Bobby. wrote on Aug 30^th, 2023 at 9:20pm:


Never thought I'd see those words in the same sentence   

Carl D wrote on Sep 21^st, 2023 at 10:22am:



its important we ask the lifters as well as the leaners, carl

https://www.9news.com.au/national/prime-minister-to-announce-12-month-covid-inqu...


Dirty Dan will get off Scott free.

the scope of the inquiry does not include "actions taken unilaterally by state and territory governments", meaning it won't be able to investigate the lockdowns and border closures that had such an impact on millions of Australians.

Albo's fake inquiry:


https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/anne-ruston-calls-on-public-and-sector...


Shadow health minister Anne Ruston called on Australians to question Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s inquiry into the former Coalition government’s response to COVID-19.

The independent inquiry, announced on Thursday, stopped short of a royal commission which could compel witnesses and probe states and territories on their actions at the time.

It drew criticism as states and territories were largely left to enforce and lift regulations as they saw fit in consultations with relevant health chiefs. 

Ms Ruston told Sky News Australia the consequences of some of the states and territories’ actions were being ignored under the Prime Minister’s inquiry. 

“To have an inquiry that doesn’t compel the states and territories to participate in it is just joke,” she said on Thursday.

“It is not a half an inquiry, it is not really an inquiry at all.”

The Liberal Senator said she would be fighting to see states and territories answer for their actions and called on the public and impacted sectors to question their premiers and federal government.

“(Australians) should be asking those Premiers ‘what have you got to hide, why won’t you let Australia and particularly people who live in the state have some transparency about the actions they took during the pandemic’,” she said.

Bobby... Bobby... Bobby...

Are you in any way surprised?

All you need to know is here:

https://nitter.net/AlboMP/status/1704677358081638497#m

Lots of replies (and I haven't had time to read all of them) but it's safe to say that 99% are carrying on about border closures, lockdowns, masks, vaccines and other Covid protections that kept the majority of the population safe during the (ongoing) worst pandemic in over 100 years.

Finding a comment that mentions the nearly 23,000 deaths (14,000 since Albanese became PM), tens of thousands of hospitalisations and Long Covid is like looking for a needle in a haystack.

Albanese (and the rest of our pollies) is/are once again treating the Australian population like the brainwashed mindless sheep that the majority of them are. And, it wasn't by accident that we've come to this point, by the way.

Carl D wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2023 at 9:01am:



Just a few things I observed:

Dan got in the way between the sacred relationship of a doctor to their patient.
He has no medical qualifications but he was there by his laws at every doctor's desk.
People were denied elective surgery such as colonoscopies so many
will die a horrible death from colon cancer.
He closed down elective surgery in private hospitals which were none of his business.

He forced vaccines on to people or they would lose their jobs even though
a normal vaccine takes 10 years to approve and the ones used were only tested for 2 months
so he had no idea of the long term hazards involved.

People were arrested and fined for sitting on a park bench or beach
even though there was no record of people contracting Covid outside in the fresh air
and knowing that sunlight kills Covid.

He locked up 5.5 million of us under arrest for over 260 days -
a huge over reaction -
the whole state was put into lockdown over less than 5 cases.

Dan was completely out of control - he was in effect a madman running the state.
Many people were seriously injured by his thug police
who were only too glad to enforce his outrageous laws.
One was a 70 year old lady.

Now - he'll get off Scott free thanks to his mate Albo.

Bobby. wrote on Sep 21^st, 2023 at 11:19pm:


Hey Bobby...

...here you go.

I'm betting right now that he won't be asked to appear and neither will Perrottet.

But, if by some 'miracle' they did appear (after they've lawyered up, of course) then I certainly wouldn't want to miss it. The outpouring of BS from the pair of them would be something to behold.

Same as what would happen if the rest of the current and former Premiers were called to appear.

And I also bet we'll be hearing a lot of "I can't recall" and "That wasn't my responsibility" (making a mockery of this "personal responsibility" that us plebs are supposed to be practising now) during this upcoming farce of an inquiry.

Quote:

Bobby. wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2023 at 9:24am:

No mate, you did not "observe" those things.  As a
presumed anti-vaxxer, you misinterpreted what you
thought you saw at the time, and are still using
those distorted claims as some sort of current evidence.

Quote:

Nope; he had sound, professional medical advice from
competent and qualified scientists and researchers. 
You're implication that it was Andrews alone who made
all these decision during COVID-19 is nonsensical.

Quote:

We all knew that, which is exactly why he relied on a
team of medical experts to advise him at the time.
Andrews didn't have any need to be medically qualified.   
That's simply a straw man.

Quote:

Nope.  "Elective" surgeries were delayed only. Elective
surgeries fall into three categories; urgent, semi-urgent
and non-urgent.  No "urgent" surgeries were denied.

Quote:

Not so.  Research data from previous coronaviruses such
as SARS-CoV-1 in February 2003 and MERS‐CoV in 2012,
gave researchers a head start when it came to building
the COVID-19 vaccines.

Quote:

No.  Nobody in Victoria was "locked up" LOL.  At all time
we could leave our houses to travel inside a 5km radius
from our home.  That's an area of around 80km2.  Hardly
restrictive!  In fact, during that lockdown, I actually travelled
more than 70km from home, twice, for medical treatment.

Quote:

Oh dear...    mate, you've seriously lost the plot.   

At any rate, you've fallen for the old trap of being
wise after the event—hindsight is a wonderful
teacher.  The decisions made at the time, from
March 2020 onwards were based on the best
observational data, and research, of this brand new
virus, the SARS-CoV-2.

I can absolutely, 100%, guarantee that you—as
a layman—had not the vaguest notion of what the
new virus was, or its ultimately devastating effect
on human life globally, or even how it could be treated
in March 2020.  If you had, you would now have a
Nobel Prize sitting on your desk.