Frank wrote on Feb 13
th, 2025 at 8:18pm:
KangAnon wrote on Feb 13
th, 2025 at 2:33pm:
Frank wrote on Feb 13
th, 2025 at 8:50am:
Karnal wrote on Feb 12
th, 2025 at 11:08pm:
Baronvonrort wrote on Feb 12
th, 2025 at 9:53pm:
Leroy wrote on Feb 12
th, 2025 at 9:44pm:
Baronvonrort wrote on Feb 12
th, 2025 at 9:39pm:
Biden ignored the Supreme court with cutting student debt were there any consequences?
Sad thing is the dems are going to waste millions in court trying to hamstring the president the people voted in. Even if they win in court at the taxpayers expense it will also prevent the taxpayers from getting the benefits of the changes.
Sad all round, the left have just lost the plot.
The DOJ aren't likely to prosecute a sitting president.
The democrats don't have the numbers to impeach.
The first court case locking Trumps team and treasury secretary out of treasury is unconstitutional.
The judge will get slapped down by SCOTUS.
Who gets to decide policy in the US?
Is it the President who campaigned with this won house senate and popular vote.
Is it some
unelected bureacrat with an activist judge
Baron missed the first name in the thread title.
Easy to miss. South African billionaires are rather forgettable, aren't they?
Musk is AUTHORISED by Trump, paki.
authorise,
verbgive official permission for or approval to an undertaking or agent.
Musk and Trump still have to work within the Constitution and the Law.
It's literally in black and white. Rule of law? I thought that was important?
Not anymore?
They are working lawfully.
What laws have been broken?
Executive orders are directives from the President that manage operations within the federal government. However, they cannot override existing laws or directly grant private individuals or companies (like Elon Musk or DOGE) access to sensitive government data unless explicitly authorised by Congress or under statutory authority.
Fourth Amendment (Unreasonable Searches & Seizures): If an EO is being used to force access to private taxpayer information held by the IRS or Treasury, this would likely violate privacy protections under the Fourth Amendment, as well as 26 U.S. Code § 6103, which makes IRS records confidential except under specific legal provisions.
Separation of Powers: Congress, not the President, has the constitutional power over taxation and appropriations (Article I, Section 8). While executive agencies administer these laws, an EO cannot lawfully circumvent existing restrictions on data access without legislation.
If Musk or DOGE are accessing government-held financial data under an EO without proper statutory backing, it could be challenged in court as an unconstitutional overreach.
Which the federal court so far agrees with.
USAID is primarily funded through appropriations bills passed by Congress, meaning that its budget and expenditures are legally mandated. Once Congress authorises and appropriates funding:
Impoundment Control Act (1974): The President cannot unilaterally refuse to spend funds that Congress has authorised, except under very narrow conditions (such as national security emergencies).
Separation of Powers: The President cannot override congressional spending decisions simply through an EO. Any attempt to block USAID funding without legal justification would likely be struck down as unconstitutional.
If Musk or DOGE (or any private actors) are interfering in this process, that would likely be illegal unless they are acting within an agency under specific delegated authority. Even then, it would face legal challenges.
If Musk or DOGE are accessing IRS, Treasury, or other government data under an EO without congressional authority, it is likely unconstitutional and unlawful.
The President cannot stop USAID from spending congressionally approved funds through an EO unless they have a legal basis (such as national security concerns or legislative loopholes).
Any such actions could face lawsuits and injunctions in federal court and have. Trump and Elon have ignored those court rulings.
That is a huge problem.