Bobby. wrote on Feb 21
st, 2025 at 1:17pm:
KangAnon wrote on Feb 21
st, 2025 at 1:06pm:
So you say Trump will save us from WW3, then you complain that Biden took actions to support Ukraine in a deliberate way to avoid WW3...
You're on fire today Bobbi...
No - I'm saying that Zelensky should never have accepted the piss poor help
that led to half a million of his people killed and many cities demolished.
He should have surrendered 3 years ago to save all those lives and the cities.
Why fight a war that destroys your nation?
He had so called guarantees from agreements with Europe and the USA
about protecting Ukraine in case of invasion and they reneged on the deals.
Sorry, who reneged on the security deal, Bobby?
We'll need names, dear.
Vlad's invasion of Ukraine was a test-run for WWIII. If Zalensky had surrended, Vlad would have seized a land army with a good two million troops. Poland would have been first on Vlad's list, drawing in NATO.
Xi would have taken Taiwan. The CCP would now control the South China Sea and South Pacific, including all sea trade routes, vital for Australian supply lines.
So if I was you, I'd be praising Zalensky for his bravery. Not only did he reject Boris Johnson's offer of safe haven, Zalensky stayed put and rallied the world behind a global cause - our peaceful, rules-based post-WWII order.
If we lose this, the dominoes fall and we're in WWIII. Your DL is now the only Western world leader threatening to let it rip. This isn't speculative or hypothetical, it's a fact.
So now we all know where we stand, I'm curious: who's side are you on?
That's a question. If you don't want to answer, just say why.