Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print
First Nuclear Power Plant Has Official Start Date (Read 1070 times)
RussiAnVetEraN
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Stunned

Posts: 565
Zelenograd
Gender: male
Re: First Nuclear Power Plant Has Official Start Date
Reply #45 - Feb 3rd, 2025 at 11:30pm
 
Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Feb 3rd, 2025 at 8:19pm:
RussiAnVetEraN wrote on Feb 3rd, 2025 at 5:47pm:
Frank wrote on Feb 3rd, 2025 at 9:19am:
The Chinese, Russians, Iranians and others already make huge trouble in Western societies through their manipulation of social media. Russian intelligence was highly active in propelling early iterations of Black Lives Matter.


I would be interested to see evidence for these claims someday.


What makes you think such evidence is available outside The Shadow Governments of this world?


Then why talk about something you have no evidence of?  Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Nevermore!
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Deep State Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 85634
Always was always will be HOME
Gender: male
Re: First Nuclear Power Plant Has Official Start Date
Reply #46 - Feb 4th, 2025 at 8:53am
 
RussiAnVetEraN wrote on Feb 3rd, 2025 at 11:30pm:
Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Feb 3rd, 2025 at 8:19pm:
RussiAnVetEraN wrote on Feb 3rd, 2025 at 5:47pm:
Frank wrote on Feb 3rd, 2025 at 9:19am:
The Chinese, Russians, Iranians and others already make huge trouble in Western societies through their manipulation of social media. Russian intelligence was highly active in propelling early iterations of Black Lives Matter.


I would be interested to see evidence for these claims someday.


What makes you think such evidence is available outside The Shadow Governments of this world?


Then why talk about something you have no evidence of?  Roll Eyes


That, grasshopper, is the secret.... everyone talks about it but has no evidence... why are YOU discussing it without evidence?  See?  My point is proven... besides - I was talking around it - not about it.... I didn't say one way or another about the Chinese, Russians and Iranis.... but is seems highly likely given their rampant Westophobia...

My first is a generalised comment of the issue, not on it - the second is a statement of possible affirmation of the scenario...
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 18117
Gender: male
Re: First Nuclear Power Plant Has Official Start Date
Reply #47 - Feb 4th, 2025 at 6:21pm
 
freediver wrote on Feb 3rd, 2025 at 9:44pm:
Does your "further reading" contradict anything in the wikipedia article, or does it just confuse you?


Yes the costs involved. So  many assumptions, so few data points, other than "moderate" costing analysis. Wink

But you seem confused. You didn't know about CRP, how it was used, how it was calculated and the time period.

Now in the main article also assumptions and the costs particularly for Australia, which somehow didn't raise your eyebrows. Perhaps you don't have any, all that natural radiation. Wink
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49574
At my desk.
Re: First Nuclear Power Plant Has Official Start Date
Reply #48 - Feb 5th, 2025 at 9:36am
 
lee wrote on Feb 4th, 2025 at 6:21pm:
freediver wrote on Feb 3rd, 2025 at 9:44pm:
Does your "further reading" contradict anything in the wikipedia article, or does it just confuse you?


Yes the costs involved.


So why did you highlight your concerns about CO2 emissions from battery storage facilities associated with renewable energy?

Quote:
You didn't know about CRP,


I said you have no idea what it means. Just going by your feeble explanation.

...
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Belgarion
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5492
Gender: male
Re: First Nuclear Power Plant Has Official Start Date
Reply #49 - Feb 5th, 2025 at 9:56am
 
freediver wrote on Feb 2nd, 2025 at 9:44am:
Quote:
The technology and spent fuel management systems are already there


Can you explain these "spent fuel management systems"?


All you need to know right here.

https://www.nrc.gov/waste/spent-fuel-storage.html

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/nuclear-fuel-storage

These are just some of the references on this subject.
Back to top
 

"I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

Voltaire.....(possibly)
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49574
At my desk.
Re: First Nuclear Power Plant Has Official Start Date
Reply #50 - Feb 5th, 2025 at 11:19am
 
Belgarion wrote on Feb 5th, 2025 at 9:56am:
freediver wrote on Feb 2nd, 2025 at 9:44am:
Quote:
The technology and spent fuel management systems are already there


Can you explain these "spent fuel management systems"?


All you need to know right here.

https://www.nrc.gov/waste/spent-fuel-storage.html

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/nuclear-fuel-storage

These are just some of the references on this subject.


So you have no idea what your links say?

What estimate do they give for the cost of storing the radioactive waste until it is safe, and what method do they propose?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Belgarion
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5492
Gender: male
Re: First Nuclear Power Plant Has Official Start Date
Reply #51 - Feb 5th, 2025 at 12:09pm
 
freediver wrote on Feb 5th, 2025 at 11:19am:
Belgarion wrote on Feb 5th, 2025 at 9:56am:
freediver wrote on Feb 2nd, 2025 at 9:44am:
Quote:
The technology and spent fuel management systems are already there


Can you explain these "spent fuel management systems"?


All you need to know right here.

https://www.nrc.gov/waste/spent-fuel-storage.html

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/nuclear-fuel-storage

These are just some of the references on this subject.


So you have no idea what your links say?

What estimate do they give for the cost of storing the radioactive waste until it is safe, and what method do they propose?


Unlike you anti nuclear Luddites, I read and understand the references I post. The first link has numerous references that will answer your questions, however to make it easy for you I will post another that addresses this question, which BTW, you did not ask in your original post. 
https://www.iaea.org/publications/8123/costing-of-spent-fuel-storage
Back to top
 

"I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

Voltaire.....(possibly)
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49574
At my desk.
Re: First Nuclear Power Plant Has Official Start Date
Reply #52 - Feb 5th, 2025 at 12:14pm
 
Belgarion wrote on Feb 5th, 2025 at 12:09pm:
freediver wrote on Feb 5th, 2025 at 11:19am:
Belgarion wrote on Feb 5th, 2025 at 9:56am:
freediver wrote on Feb 2nd, 2025 at 9:44am:
Quote:
The technology and spent fuel management systems are already there


Can you explain these "spent fuel management systems"?


All you need to know right here.

https://www.nrc.gov/waste/spent-fuel-storage.html

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/nuclear-fuel-storage

These are just some of the references on this subject.


So you have no idea what your links say?

What estimate do they give for the cost of storing the radioactive waste until it is safe, and what method do they propose?


Unlike you anti nuclear Luddites, I read and understand the references I post. The first link has numerous references that will answer your questions, however to make it easy for you I will post another that addresses this question, which BTW, you did not ask in your original post. 
https://www.iaea.org/publications/8123/costing-of-spent-fuel-storage


So how much does does it cost, and what method does it recommend?

Or do you still have no idea what your own links say?

They must be pretty special documents if they can have you convince yourself you understand the problem at the same time as rendering you incapable of answering the simplest questions.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 75406
Gender: male
Re: First Nuclear Power Plant Has Official Start Date
Reply #53 - Feb 5th, 2025 at 12:29pm
 
Belgarion wrote on Feb 1st, 2025 at 7:32pm:
Not to the same extent they are occurring now.


A decade plus of the liberal govt having zero direction or policy will do that
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Belgarion
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5492
Gender: male
Re: First Nuclear Power Plant Has Official Start Date
Reply #54 - Feb 5th, 2025 at 5:49pm
 
freediver wrote on Feb 5th, 2025 at 12:14pm:
Belgarion wrote on Feb 5th, 2025 at 12:09pm:
freediver wrote on Feb 5th, 2025 at 11:19am:
Belgarion wrote on Feb 5th, 2025 at 9:56am:
freediver wrote on Feb 2nd, 2025 at 9:44am:
Quote:
The technology and spent fuel management systems are already there


Can you explain these "spent fuel management systems"?


All you need to know right here.

https://www.nrc.gov/waste/spent-fuel-storage.html

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/nuclear-fuel-storage

These are just some of the references on this subject.


So you have no idea what your links say?

What estimate do they give for the cost of storing the radioactive waste until it is safe, and what method do they propose?


Unlike you anti nuclear Luddites, I read and understand the references I post. The first link has numerous references that will answer your questions, however to make it easy for you I will post another that addresses this question, which BTW, you did not ask in your original post. 
https://www.iaea.org/publications/8123/costing-of-spent-fuel-storage


So how much does does it cost, and what method does it recommend?

Or do you still have no idea what your own links say?

They must be pretty special documents if they can have you convince yourself you understand the problem at the same time as rendering you incapable of answering the simplest questions.


The answers are there for those with the ability to comprehend them. sadly this does not seem to be you.
Back to top
 

"I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

Voltaire.....(possibly)
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49574
At my desk.
Re: First Nuclear Power Plant Has Official Start Date
Reply #55 - Feb 5th, 2025 at 6:58pm
 
Belgarion wrote on Feb 5th, 2025 at 5:49pm:
freediver wrote on Feb 5th, 2025 at 12:14pm:
Belgarion wrote on Feb 5th, 2025 at 12:09pm:
freediver wrote on Feb 5th, 2025 at 11:19am:
Belgarion wrote on Feb 5th, 2025 at 9:56am:
freediver wrote on Feb 2nd, 2025 at 9:44am:
Quote:
The technology and spent fuel management systems are already there


Can you explain these "spent fuel management systems"?


All you need to know right here.

https://www.nrc.gov/waste/spent-fuel-storage.html

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/nuclear-fuel-storage

These are just some of the references on this subject.


So you have no idea what your links say?

What estimate do they give for the cost of storing the radioactive waste until it is safe, and what method do they propose?


Unlike you anti nuclear Luddites, I read and understand the references I post. The first link has numerous references that will answer your questions, however to make it easy for you I will post another that addresses this question, which BTW, you did not ask in your original post. 
https://www.iaea.org/publications/8123/costing-of-spent-fuel-storage


So how much does does it cost, and what method does it recommend?

Or do you still have no idea what your own links say?

They must be pretty special documents if they can have you convince yourself you understand the problem at the same time as rendering you incapable of answering the simplest questions.


The answers are there for those with the ability to comprehend them. sadly this does not seem to be you.


Grin

You haven't even read them have you? That's why you do not realise they support my argument.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 18117
Gender: male
Re: First Nuclear Power Plant Has Official Start Date
Reply #56 - Feb 5th, 2025 at 9:34pm
 
freediver wrote on Feb 5th, 2025 at 9:36am:
So why did you highlight your concerns about CO2 emissions from battery storage facilities associated with renewable energy?


So now you reckon  CO2 emissions are not a cost. Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

CO2 doesn't count, especially if we have a carbon tax. Roll Eyes

freediver wrote on Feb 5th, 2025 at 9:36am:
I said you have no idea what it means. Just going by your feeble explanation.


So you still don't understand. Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin


[url]https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/af/20201019_Levelized_Cos
t_of_Energy_%28LCOE%2C_Lazard%29_-_renewable_energy.svg/1920px-20201019_Levelize
d_Cost_of_Energy_%28LCOE%2C_Lazard%29_-_renewable_energy.svg.png
[/url]

So it doesn't matter what are included or excluded in your "levelized" costs. Only those wiki ascribes to count. Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49574
At my desk.
Re: First Nuclear Power Plant Has Official Start Date
Reply #57 - Feb 6th, 2025 at 7:16am
 
Quote:
So it doesn't matter what are included or excluded in your "levelized" costs. Only those wiki ascribes to count.


If you can make a coherent argument about it go ahead. If all you can do is google something you do not understand and demand we explain it to you, then don't bother.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Grappler Deep State Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 85634
Always was always will be HOME
Gender: male
Re: First Nuclear Power Plant Has Official Start Date
Reply #58 - Feb 6th, 2025 at 8:29am
 
I get the feeling nuclear is a foregone conclusion... compared to miles and miles of monstrosities in the form of towers and windmills and such, it is much more scenonautically 'clean' despite the reality that dumping in the old deep mine shafts in  Neunig Territory 'out there' might have to be used instead of as penetrating rods in armour piercing shells - for 'storage' ...

There is already a 'greenie movement' to prevent the scenery abuse in the Nullarbor.... such things breed strange bed-fellows...

It's a funny thing in the polls - some give 30% in support - others 60% odd in support - but of course, all say that not many will want to pay more for nuclear .. but that posed as a stand-alone question does not give the full picture.. they also won't want to pay more for windmills or panels... the Guardian pontificates that 'support for nuclear will vanish' at the next election.... but I'm not so sure.

Got a phone survey t'other day ... last question was about support for nuclear... main thrust was the Nationals  - now let me be fair - I'm happy enough with our local lady National member at State level - not so with the Federeal, who's leaving anyway and is to be replaced by another dark horse while Barnaby remains the darkest horse in the race.... and I vote Indies (use the whip, Indy!) .... and I doubt any major party or Coalition will attract my vote this time around (again) ... but I'm still weighing up the ideas of masses of towers etc v nuclear .......

Convince me................ jeez - someone said they could convert some of the used-up coal stations to nuclear facilities.... I see Liddell and Wallerawang on the maps.... maybe even on Lake Macquarie down south... they're already wrecking the South Western side of The Lake with over-development .... I understand there are glowing reports of the possibilities there - after the stations were 'wound down' and sold off to mates.... (hello again!! - you know where to invest your dollars, right?).. RIGHT???
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 18117
Gender: male
Re: First Nuclear Power Plant Has Official Start Date
Reply #59 - Feb 6th, 2025 at 11:14am
 
freediver wrote on Feb 6th, 2025 at 7:16am:
If you can make a coherent argument about it go ahead.



Poor petal. Already done. You just don't have the wherewithal. Grin Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print