.                 .                                                       .                                                          

  <

                                                                     

<>                       >o<

Quote:



this is something yadda appears to have always struggled with.

philperth2010 wrote on Jan 25^th, 2025 at 8:18am:


Bravo, Phil.
Up to your ghost writer’s usual standards.

SCENARIO #1
If some person [or group of persons] wishes to insist [while contradicting apparent REALITY],
that a man is [or can be] a woman,
then if they wish to believe that [inside their own head], then i can tolerate that 'reality'.

Because in that 'reality', their insistence does not effect [impose itself upon] MY REALITY.

[e.g.    Maybe that person is writing a science fiction novel ?]


SCENARIO #2
But if that same person [or group of persons] is now going to insist,
that everyone else [i.e. every     other person/individual     who they encounter socially],
must ALSO believe that [i.e. must 'act as though'] a man is [or can be] a woman,
then my rebuttal would be,
that you have no right, to TRY TO [socially] IMPOSE such a REALITY, as a belief system, upon me, or upon anyone else.


IMO....
Like every rational individual, my own understanding of   >> apparent REALITY <<   has been formed from my own experiences - in this life.

IMO....
How we each perceive 'the' REALITY that 'we find' in our 'environs', is our own business [....so long as in that experience,
the individual is not   directly seeking   to physically or mentally, injure someone else].


But i would argue, that if another individual [or group] is going to insist that
I MUST ACCEPT   AND   OPENLY ACKNOWLEDGE
a reality which contradicts my own senses and perception
then my opinion is that person would be ACTIVELY SEEKING to bring, AND TO IMPOSE,
a new and unwelcome   mental stress   upon myself [and upon others].


QUESTION;
Why would any constituted government [or any rationally thinking group of MEN] ever......believe that,
bringing, AND IMPOSING, a new, and unwelcome mental stress upon myself [and upon a whole society of men] could be a lawful and rational act ?

i.e.
They would seek......to IMPOSE upon us, a new, and unwelcome mental stressor.....THE BASIS OF WHICH, ACTUALLY
contradicts apparent REALITY.


apparent = = readily perceived or understood; obvious.

i.e.
In MY OWN REALITY,       i know and understand,
that a man [i.e. an individual in 'possession' of a penis,
and who is also in possession of XY chromosomes......is not a woman].

He, is a man, and not a woman [.......NO MATTER WHAT IS 'GOING ON' INSIDE THE HEAD,
OF AN INDIVIDUAL WHO INSISTS......THAT THE OPPOSITE, IS 'THE' REALITY !!].

philperth2010 wrote on Jan 25^th, 2025 at 8:18am:



You miss the point, as if on purpose.  You can't be that stupid, surely. It must be on purpose, deliberate deformation of what the point IS.

Doing a bit of genealogical research and on some sites they have,

Father’s sex : male.

and

Mothers sex : female

Just so there’s no confusion, I guess.
Historically speaking there appears to be no confusion.
Even back in Egyptian times the mothers were females.