User talk:Mantra: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Meaning of "exceptional circumstances": Where an administrator loses sight of his duties and becomes the master and not the servant and cannot fulfill his duties under the Constitution; for example...interferes with a member's log in ability, logs into a membership without permission, imposes unfair and harsh conditions on selected members but not others, bans members on a personal whim and ignores repeated requests of members. | Meaning of "exceptional circumstances": Where an administrator loses sight of his duties and becomes the master and not the servant and cannot fulfill his duties under the Constitution; for example...interferes with a member's log in ability, logs into a membership without permission, imposes unfair and harsh conditions on selected members but not others, bans members on a personal whim or without good reason and ignores repeated requests of members for certain changes. | ||
Revision as of 11:30, 5 November 2011
Welcome to Australian Politics Wiki! We hope you will contribute much and well. You'll probably want to read the help pages. Again, welcome and have fun! Freediver 00:16, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
{To be inserted into the Constitution - just before Rules.}
Exceptional circumstances
Where an administrator becomes corrupted by his/her own idealism and a petition to remove the said administrator becomes blocked, deleted or difficult to access - then the owner of Political Animal may be requested to intervene and remove the administrative control by using proxy votes if necessary.
The discharged administrator will forfeit his eligibility to nominate him/herself or be nominated as administrator in the ensuing election.
{Perhaps "exceptional circumstances" could be clarified as a sub-clause}
Meaning of "exceptional circumstances": Where an administrator loses sight of his duties and becomes the master and not the servant and cannot fulfill his duties under the Constitution; for example...interferes with a member's log in ability, logs into a membership without permission, imposes unfair and harsh conditions on selected members but not others, bans members on a personal whim or without good reason and ignores repeated requests of members for certain changes.