Belgarion wrote on Aug 6
th, 2021 at 9:37pm:
I doubt very much if rape can be proven given what we have read in the media. This may not be right, but that is how it will be. If the accused is found not guilty it will be in no small measure due to the incompetence of the so called security personnel at Parliament House.
ACT Law says that a woman drunk cannot give consent - but what proof is there that sexual intercourse even took place?
I'm afraid Britanny shot her own case in the foot by not following through on the night or morning after, and I still question whether or not the security staff should have known if sexual intercourse had taken place...
My sense of smell is very poor, but even I can smell raunch....... a drunk woman smelling of semen could not have given consent under ACT Law which governs Parliament House.
Dereliction of Duty is how I see it... and possibly with depraved indifference, and the excuse of following orders given after the event is not sufficient....
Love to see those 'security' officers on the stand... typical lowered standards that apply these days... employ drones and time servers and blind followers with no moral compass ... mainly sheilas of course .... boot out the best....
Just normal procedure to allow drunken sex to take place in Ministerial offices and then cover it up...
Changes Needed On All Fronts!!