwemise.

Class?

Disagwees with the very pwemise.

Gender?

How rude. He disagwees, of course.

Not sure why you'd want to try good faith with this. You might as well be speaking Swahili.

I believe the old boy has an ontological aversion to that as well

They're tinted.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 47592
Gender: male
Re: Whaaaaa
Reply #47 - Jan 24th, 2025 at 8:56pm
 
Karnal wrote on Jan 24th, 2025 at 7:20pm:
Frank wrote on Jan 24th, 2025 at 5:38pm:
SadKangaroo wrote on Jan 24th, 2025 at 5:07pm:
Frank wrote on Jan 24th, 2025 at 4:52pm:
SadKangaroo wrote on Jan 24th, 2025 at 4:42pm:
Frank wrote on Jan 24th, 2025 at 4:40pm:
Silly rubbish. Possibly evil, in parts.

You can't turn men into women or women into men.  Facilitating the mutilation of healthy bodies to make them conform to unhealthy minds is disgusting. Veiling it, disguising it in dishones language of 'caring about vulnerable minority and gender theory ' is dreadful. The venomous propaganda of the trans activist towards real women ("terfs") is all you need to look at. The trans activist are anything but 'vulnerable. They are aggresive misogynist perverts.


So your issue isn't women's safety after all.

Thank you for the accidental admission and honesty.

How the he'll do you figure that, gabby grandpa?

Not buying into your lying, misleading language is admission of anything now?  Siding with women who also do not buy your trans prooaganda is now admission?


You mongs have this idiotic mental tick of talking about admission and white flags when your agit-prop is rejected and your premises and chains of thought are shown to be stupid or dishonest, often both.


Your response to my critique of your so-called "evidence", which, let’s be clear, was nothing short of utter nonsense, was not to substantiate your original claim that Trump was allegedly "protecting women."

Instead, you veered off course to focus on transgender individuals, whom you then had the audacity to describe as "disgusting."

Do you lack basic reading comprehension?

This entire debacle arose because a woman of faith had the courage to appeal to Trump for mercy, pleading with him to consider the humanity of those he is actively targeting. You and those like you then attacked this woman (so much for protecting women) and chose to heap scorn not just on her but also on the very people she sought to protect.

Your rants and increasingly desperate attempts to obscure your bigotry toward these people have failed spectacularly.

Yes, people, remember that.


Febrile nonsense, gabby grandpa.


There is no such thing as gender outside grammar. There are males and females. They are not transmutable.

It is no 'attack' on the mentally unwell/sick/perverted if you do not buy into their delusion/illness/perversion..

I am not accepting your dishonest, manipulative agit-prop language of 'mercy, pleading, targeting, faith, appeal, attack, heap scorn, protect, desperate, obscure' and the rest. You can lay on this emo garbage as thickly as is your gabby wont, but I am not going along with it, I do not accept it, I piss on it as manipulative rubbish that it is.

Shove it, grandpa.







Told you. When he's not having a meltdown, he's throwing out this one, feigning some sort of well considered, intellectual counterpoint to your dastardly agit prop pwemise.

Race?

Disagwees with the very pwemise.

Class?

Disagwees with the very pwemise.

Gender?

How rude. He disagwees, of course.

Not sure why you'd want to try good faith with this. You might as well be speaking Swahili.

I believe the old boy has an ontological aversion to that as well

They're tinted.

Could be worse - could be clapped out Sydney Push pakis...
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
chimera
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11889
Armidale
Gender: male
Re: Whaaaaa
Reply #48 - Jan 25th, 2025 at 2:54am
 
Jasin wrote on Jan 24th, 2025 at 7:04pm:
...by then, the people of America  will realise the truth and give Great Britain it's new home where it should have been all along.

'Great?' Navies generally give the length of warships but not UK with its 2 aircraft carriers.
'The vessels will be utilised by all three branches of the UK Armed Forces and will provide eight acres of sovereign territory.'
8 acres of Empire.
8.


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 47592
Gender: male
Re: Whaaaaa
Reply #49 - Jan 25th, 2025 at 7:54am
 
Gordon wrote on Jan 22nd, 2025 at 9:03pm:
This whaaaa fest is even better than the last

https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS6pRhm4C/

...



https://x.com/jims703/status/1881832718813794307  Grin Grin
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96412
Re: Whaaaaa
Reply #50 - Jan 25th, 2025 at 1:52pm
 
Frank wrote on Jan 25th, 2025 at 7:54am:


Watch out, Bobby. Frank's taking over your job.

He's in the advanced lobotomy stage too, dear.

He'll need some help changing his nappies if anyone's up for it.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 106480
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Whaaaaa
Reply #51 - Jan 25th, 2025 at 1:56pm
 
Karnal wrote on Jan 25th, 2025 at 1:52pm:
Frank wrote on Jan 25th, 2025 at 7:54am:


Watch out, Bobby. Frank's taking over your job.

He's in the advanced lobotomy stage too, dear.

He'll need some help changing his nappies if anyone's up for it.



Trump is cleaning the place up.
he knows what to do:

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1737751002/15#28
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 49403
Gender: male
Re: Whaaaaa
Reply #52 - Jan 25th, 2025 at 2:03pm
 
chimera wrote on Jan 25th, 2025 at 2:54am:
Jasin wrote on Jan 24th, 2025 at 7:04pm:
...by then, the people of America  will realise the truth and give Great Britain it's new home where it should have been all along.

'Great?' Navies generally give the length of warships but not UK with its 2 aircraft carriers.
'The vessels will be utilised by all three branches of the UK Armed Forces and will provide eight acres of sovereign territory.'
8 acres of Empire.
8.





I said nothing about the UK - United Kingdom of Royalty in Music, Media and Entertainment.
That side will grovel to mainland Europe and Eurovision contests.
I'm talking about the political, military, religious RIGHT of the country that is GREAT BRITAIN.

If none of you can tell the difference between these two, you ain't got nothing to offer the discussion right from the very start.

Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
chimera
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11889
Armidale
Gender: male
Re: Whaaaaa
Reply #53 - Jan 25th, 2025 at 2:55pm
 
Jasin wrote on Jan 25th, 2025 at 2:03pm:
I'm talking about the political, military, religious RIGHT of the country that is GREAT BRITAIN.

So am I.  It was right to take 1/4 of the planet. If it didn't then who else would do the job?  Might is right, power is from guns and the gods are English.  It owns Americas including all the Spanish bits (not Brazil, that's a Portuguese ally). Somehow it lost it all but has 8 acres of airfields to rule the waves.  The British land territory belongs on the Mississippi, in the midday sun with mad dogs.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print