Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
The Man Who Could Shake Up Australian Politics (Read 268 times)
Ajax
Gold Member
*****
Offline


CO2 has never controlled
temperature on Earth

Posts: 11000
Australia
Gender: male
The Man Who Could Shake Up Australian Politics
Yesterday at 9:23am
 
worth the watch.

Back to top
 

1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax
2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery &  prison" Regas Feraeos
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 109016
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: The Man Who Could Shake Up Australian Politics
Reply #1 - Yesterday at 9:27am
 

2 hours 8 minutes long?

Gimme a break - just tell us who it is?      Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Ajax
Gold Member
*****
Offline


CO2 has never controlled
temperature on Earth

Posts: 11000
Australia
Gender: male
Re: The Man Who Could Shake Up Australian Politics
Reply #2 - Yesterday at 9:33am
 
Bobby. wrote Yesterday at 9:27am:
2 hours 8 minutes long?

Gimme a break - just tell us who it is?      Roll Eyes


Do you or do you not want to know what shapes your life?

Your choice.
Back to top
 

1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax
2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery &  prison" Regas Feraeos
 
IP Logged
 
Gnads
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 30506
Gender: male
Re: The Man Who Could Shake Up Australian Politics
Reply #3 - Yesterday at 1:12pm
 
Bobby. wrote Yesterday at 9:27am:
2 hours 8 minutes long?

Gimme a break - just tell us who it is?      Roll Eyes


I thought the same - but it started to pull me in - hearing all this stuff about corporations and their greed.

It smacks of all the same dodgy corporate actions that caused the GFC in 2007 to 2009 - costing countries and their taxpayers billions if not trillions plus the taxpayer bailouts that were handed out - wasted as bonuses for the very bastards that caused the problem.

Very few if any of the Corporate big whigs faced jail time - only some underlings "thrown" (Smithy grammar check) under the bus as scape goats.

And now it would seem that not one lesson has been learnt by govts around the globe and corporate criminals just went back to their normal criminal activity, only now it's been honed to perfection & infiltrated the financial/tax business of many countries - if you use Schmulows inference to nearly all OECD economies.

Whilst this is happening the Labor supporters and the LNP supporters are arguing the toss about how much tax corporates & big business pay in Australia - and they provide employment.

Well Professor Schmulow certainly answered that - none of them are paying tax.

I have to rethink my voting preferences for Sat the 3rd.

It will not be for the 2 majors nor will it be for any Greens or Teal numpties financed by another non tax paying billionaire Simon Holmes A Court.
Back to top
 

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais
 
IP Logged
 
Setanta
Gold Member
*****
Offline


\/ Peace man!

Posts: 16805
Northern NSW
Gender: male
Re: The Man Who Could Shake Up Australian Politics
Reply #4 - Yesterday at 1:24pm
 
Gnads wrote Yesterday at 1:12pm:
Bobby. wrote Yesterday at 9:27am:
2 hours 8 minutes long?

Gimme a break - just tell us who it is?      Roll Eyes


I thought the same - but it started to pull me in - hearing all this stuff about corporations and their greed.

It smacks of all the same dodgy corporate actions that caused the GFC in 2007 to 2009 - costing countries and their taxpayers billions if not trillions plus the taxpayer bailouts that were handed out - wasted as bonuses for the very bastards that caused the problem.

Very few if any of the Corporate big whigs faced jail time - only some underlings "thrown" (Smithy grammar check) under the bus as scape goats.

And now it would seem that not one lesson has been learnt by govts around the globe and corporate criminals just went back to their normal criminal activity, only now it's been honed to perfection & infiltrated the financial/tax business of many countries - if you use Schmulows inference to nearly all OECD economies.

Whilst this is happening the Labor supporters and the LNP supporters are arguing the toss about how much tax corporates & big business pay in Australia - and they provide employment.

Well Professor Schmulow certainly answered that - none of them are paying tax.

I have to rethink my voting preferences for Sat the 3rd.

It will not be for the 2 majors nor will it be for any Greens or Teal numpties financed by another non tax paying billionaire Simon Holmes A Court.


Same, I know the order of the last few on the ticket but haven't decided on the top. Working from bottom to top so far I have Greens last, then Libs, Labor, Teals, but I'm thinking this guy will probably go to number one.

And yes, I watched the whole thing.

Citizens Party Senate Candidate for New South Wales
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 141563
Gender: male
Re: The Man Who Could Shake Up Australian Politics
Reply #5 - Yesterday at 1:45pm
 
Bobby. wrote Yesterday at 9:27am:
2 hours 8 minutes long?

Gimme a break - just tell us who it is?      Roll Eyes


Yeah, two hours is too long.

Him and his party are part of the LaRouche movement/cult.

Probably all you need to know.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 13626
Gender: male
Re: The Man Who Could Shake Up Australian Politics
Reply #6 - Yesterday at 1:58pm
 
Setanta wrote Yesterday at 1:24pm:
Gnads wrote Yesterday at 1:12pm:
Bobby. wrote Yesterday at 9:27am:
2 hours 8 minutes long?

Gimme a break - just tell us who it is?      Roll Eyes


I thought the same - but it started to pull me in - hearing all this stuff about corporations and their greed.

It smacks of all the same dodgy corporate actions that caused the GFC in 2007 to 2009 - costing countries and their taxpayers billions if not trillions plus the taxpayer bailouts that were handed out - wasted as bonuses for the very bastards that caused the problem.

Very few if any of the Corporate big whigs faced jail time - only some underlings "thrown" (Smithy grammar check) under the bus as scape goats.

And now it would seem that not one lesson has been learnt by govts around the globe and corporate criminals just went back to their normal criminal activity, only now it's been honed to perfection & infiltrated the financial/tax business of many countries - if you use Schmulows inference to nearly all OECD economies.

Whilst this is happening the Labor supporters and the LNP supporters are arguing the toss about how much tax corporates & big business pay in Australia - and they provide employment.

Well Professor Schmulow certainly answered that - none of them are paying tax.

I have to rethink my voting preferences for Sat the 3rd.

It will not be for the 2 majors nor will it be for any Greens or Teal numpties financed by another non tax paying billionaire Simon Holmes A Court.


Same, I know the order of the last few on the ticket but haven't decided on the top. Working from bottom to top so far I have Greens last, then Libs, Labor, Teals, but I'm thinking this guy will probably go to number one.

And yes, I watched the whole thing.

Citizens Party Senate Candidate for New South Wales


In  your link, I read this far:

"Andy Schmulow is fired up. His gripe? Companies are too big and too powerful. So much so, they’re threatening democracy’s foundations, corrupting politicians and bureaucrats with excessive lobbying and generous donations. Read More… (Note: Article is behind Pay Wall)

I'm not sure I want to pay for access,  because that's exactly what the Greens are saying, which is why the Greens are demanding these companies  pay higher taxes.

The Greens want higher taxes for tax-avoiding companies, and higher taxes for billionaires;  but Gnads says you can't tax the "job creators" - even though he aparently agrees with Schmulow.

Does Schmulow agree with Gnads, or the Greens, or something else?   
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Setanta
Gold Member
*****
Offline


\/ Peace man!

Posts: 16805
Northern NSW
Gender: male
Re: The Man Who Could Shake Up Australian Politics
Reply #7 - Yesterday at 2:02pm
 
thegreatdivide wrote Yesterday at 1:58pm:
Setanta wrote Yesterday at 1:24pm:
Gnads wrote Yesterday at 1:12pm:
Bobby. wrote Yesterday at 9:27am:
2 hours 8 minutes long?

Gimme a break - just tell us who it is?      Roll Eyes


I thought the same - but it started to pull me in - hearing all this stuff about corporations and their greed.

It smacks of all the same dodgy corporate actions that caused the GFC in 2007 to 2009 - costing countries and their taxpayers billions if not trillions plus the taxpayer bailouts that were handed out - wasted as bonuses for the very bastards that caused the problem.

Very few if any of the Corporate big whigs faced jail time - only some underlings "thrown" (Smithy grammar check) under the bus as scape goats.

And now it would seem that not one lesson has been learnt by govts around the globe and corporate criminals just went back to their normal criminal activity, only now it's been honed to perfection & infiltrated the financial/tax business of many countries - if you use Schmulows inference to nearly all OECD economies.

Whilst this is happening the Labor supporters and the LNP supporters are arguing the toss about how much tax corporates & big business pay in Australia - and they provide employment.

Well Professor Schmulow certainly answered that - none of them are paying tax.

I have to rethink my voting preferences for Sat the 3rd.

It will not be for the 2 majors nor will it be for any Greens or Teal numpties financed by another non tax paying billionaire Simon Holmes A Court.


Same, I know the order of the last few on the ticket but haven't decided on the top. Working from bottom to top so far I have Greens last, then Libs, Labor, Teals, but I'm thinking this guy will probably go to number one.

And yes, I watched the whole thing.

Citizens Party Senate Candidate for New South Wales


In  your link, I read this far:

"Andy Schmulow is fired up. His gripe? Companies are too big and too powerful. So much so, they’re threatening democracy’s foundations, corrupting politicians and bureaucrats with excessive lobbying and generous donations. Read More… (Note: Article is behind Pay Wall)

I'm not sure I want to pay for access,  because that's exactly what the Greens are saying, which is why the Greens are demanding these companies  pay higher taxes.

The Greens want higher taxes for tax-avoiding companies, and higher taxes for billionaires;  but Gnads says you can't tax the "job creators" - even though he aparently agrees with Schmulow.

Does Schmulow agree with Gnads, or the Greens, or something else?   


You'll have to ask Gnads that. As for the paywall, that's the newspaper. There is a link to a PDF of the article there right beside it.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 13626
Gender: male
Re: The Man Who Could Shake Up Australian Politics
Reply #8 - Yesterday at 2:10pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote Yesterday at 1:45pm:
Bobby. wrote Yesterday at 9:27am:
2 hours 8 minutes long?

Gimme a break - just tell us who it is?      Roll Eyes


Yeah, two hours is too long.

Him and his party are part of the LaRouche movement/cult.

Probably all you need to know.


Thanks, so:

(google)

According to Matko Meštrović, emeritus senior research fellow at the Institute of Economics of Zagreb, Croatia,[3] LaRouche's economic policies call for a program modeled on the economic-recovery program of the Franklin D. Roosevelt administration, including fixed exchange rates, capital controls, exchange controls, currency controls, and protectionist price and trade agreements among partner-nations, although Roosevelt generally pursued trade liberalization.[4][5] LaRouche also called for a reorganization of debt world-wide, and a global plan for large-scale, continental infrastructure projects.[5][6][7] He rejects free trade, deregulation, and globalization

Hey, now I AM interested in Schmulow.

This requires further investigation... me agreeing with Gnads on macro-economic theory....?  Huh

I know Greg is on board with current mainstream neoclassical economics which is churning out billionaires while entire nations are going broke.....and even Trump thinks the world is stealing from the US....  Shocked 
Back to top
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 2:24pm by thegreatdivide »  
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 13626
Gender: male
Re: The Man Who Could Shake Up Australian Politics
Reply #9 - Yesterday at 2:21pm
 
Setanta wrote Yesterday at 2:02pm:
thegreatdivide wrote Yesterday at 1:58pm:
Setanta wrote Yesterday at 1:24pm:
Gnads wrote Yesterday at 1:12pm:
Bobby. wrote Yesterday at 9:27am:
2 hours 8 minutes long?

Gimme a break - just tell us who it is?      Roll Eyes


I thought the same - but it started to pull me in - hearing all this stuff about corporations and their greed.

It smacks of all the same dodgy corporate actions that caused the GFC in 2007 to 2009 - costing countries and their taxpayers billions if not trillions plus the taxpayer bailouts that were handed out - wasted as bonuses for the very bastards that caused the problem.

Very few if any of the Corporate big whigs faced jail time - only some underlings "thrown" (Smithy grammar check) under the bus as scape goats.

And now it would seem that not one lesson has been learnt by govts around the globe and corporate criminals just went back to their normal criminal activity, only now it's been honed to perfection & infiltrated the financial/tax business of many countries - if you use Schmulows inference to nearly all OECD economies.

Whilst this is happening the Labor supporters and the LNP supporters are arguing the toss about how much tax corporates & big business pay in Australia - and they provide employment.

Well Professor Schmulow certainly answered that - none of them are paying tax.

I have to rethink my voting preferences for Sat the 3rd.

It will not be for the 2 majors nor will it be for any Greens or Teal numpties financed by another non tax paying billionaire Simon Holmes A Court.


Same, I know the order of the last few on the ticket but haven't decided on the top. Working from bottom to top so far I have Greens last, then Libs, Labor, Teals, but I'm thinking this guy will probably go to number one.

And yes, I watched the whole thing.

Citizens Party Senate Candidate for New South Wales


In  your link, I read this far:

"Andy Schmulow is fired up. His gripe? Companies are too big and too powerful. So much so, they’re threatening democracy’s foundations, corrupting politicians and bureaucrats with excessive lobbying and generous donations. Read More… (Note: Article is behind Pay Wall)

I'm not sure I want to pay for access,  because that's exactly what the Greens are saying, which is why the Greens are demanding these companies  pay higher taxes.

The Greens want higher taxes for tax-avoiding companies, and higher taxes for billionaires;  but Gnads says you can't tax the "job creators" - even though he aparently agrees with Schmulow.

Does Schmulow agree with Gnads, or the Greens, or something else?   


You'll have to ask Gnads that. As for the paywall, that's the newspaper. There is a link to a PDF of the article there right beside it.


Thanks, I'll look at it later.

I'm voting  Greens  next week , though I'm a paid up  member of Labor; I loathe Albo's cowardice in the face of Dutton's goading re capital gains and negative gearing tax breaks, surely there are fewer greedy rent-seekers than voters  who are desperate to access affordable rentals,  least of all own a mortgage.

Lets' see what Schmulow has to say.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 141563
Gender: male
Re: The Man Who Could Shake Up Australian Politics
Reply #10 - Yesterday at 2:23pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote Yesterday at 1:45pm:
Bobby. wrote Yesterday at 9:27am:
2 hours 8 minutes long?

Gimme a break - just tell us who it is?      Roll Eyes


Yeah, two hours is too long.

Him and his party are part of the LaRouche movement/cult.

Probably all you need to know.


The LaRouche movement has been accused of violence, harassment, and heckling since the 1970s.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 109016
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: The Man Who Could Shake Up Australian Politics
Reply #11 - Yesterday at 2:28pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote Yesterday at 1:45pm:
Bobby. wrote Yesterday at 9:27am:
2 hours 8 minutes long?

Gimme a break - just tell us who it is?      Roll Eyes


Yeah, two hours is too long.

Him and his party are part of the LaRouche movement/cult.

Probably all you need to know.



His name didn't connect to that with Google and he's not mentioned here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LaRouche_movement
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 13626
Gender: male
Re: The Man Who Could Shake Up Australian Politics
Reply #12 - Yesterday at 2:31pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote Yesterday at 2:23pm:
greggerypeccary wrote Yesterday at 1:45pm:
Bobby. wrote Yesterday at 9:27am:
2 hours 8 minutes long?

Gimme a break - just tell us who it is?      Roll Eyes


Yeah, two hours is too long.

Him and his party are part of the LaRouche movement/cult.

Probably all you need to know.


The LaRouche movement has been accused of violence, harassment, and heckling since the 1970s.


I wouldn't mind a bit a of organized harassment directed at officials and academics who are complicit in maintaining the current economic dysfunction in the world.

Gregory Mankiw (neoclassical-economist educator extraordinaire) - "you're fired".....
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 13626
Gender: male
Re: The Man Who Could Shake Up Australian Politics
Reply #13 - Yesterday at 2:34pm
 
Bobby. wrote Yesterday at 2:28pm:
greggerypeccary wrote Yesterday at 1:45pm:
Bobby. wrote Yesterday at 9:27am:
2 hours 8 minutes long?

Gimme a break - just tell us who it is?      Roll Eyes


Yeah, two hours is too long.

Him and his party are part of the LaRouche movement/cult.

Probably all you need to know.



His name didn't connect to that with Google and he's not mentioned here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LaRouche_movement


Ah...so Scmulow isn't connected to Larouche.....?

H'mm ....Greens still in line for my vote.   
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 141563
Gender: male
Re: The Man Who Could Shake Up Australian Politics
Reply #14 - Yesterday at 2:36pm
 
Bobby. wrote Yesterday at 2:28pm:
greggerypeccary wrote Yesterday at 1:45pm:
Bobby. wrote Yesterday at 9:27am:
2 hours 8 minutes long?

Gimme a break - just tell us who it is?      Roll Eyes


Yeah, two hours is too long.

Him and his party are part of the LaRouche movement/cult.

Probably all you need to know.



His name didn't connect to that with Google and he's not mentioned here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LaRouche_movement


The Australian Citizens Party (ACP), formerly the Citizens Electoral Council of Australia (CEC), is a minor political party in Australia, founded in 1988 and registered with the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC).

Affiliated with the international LaRouche movement which was founded by the late American activist and controversial figure Lyndon LaRouche, the ACP promotes policies focused on banking reform, economic sovereignty, and an independent foreign policy.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print