Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
The Promises That Could Determine Next Election (Read 86 times)
whiteknight
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 8340
melbourne
Gender: male
The Promises That Could Determine Next Election
Feb 15th, 2025 at 12:13pm
 
The promises that could determine the next federal election   Huh

Brisbane Times
February 14, 2025

About 50 per cent of Australia’s electorate is now aged 50 and over, so retirement-related issues are no longer a side note – they’re a deciding factor.

Superannuation, the age pension, housing, healthcare and the cost of living are all on the table. The choices made in this election will shape the future for millions of Australians in their 50s and beyond.



If I were a politician staring down an electorate for whom retirement feels confusing, challenging and overwhelming, I’d be making some big promises to fix it. To help both sides prepare, here is a wish list of the issues on which many over-50s want headway (even as an apolitical voice serving older Australians, I include myself).

Think of it as a pick-list for politicians of pre-election promises they might like to make. You can add your own or debate them in the comments.

Guarantee stability in superannuation tax rules
Superannuation is supposed to provide certainty for retirement, but constant rule changes make it hard for Australians to plan ahead. The current government’s proposed tax on super balances over $3 million has stalled in the Senate, but tax changes in super are rarely off the table.

New governments tweak the system every few years, making long-term financial planning almost impossible. Instead of treating super as a political football, a progressive government could commit to a 10-year (or longer) moratorium on major super tax changes. Retirees and pre-retirees need confidence that the rules won’t keep shifting under them.

Make financial advice cheaper and more accessible
Australia’s financial system is complex, confusing and full of fine print, yet most people are expected to navigate retirement planning on their own. Professional financial advice can make a huge difference, but for many retirees this is simply too expensive.


From tax implications to funding aged care, there are a few important factors to look into when it comes to early inheritances.

Inheritance
What to consider before giving an early inheritance
New laws – whenever they finally arrive – will allow super funds to provide financial advice, which could help fill the gap. But without strict oversight, there’s a real risk that funds will push their own products instead of providing truly independent advice.

Politicians could promise to introduce stronger consumer protections to ensure super fund advice is transparent, product-neutral and genuinely in retirees’ best interests.

They could also expand tax deductions for professional financial planning fees, making one-off financial advice – including super contributions, withdrawals and transition-to-retirement and retirement planning – tax-deductible up to a cap.

That would bring professional advice within reach for all Australians – not just those who can afford to pay thousands upfront. Of course, we’d need protections for consumers to ensure the advice industry didn’t misuse it too.

Improve retirement education so people actually understand super
Most Australians don’t fully understand how it works until they’re nearing retirement, although mandated super has been around for more than three decades. Many retirees don’t know how super withdrawals affect pensions, how super is taxed or how to make savings last for the rest of their lives.

If politicians expect Australians to rely on super, they need to help them understand it first. Instead of relying on a government website that few people use for information, the next government could introduce a national retirement literacy program.

This would cover workplace retirement education, so people understand super long before they retire; online tools and in-person seminars to help people navigate pension rules, tax implications and investment strategies; and a mandate for better education by super funds, making information clear, relevant and easy to act on.

Victoria has shed 20,000 properties from the state’s rental stock over 18 months.


Fix rent assistance so pensioners aren’t left struggling
The age pension was built for home owners, but a growing – though still relatively small – number of retirees and soon-to-be retirees are renting or still carrying mortgages. And the fear of renting for life? That’s terrifying.

Once you hit the age where banks won’t lend to you, there’s little you can do to change your situation. Rising rents and a lack of affordable housing have left more older Australians financially stretched, yet Commonwealth Rent Assistance hasn’t kept pace with rising rents.

If the next government is serious about keeping pensioners above the poverty line, it should increase rent assistance so it reflects real rental costs. Beyond that, we need a proper plan to boost affordable housing for retirees, especially single older women, who are at the highest risk of homelessness.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
whiteknight
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 8340
melbourne
Gender: male
Re: The Promises That Could Determine Next Election
Reply #1 - Feb 15th, 2025 at 12:17pm
 
Remove financial penalties for downsizing

A lack of meaningful reform on addressing housing affordability keeps the nation’s business leaders up at night.


Many retirees would love to downsize, but financial penalties – among them state stamp duty and federal age pension means-testing – often make it more expensive than staying put. Selling the family home can mean losing pension benefits, while the upfront costs of moving can eat into retirement savings.

A government that wanted to shine could promise to work with state governments to expand stamp duty concessions for downsizers and exclude a portion of home sale proceeds from pension means testing.

This would help retirees move into more suitable housing without sacrificing their financial security.

Improve incentives for over-50s to stay in work
Many Australians want to keep working, even part-time or casually beyond 60, but age discrimination, a lack of flexible roles and weak financial incentives make it difficult. Employers often prioritise younger workers, while midlifers struggle to find part-time or contract roles that fit their needs.

The government should increase superannuation and tax incentives for working past pension age and introduce policies that encourage businesses to employ older workers in flexible, part-time and remote roles. If politicians are serious about keeping Australians in the workforce longer, they need to make it easier.

Fix the bulk billing and Medicare crisis
Healthcare costs are rising. Bulk billing is disappearing. Many retirees are paying out-of- pocket for GP visits and specialist care, even though they expected Medicare to cover the basics. Medicare rebates haven’t kept up with medical costs, so older Australians struggle to afford essential care.

Politicians need to increase Medicare rebates for essential services and introduce incentives for GPs to prioritise bulk billing for pensioners and retirees.

Retirees should not have to skip medical care because they can’t afford it.

Stop a hefty deeming rate hike from hurting pensioners and seniors health cardholders
This one isn’t sexy but it’s important. From June 30, the freeze on deeming rates – the calculation that underpins the income test for the age pension – that has been in place since COVID-19 is set to end.

This means the government could lift these rates, increasing the amount Centrelink assumes retirees earn from their savings when assessed for the age pension income test and the Commonwealth Seniors Health Card.

The problem? These assumptions often don’t match reality.

A government-in-waiting could promise to phase in deeming rate increases gradually, ensuring they align with actual investment conditions rather than simply mirroring broader interest rate rises. They should also introduce protections for vulnerable retirees.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 106928
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: The Promises That Could Determine Next Election
Reply #2 - Feb 15th, 2025 at 12:18pm
 


Election campaign.

Dutton is copying Trump - a new DOGE - dept. of Govt efficiency.


https://www.crikey.com.au/2025/02/12/australian-public-service-peter-dutton-effi...


Peter Dutton wants to DOGE-ify the public service.

Andrew Podger February 12, 2025

Dutton’s commitment

Dutton’s Insiders interview followed his lecture at the Menzies Research Centre. In the interview, Dutton referred to the possibility of $24 billion of savings over the four-year forward estimates — $6 billion a year — from reversing the growth in APS employees over the past three years.


more here:
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/jan/27/from-doge-to-smoge-peter-...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Deep State Feller
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 85369
Always was always will be HOME
Gender: male
Re: The Promises That Could Determine Next Election
Reply #3 - Feb 16th, 2025 at 8:30am
 
https://www.msn.com/en-au/money/markets/labor-matches-coalition-ban-on-foreign-h...

"Labor will impose a two-year ban on the purchase of existing Australian homes by foreign investors, mirroring a Coalition policy.

The ban announced by Treasurer Jim Chalmers and Housing Minister Clare O'Neil will take effect from April 1 and prohibit purchases from any foreign investors, including by foreign-owned companies and temporary residents."


Now let's analyse this, poppets:-

"Foreign purchasers account for a very small proportion of Australia's housing stock, owning about two per cent by some estimates."
- aph.com.au

There are around 11,000,000 'dwellings' in Australia...

Australia completed around 170,000 new homes over the year to March 2023, the most recent period for which we have data. That's well short of the needed pace. To meet that 1.2 million goal, we need to increase our pace of building by almost 40% from where it currently stands.  - https://www.realestate.com.au/insights/national-cabinet-is-targeting-1-2-million...

170,000/11,000,000/100 = 1.545%........ if this trend persists .....

Collision alert.. Collision alert......  1.545% is less than 2% ... barp, barp, barp... pull... UP... PULL... UP ... Terrain Alert..


So 'foreign investors' are buying more homes here than are built here.... and then we have LOCAL 'investors'....  anyone with me yet?  Or are you still asleep?

Now add  .... (gasps again) ... NON-foreign investors/buyers ..... brand new citizens brought here since Labor (and hard Labor it is) took office and started mad immigration ...............

If this doesn't stop soon, NOBODY born here will own a home unless they are imports...... generationally Australians are being squeezed out of their own country to suit mad policies that they did not vote on.

Anyway - this would take a book to discuss.  Some say that foreign purchases are only 1.1% - others say 10% ... some cagily skirt around the issue by saying '65 per cent of dwellings funded by foreign investment are sold to Australian buyers.' .... wait one... FUNDED by foreign investment - so the market is designed (again) to profit the Tax Haven New Robber Barons raiding at will - but they don't own it up to the point of sale before vanishing into the ether without paying any taxes on profits???
Back to top
« Last Edit: Feb 16th, 2025 at 8:43am by Grappler Deep State Feller »  

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Daves2017
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1325
Gender: male
Re: The Promises That Could Determine Next Election
Reply #4 - Feb 16th, 2025 at 5:28pm
 
For myself and family since last week’s nurse terrorist attack after jo ( x Albo staffer) and rose’s drunk road trip at the taxpayer expense my vote is firmly decided.

They can promise anything and everything.

I’ve now made up my mind.

This is the problem for any political party that attempts to run a campaign for three to five months.

Everyone tunes out  and waits for the chance to vote pre poll the moment they can because no one trusts what any of the muppets say !
Back to top
« Last Edit: Feb 16th, 2025 at 5:47pm by Daves2017 »  

The views expressed in my posts are mine and mine alone.

I take no responsibility for the publication of my views on this site. The said ( sic) responsibility is with the owner of this website .
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 106928
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: The Promises That Could Determine Next Election
Reply #5 - Feb 16th, 2025 at 5:30pm
 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-02-16/peter-dutton-anthony-albanese-election-po...



Peter Dutton most likely to be next prime minister, according to YouGov poll



Exclusive by Casey Briggs
Topic:   Elections

8h ago



In short:
The results of pollster YouGov's latest MRP model suggest the Coalition would be likely to win about 73 seats, with a lower estimate of 65 and upper estimate of 80, if a federal election was held today.

The modelling indicates Labor would hold about 66 seats in the next parliament, with a lower estimate of 59 and an upper estimate of 72.

What's next?
A federal election must be held by May 17.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print